Cargando…

Computerized System for Staging Peritoneal Surface Malignancies

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal surface malignancies (PSMs) are usually staged using Sugarbaker’s Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) and completeness of cytoreduction score (CC-s). Although these staging tools are essential for selecting patients and evaluating outcome after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyper...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sammartino, Paolo, Biacchi, Daniele, Cornali, Tommaso, Accarpio, Fabio, Sibio, Simone, Luraschi, Bernard, Impagnatiello, Alessio, Di Giorgio, Angelo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4819745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26564242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4966-5
_version_ 1782425273278398464
author Sammartino, Paolo
Biacchi, Daniele
Cornali, Tommaso
Accarpio, Fabio
Sibio, Simone
Luraschi, Bernard
Impagnatiello, Alessio
Di Giorgio, Angelo
author_facet Sammartino, Paolo
Biacchi, Daniele
Cornali, Tommaso
Accarpio, Fabio
Sibio, Simone
Luraschi, Bernard
Impagnatiello, Alessio
Di Giorgio, Angelo
author_sort Sammartino, Paolo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Peritoneal surface malignancies (PSMs) are usually staged using Sugarbaker’s Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) and completeness of cytoreduction score (CC-s). Although these staging tools are essential for selecting patients and evaluating outcome after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), both scoring models lack some anatomic information, thus making staging laborious and unreliable. Maintaining Sugarbaker’s original concepts, we therefore developed a computerized digital tool, including a new anatomic scheme for calculating PCI and CC-s corresponding closely to patients’ real anatomy. Our new anatomic model belongs in a web-based application known as the PSM Staging System, which contains essential clinical and pathological data for the various PSMs currently treated. METHODS: The new digital tool for staging PSM runs on a personal computer or tablet and comprises male and female colored anatomic models for the 13 endoabdominal regions, with borders defined according to real anatomic landmarks. A drag-and-drop tool allows users to compute the PCI and CC-s, making it easier to localize and quantify disease at diagnosis and throughout treatment, and residual disease after CRS. CONCLUSIONS: Once tested online by registered users, our computerized application should provide a modern, shareable, comprehensive, user-friendly PSM staging system. Its anatomic features, along with the drag-and-drop tool, promise to make it easier to compare preoperative and postoperative PCIs, thus improving the criteria for selecting patients to undergo CRS plus HIPEC. By specifying the size, site, and number of residual lesions after CRS plus HIPEC, our digital tool should help stratify patients into outcome classes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1245/s10434-015-4966-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4819745
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48197452016-04-10 Computerized System for Staging Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Sammartino, Paolo Biacchi, Daniele Cornali, Tommaso Accarpio, Fabio Sibio, Simone Luraschi, Bernard Impagnatiello, Alessio Di Giorgio, Angelo Ann Surg Oncol Gastrointestinal Oncology BACKGROUND: Peritoneal surface malignancies (PSMs) are usually staged using Sugarbaker’s Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) and completeness of cytoreduction score (CC-s). Although these staging tools are essential for selecting patients and evaluating outcome after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), both scoring models lack some anatomic information, thus making staging laborious and unreliable. Maintaining Sugarbaker’s original concepts, we therefore developed a computerized digital tool, including a new anatomic scheme for calculating PCI and CC-s corresponding closely to patients’ real anatomy. Our new anatomic model belongs in a web-based application known as the PSM Staging System, which contains essential clinical and pathological data for the various PSMs currently treated. METHODS: The new digital tool for staging PSM runs on a personal computer or tablet and comprises male and female colored anatomic models for the 13 endoabdominal regions, with borders defined according to real anatomic landmarks. A drag-and-drop tool allows users to compute the PCI and CC-s, making it easier to localize and quantify disease at diagnosis and throughout treatment, and residual disease after CRS. CONCLUSIONS: Once tested online by registered users, our computerized application should provide a modern, shareable, comprehensive, user-friendly PSM staging system. Its anatomic features, along with the drag-and-drop tool, promise to make it easier to compare preoperative and postoperative PCIs, thus improving the criteria for selecting patients to undergo CRS plus HIPEC. By specifying the size, site, and number of residual lesions after CRS plus HIPEC, our digital tool should help stratify patients into outcome classes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1245/s10434-015-4966-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2015-11-12 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4819745/ /pubmed/26564242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4966-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Gastrointestinal Oncology
Sammartino, Paolo
Biacchi, Daniele
Cornali, Tommaso
Accarpio, Fabio
Sibio, Simone
Luraschi, Bernard
Impagnatiello, Alessio
Di Giorgio, Angelo
Computerized System for Staging Peritoneal Surface Malignancies
title Computerized System for Staging Peritoneal Surface Malignancies
title_full Computerized System for Staging Peritoneal Surface Malignancies
title_fullStr Computerized System for Staging Peritoneal Surface Malignancies
title_full_unstemmed Computerized System for Staging Peritoneal Surface Malignancies
title_short Computerized System for Staging Peritoneal Surface Malignancies
title_sort computerized system for staging peritoneal surface malignancies
topic Gastrointestinal Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4819745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26564242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4966-5
work_keys_str_mv AT sammartinopaolo computerizedsystemforstagingperitonealsurfacemalignancies
AT biacchidaniele computerizedsystemforstagingperitonealsurfacemalignancies
AT cornalitommaso computerizedsystemforstagingperitonealsurfacemalignancies
AT accarpiofabio computerizedsystemforstagingperitonealsurfacemalignancies
AT sibiosimone computerizedsystemforstagingperitonealsurfacemalignancies
AT luraschibernard computerizedsystemforstagingperitonealsurfacemalignancies
AT impagnatielloalessio computerizedsystemforstagingperitonealsurfacemalignancies
AT digiorgioangelo computerizedsystemforstagingperitonealsurfacemalignancies