Cargando…

Review of genotoxicity biomonitoring studies of glyphosate-based formulations

Human and environmental genotoxicity biomonitoring studies involving exposure to glyphosate-based formulations (GBFs) were reviewed to complement an earlier review of experimental genotoxicity studies of glyphosate and GBFs. The environmental and most of the human biomonitoring studies were not info...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kier, Larry D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4819812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25687244
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10408444.2015.1010194
_version_ 1782425288985018368
author Kier, Larry D.
author_facet Kier, Larry D.
author_sort Kier, Larry D.
collection PubMed
description Human and environmental genotoxicity biomonitoring studies involving exposure to glyphosate-based formulations (GBFs) were reviewed to complement an earlier review of experimental genotoxicity studies of glyphosate and GBFs. The environmental and most of the human biomonitoring studies were not informative because there was either a very low frequency of GBF exposure or exposure to a large number of pesticides without analysis of specific pesticide effects. One pesticide sprayer biomonitoring study indicated there was not a statistically significant relationship between frequency of GBF exposure reported for the last spraying season and oxidative DNA damage. There were three studies of human populations in regions of GBF aerial spraying. One study found increases for the cytokinesis-block micronucleus endpoint but these increases did not show statistically significant associations with self-reported spray exposure and were not consistent with application rates. A second study found increases for the blood cell comet endpoint at high exposures causing toxicity. However, a follow-up to this study 2 years after spraying did not indicate chromosomal effects. The results of the biomonitoring studies do not contradict an earlier conclusion derived from experimental genotoxicity studies that typical GBFs do not appear to present significant genotoxic risk under normal conditions of human or environmental exposures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4819812
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48198122016-04-22 Review of genotoxicity biomonitoring studies of glyphosate-based formulations Kier, Larry D. Crit Rev Toxicol Review Articles Human and environmental genotoxicity biomonitoring studies involving exposure to glyphosate-based formulations (GBFs) were reviewed to complement an earlier review of experimental genotoxicity studies of glyphosate and GBFs. The environmental and most of the human biomonitoring studies were not informative because there was either a very low frequency of GBF exposure or exposure to a large number of pesticides without analysis of specific pesticide effects. One pesticide sprayer biomonitoring study indicated there was not a statistically significant relationship between frequency of GBF exposure reported for the last spraying season and oxidative DNA damage. There were three studies of human populations in regions of GBF aerial spraying. One study found increases for the cytokinesis-block micronucleus endpoint but these increases did not show statistically significant associations with self-reported spray exposure and were not consistent with application rates. A second study found increases for the blood cell comet endpoint at high exposures causing toxicity. However, a follow-up to this study 2 years after spraying did not indicate chromosomal effects. The results of the biomonitoring studies do not contradict an earlier conclusion derived from experimental genotoxicity studies that typical GBFs do not appear to present significant genotoxic risk under normal conditions of human or environmental exposures. Taylor & Francis 2015-03-16 2015-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4819812/ /pubmed/25687244 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10408444.2015.1010194 Text en © 2015 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Kier, Larry D.
Review of genotoxicity biomonitoring studies of glyphosate-based formulations
title Review of genotoxicity biomonitoring studies of glyphosate-based formulations
title_full Review of genotoxicity biomonitoring studies of glyphosate-based formulations
title_fullStr Review of genotoxicity biomonitoring studies of glyphosate-based formulations
title_full_unstemmed Review of genotoxicity biomonitoring studies of glyphosate-based formulations
title_short Review of genotoxicity biomonitoring studies of glyphosate-based formulations
title_sort review of genotoxicity biomonitoring studies of glyphosate-based formulations
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4819812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25687244
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10408444.2015.1010194
work_keys_str_mv AT kierlarryd reviewofgenotoxicitybiomonitoringstudiesofglyphosatebasedformulations