Cargando…

Depth Perception and Grasp in Central Field Loss

PURPOSE: We set out to determine whether individuals with central field loss benefit from using two eyes to perform a grasping task. Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that this advantage is correlated with coarse stereopsis, in addition to binocular summation indices of visual acuity, contrast...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verghese, Preeti, Tyson, Terence L., Ghahghaei, Saeideh, Fletcher, Donald C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4819556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27031841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-18336
_version_ 1782425227246960640
author Verghese, Preeti
Tyson, Terence L.
Ghahghaei, Saeideh
Fletcher, Donald C.
author_facet Verghese, Preeti
Tyson, Terence L.
Ghahghaei, Saeideh
Fletcher, Donald C.
author_sort Verghese, Preeti
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We set out to determine whether individuals with central field loss benefit from using two eyes to perform a grasping task. Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that this advantage is correlated with coarse stereopsis, in addition to binocular summation indices of visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and binocular visual field. METHODS: Sixteen participants with macular degeneration and nine age-matched controls placed pegs on a pegboard, while their eye and hand movements were recorded. Importantly, the pegboard was placed near eye height, to minimize the contribution of monocular cues to peg position. All participants performed this task binocularly and monocularly. Before the experiment, we performed microperimetry to determine the profile of field loss in each eye and the locations of eccentric fixation (if applicable). In addition, we measured both acuity and contrast sensitivity monocularly and binocularly, and stereopsis by using both a RanDot test and a custom stereo test. RESULTS: Peg-placement time was significantly shorter and participants made significantly fewer errors with binocular than with monocular viewing in both the patient and control groups. Among participants with measurable stereopsis, binocular advantage in peg-placement time was significantly correlated with stereoacuity (ρ = −0.78; P = 0.003). In patients without measurable stereopsis, the binocular advantage was related significantly to the overlap in the scotoma between the two eyes (ρ = −0.81; P = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: The high correlation between grasp performance and stereoacuity indicates that coarse stereopsis may benefit tasks of daily living for individuals with central field loss.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4819556
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48195562016-09-01 Depth Perception and Grasp in Central Field Loss Verghese, Preeti Tyson, Terence L. Ghahghaei, Saeideh Fletcher, Donald C. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Low Vision PURPOSE: We set out to determine whether individuals with central field loss benefit from using two eyes to perform a grasping task. Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that this advantage is correlated with coarse stereopsis, in addition to binocular summation indices of visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and binocular visual field. METHODS: Sixteen participants with macular degeneration and nine age-matched controls placed pegs on a pegboard, while their eye and hand movements were recorded. Importantly, the pegboard was placed near eye height, to minimize the contribution of monocular cues to peg position. All participants performed this task binocularly and monocularly. Before the experiment, we performed microperimetry to determine the profile of field loss in each eye and the locations of eccentric fixation (if applicable). In addition, we measured both acuity and contrast sensitivity monocularly and binocularly, and stereopsis by using both a RanDot test and a custom stereo test. RESULTS: Peg-placement time was significantly shorter and participants made significantly fewer errors with binocular than with monocular viewing in both the patient and control groups. Among participants with measurable stereopsis, binocular advantage in peg-placement time was significantly correlated with stereoacuity (ρ = −0.78; P = 0.003). In patients without measurable stereopsis, the binocular advantage was related significantly to the overlap in the scotoma between the two eyes (ρ = −0.81; P = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: The high correlation between grasp performance and stereoacuity indicates that coarse stereopsis may benefit tasks of daily living for individuals with central field loss. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2016-03-31 2016-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4819556/ /pubmed/27031841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-18336 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Low Vision
Verghese, Preeti
Tyson, Terence L.
Ghahghaei, Saeideh
Fletcher, Donald C.
Depth Perception and Grasp in Central Field Loss
title Depth Perception and Grasp in Central Field Loss
title_full Depth Perception and Grasp in Central Field Loss
title_fullStr Depth Perception and Grasp in Central Field Loss
title_full_unstemmed Depth Perception and Grasp in Central Field Loss
title_short Depth Perception and Grasp in Central Field Loss
title_sort depth perception and grasp in central field loss
topic Low Vision
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4819556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27031841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-18336
work_keys_str_mv AT verghesepreeti depthperceptionandgraspincentralfieldloss
AT tysonterencel depthperceptionandgraspincentralfieldloss
AT ghahghaeisaeideh depthperceptionandgraspincentralfieldloss
AT fletcherdonaldc depthperceptionandgraspincentralfieldloss