Cargando…

Impact of Tumor Size on Probability of Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND: The prospective Neoadjuvant Breast Symphony Trial (NBRST) study found that MammaPrint/BluePrint functional molecular subtype is superior to conventional immunohistochemistry/fluorescence in situ hybridization subtyping for predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baron, Paul, Beitsch, Peter, Boselli, Danielle, Symanowski, James, Pellicane, James V., Beatty, Jennifer, Richards, Paul, Mislowsky, Angela, Nash, Charles, Lee, Laura A., Murray, Mary, de Snoo, Femke A., Stork-Sloots, Lisette, Gittleman, Mark, Akbari, Stephanie, Whitworth, Pat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4819747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26714960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-5030-1
_version_ 1782425273743966208
author Baron, Paul
Beitsch, Peter
Boselli, Danielle
Symanowski, James
Pellicane, James V.
Beatty, Jennifer
Richards, Paul
Mislowsky, Angela
Nash, Charles
Lee, Laura A.
Murray, Mary
de Snoo, Femke A.
Stork-Sloots, Lisette
Gittleman, Mark
Akbari, Stephanie
Whitworth, Pat
author_facet Baron, Paul
Beitsch, Peter
Boselli, Danielle
Symanowski, James
Pellicane, James V.
Beatty, Jennifer
Richards, Paul
Mislowsky, Angela
Nash, Charles
Lee, Laura A.
Murray, Mary
de Snoo, Femke A.
Stork-Sloots, Lisette
Gittleman, Mark
Akbari, Stephanie
Whitworth, Pat
author_sort Baron, Paul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prospective Neoadjuvant Breast Symphony Trial (NBRST) study found that MammaPrint/BluePrint functional molecular subtype is superior to conventional immunohistochemistry/fluorescence in situ hybridization subtyping for predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The purpose of this substudy was to determine if the rate of pCR is affected by tumor size. METHODS: The NBRST study includes breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. MammaPrint/BluePrint subtyping classified patients into four molecular subgroups: Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2), and Basal type. Probability of pCR (ypT0/isN0) as a function of tumor size and molecular subgroup was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 608 patients were evaluable with overall pCR rates of 28.5 %. Luminal A and B patients had significantly lower rates of pCR (6.1 and 8.7 %, respectively) than either basal (37.1 %) or HER2 (55.0 %) patients (p < 0.001). The probability of pCR significantly decreased with tumor size >5 cm [p = 0.022, odds ratio (OR) 0.58, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.36, 0.93]. This relationship was statistically significant in the Basal (p = 0.026, OR 0.46, 95 % CI 0.23, 0.91) and HER2 (p = 0.039, OR 0.36, 95 % CI 0.14, 0.95) subgroups. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, the dichotomized tumor size variable was not significant in any of the molecular subgroups. DISCUSSION: Even though tumor size would intuitively be a clinical determinant of pCR, the current analysis showed that the adjusted OR for tumor size was not statistically significant in any of the molecular subgroups. Factors significantly associated with pCR were PR status, grade, lymph node status, and BluePrint molecular subtyping, which had the strongest correlation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4819747
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48197472016-04-10 Impact of Tumor Size on Probability of Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Baron, Paul Beitsch, Peter Boselli, Danielle Symanowski, James Pellicane, James V. Beatty, Jennifer Richards, Paul Mislowsky, Angela Nash, Charles Lee, Laura A. Murray, Mary de Snoo, Femke A. Stork-Sloots, Lisette Gittleman, Mark Akbari, Stephanie Whitworth, Pat Ann Surg Oncol Breast Oncology BACKGROUND: The prospective Neoadjuvant Breast Symphony Trial (NBRST) study found that MammaPrint/BluePrint functional molecular subtype is superior to conventional immunohistochemistry/fluorescence in situ hybridization subtyping for predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The purpose of this substudy was to determine if the rate of pCR is affected by tumor size. METHODS: The NBRST study includes breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. MammaPrint/BluePrint subtyping classified patients into four molecular subgroups: Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2), and Basal type. Probability of pCR (ypT0/isN0) as a function of tumor size and molecular subgroup was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 608 patients were evaluable with overall pCR rates of 28.5 %. Luminal A and B patients had significantly lower rates of pCR (6.1 and 8.7 %, respectively) than either basal (37.1 %) or HER2 (55.0 %) patients (p < 0.001). The probability of pCR significantly decreased with tumor size >5 cm [p = 0.022, odds ratio (OR) 0.58, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.36, 0.93]. This relationship was statistically significant in the Basal (p = 0.026, OR 0.46, 95 % CI 0.23, 0.91) and HER2 (p = 0.039, OR 0.36, 95 % CI 0.14, 0.95) subgroups. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, the dichotomized tumor size variable was not significant in any of the molecular subgroups. DISCUSSION: Even though tumor size would intuitively be a clinical determinant of pCR, the current analysis showed that the adjusted OR for tumor size was not statistically significant in any of the molecular subgroups. Factors significantly associated with pCR were PR status, grade, lymph node status, and BluePrint molecular subtyping, which had the strongest correlation. Springer International Publishing 2015-12-29 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4819747/ /pubmed/26714960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-5030-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Breast Oncology
Baron, Paul
Beitsch, Peter
Boselli, Danielle
Symanowski, James
Pellicane, James V.
Beatty, Jennifer
Richards, Paul
Mislowsky, Angela
Nash, Charles
Lee, Laura A.
Murray, Mary
de Snoo, Femke A.
Stork-Sloots, Lisette
Gittleman, Mark
Akbari, Stephanie
Whitworth, Pat
Impact of Tumor Size on Probability of Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
title Impact of Tumor Size on Probability of Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
title_full Impact of Tumor Size on Probability of Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
title_fullStr Impact of Tumor Size on Probability of Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Tumor Size on Probability of Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
title_short Impact of Tumor Size on Probability of Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
title_sort impact of tumor size on probability of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
topic Breast Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4819747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26714960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-5030-1
work_keys_str_mv AT baronpaul impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT beitschpeter impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT bosellidanielle impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT symanowskijames impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT pellicanejamesv impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT beattyjennifer impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT richardspaul impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT mislowskyangela impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT nashcharles impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT leelauraa impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT murraymary impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT desnoofemkea impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT storkslootslisette impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT gittlemanmark impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT akbaristephanie impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT whitworthpat impactoftumorsizeonprobabilityofpathologiccompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy