Cargando…
Impact of Tumor Size on Probability of Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
BACKGROUND: The prospective Neoadjuvant Breast Symphony Trial (NBRST) study found that MammaPrint/BluePrint functional molecular subtype is superior to conventional immunohistochemistry/fluorescence in situ hybridization subtyping for predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chem...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4819747/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26714960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-5030-1 |
_version_ | 1782425273743966208 |
---|---|
author | Baron, Paul Beitsch, Peter Boselli, Danielle Symanowski, James Pellicane, James V. Beatty, Jennifer Richards, Paul Mislowsky, Angela Nash, Charles Lee, Laura A. Murray, Mary de Snoo, Femke A. Stork-Sloots, Lisette Gittleman, Mark Akbari, Stephanie Whitworth, Pat |
author_facet | Baron, Paul Beitsch, Peter Boselli, Danielle Symanowski, James Pellicane, James V. Beatty, Jennifer Richards, Paul Mislowsky, Angela Nash, Charles Lee, Laura A. Murray, Mary de Snoo, Femke A. Stork-Sloots, Lisette Gittleman, Mark Akbari, Stephanie Whitworth, Pat |
author_sort | Baron, Paul |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The prospective Neoadjuvant Breast Symphony Trial (NBRST) study found that MammaPrint/BluePrint functional molecular subtype is superior to conventional immunohistochemistry/fluorescence in situ hybridization subtyping for predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The purpose of this substudy was to determine if the rate of pCR is affected by tumor size. METHODS: The NBRST study includes breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. MammaPrint/BluePrint subtyping classified patients into four molecular subgroups: Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2), and Basal type. Probability of pCR (ypT0/isN0) as a function of tumor size and molecular subgroup was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 608 patients were evaluable with overall pCR rates of 28.5 %. Luminal A and B patients had significantly lower rates of pCR (6.1 and 8.7 %, respectively) than either basal (37.1 %) or HER2 (55.0 %) patients (p < 0.001). The probability of pCR significantly decreased with tumor size >5 cm [p = 0.022, odds ratio (OR) 0.58, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.36, 0.93]. This relationship was statistically significant in the Basal (p = 0.026, OR 0.46, 95 % CI 0.23, 0.91) and HER2 (p = 0.039, OR 0.36, 95 % CI 0.14, 0.95) subgroups. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, the dichotomized tumor size variable was not significant in any of the molecular subgroups. DISCUSSION: Even though tumor size would intuitively be a clinical determinant of pCR, the current analysis showed that the adjusted OR for tumor size was not statistically significant in any of the molecular subgroups. Factors significantly associated with pCR were PR status, grade, lymph node status, and BluePrint molecular subtyping, which had the strongest correlation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4819747 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48197472016-04-10 Impact of Tumor Size on Probability of Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Baron, Paul Beitsch, Peter Boselli, Danielle Symanowski, James Pellicane, James V. Beatty, Jennifer Richards, Paul Mislowsky, Angela Nash, Charles Lee, Laura A. Murray, Mary de Snoo, Femke A. Stork-Sloots, Lisette Gittleman, Mark Akbari, Stephanie Whitworth, Pat Ann Surg Oncol Breast Oncology BACKGROUND: The prospective Neoadjuvant Breast Symphony Trial (NBRST) study found that MammaPrint/BluePrint functional molecular subtype is superior to conventional immunohistochemistry/fluorescence in situ hybridization subtyping for predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The purpose of this substudy was to determine if the rate of pCR is affected by tumor size. METHODS: The NBRST study includes breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. MammaPrint/BluePrint subtyping classified patients into four molecular subgroups: Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2), and Basal type. Probability of pCR (ypT0/isN0) as a function of tumor size and molecular subgroup was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 608 patients were evaluable with overall pCR rates of 28.5 %. Luminal A and B patients had significantly lower rates of pCR (6.1 and 8.7 %, respectively) than either basal (37.1 %) or HER2 (55.0 %) patients (p < 0.001). The probability of pCR significantly decreased with tumor size >5 cm [p = 0.022, odds ratio (OR) 0.58, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.36, 0.93]. This relationship was statistically significant in the Basal (p = 0.026, OR 0.46, 95 % CI 0.23, 0.91) and HER2 (p = 0.039, OR 0.36, 95 % CI 0.14, 0.95) subgroups. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, the dichotomized tumor size variable was not significant in any of the molecular subgroups. DISCUSSION: Even though tumor size would intuitively be a clinical determinant of pCR, the current analysis showed that the adjusted OR for tumor size was not statistically significant in any of the molecular subgroups. Factors significantly associated with pCR were PR status, grade, lymph node status, and BluePrint molecular subtyping, which had the strongest correlation. Springer International Publishing 2015-12-29 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4819747/ /pubmed/26714960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-5030-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Breast Oncology Baron, Paul Beitsch, Peter Boselli, Danielle Symanowski, James Pellicane, James V. Beatty, Jennifer Richards, Paul Mislowsky, Angela Nash, Charles Lee, Laura A. Murray, Mary de Snoo, Femke A. Stork-Sloots, Lisette Gittleman, Mark Akbari, Stephanie Whitworth, Pat Impact of Tumor Size on Probability of Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy |
title | Impact of Tumor Size on Probability of Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy |
title_full | Impact of Tumor Size on Probability of Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy |
title_fullStr | Impact of Tumor Size on Probability of Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Tumor Size on Probability of Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy |
title_short | Impact of Tumor Size on Probability of Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy |
title_sort | impact of tumor size on probability of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy |
topic | Breast Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4819747/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26714960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-5030-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baronpaul impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy AT beitschpeter impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy AT bosellidanielle impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy AT symanowskijames impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy AT pellicanejamesv impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy AT beattyjennifer impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy AT richardspaul impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy AT mislowskyangela impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy AT nashcharles impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy AT leelauraa impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy AT murraymary impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy AT desnoofemkea impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy AT storkslootslisette impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy AT gittlemanmark impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy AT akbaristephanie impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy AT whitworthpat impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy |