Cargando…

Central Pseudo-Aneurysm Formation Following Arterial Closure with a StarClose SE Device: When a StarClose Doesn’t Completely Close

Patient: Male, 77 Final Diagnosis: Femoral artery pseudoaneurysm Symptoms: None Medication: — Clinical Procedure: Cardiac catheterization and coronary stenting with Starclose vascular closure Specialty: Interventional Cardiology OBJECTIVE: Educational Purpose (only if useful for a systematic review...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Memon, Sehrish, Ball, Timothy C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4819689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27026227
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AJCR.896587
_version_ 1782425259624890368
author Memon, Sehrish
Ball, Timothy C.
author_facet Memon, Sehrish
Ball, Timothy C.
author_sort Memon, Sehrish
collection PubMed
description Patient: Male, 77 Final Diagnosis: Femoral artery pseudoaneurysm Symptoms: None Medication: — Clinical Procedure: Cardiac catheterization and coronary stenting with Starclose vascular closure Specialty: Interventional Cardiology OBJECTIVE: Educational Purpose (only if useful for a systematic review or synthesis) BACKGROUND: Vascular closure devices (VCDs) are frequently used for hemostasis with endovascular procedures by employing sutures or plug devices (using collagen or hydrogel) or through the use of a metal clip made of nickel and titanium, such as the StarClose SE device. In comparison to manual compression (MC), VCDs are associated with earlier time to discharge and ambulation, improved patient comfort, and better cost-effectiveness. CASE REPORT: A 77-year-old man with history of ischemic cardiomyopathy with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) underwent diagnostic cardiac catheterization with deployment of a StarClose SE vascular closure device for hemostasis. Upon repeat access 4 days later for coronary intervention, retrograde sheath angiography revealed a pseudo-aneurysm emanating from the center of the StarClose clip. CONCLUSIONS: A review of the literature shows VCDs to be non-inferior to MC, with an overall high success rate. Major and minor complications rates are comparable to those with MC, and pseudo-aneurysm is an infrequent complication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4819689
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48196892016-04-14 Central Pseudo-Aneurysm Formation Following Arterial Closure with a StarClose SE Device: When a StarClose Doesn’t Completely Close Memon, Sehrish Ball, Timothy C. Am J Case Rep Articles Patient: Male, 77 Final Diagnosis: Femoral artery pseudoaneurysm Symptoms: None Medication: — Clinical Procedure: Cardiac catheterization and coronary stenting with Starclose vascular closure Specialty: Interventional Cardiology OBJECTIVE: Educational Purpose (only if useful for a systematic review or synthesis) BACKGROUND: Vascular closure devices (VCDs) are frequently used for hemostasis with endovascular procedures by employing sutures or plug devices (using collagen or hydrogel) or through the use of a metal clip made of nickel and titanium, such as the StarClose SE device. In comparison to manual compression (MC), VCDs are associated with earlier time to discharge and ambulation, improved patient comfort, and better cost-effectiveness. CASE REPORT: A 77-year-old man with history of ischemic cardiomyopathy with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) underwent diagnostic cardiac catheterization with deployment of a StarClose SE vascular closure device for hemostasis. Upon repeat access 4 days later for coronary intervention, retrograde sheath angiography revealed a pseudo-aneurysm emanating from the center of the StarClose clip. CONCLUSIONS: A review of the literature shows VCDs to be non-inferior to MC, with an overall high success rate. Major and minor complications rates are comparable to those with MC, and pseudo-aneurysm is an infrequent complication. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2016-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4819689/ /pubmed/27026227 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AJCR.896587 Text en © Am J Case Rep, 2016 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License
spellingShingle Articles
Memon, Sehrish
Ball, Timothy C.
Central Pseudo-Aneurysm Formation Following Arterial Closure with a StarClose SE Device: When a StarClose Doesn’t Completely Close
title Central Pseudo-Aneurysm Formation Following Arterial Closure with a StarClose SE Device: When a StarClose Doesn’t Completely Close
title_full Central Pseudo-Aneurysm Formation Following Arterial Closure with a StarClose SE Device: When a StarClose Doesn’t Completely Close
title_fullStr Central Pseudo-Aneurysm Formation Following Arterial Closure with a StarClose SE Device: When a StarClose Doesn’t Completely Close
title_full_unstemmed Central Pseudo-Aneurysm Formation Following Arterial Closure with a StarClose SE Device: When a StarClose Doesn’t Completely Close
title_short Central Pseudo-Aneurysm Formation Following Arterial Closure with a StarClose SE Device: When a StarClose Doesn’t Completely Close
title_sort central pseudo-aneurysm formation following arterial closure with a starclose se device: when a starclose doesn’t completely close
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4819689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27026227
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AJCR.896587
work_keys_str_mv AT memonsehrish centralpseudoaneurysmformationfollowingarterialclosurewithastarclosesedevicewhenastarclosedoesntcompletelyclose
AT balltimothyc centralpseudoaneurysmformationfollowingarterialclosurewithastarclosesedevicewhenastarclosedoesntcompletelyclose