Cargando…
Review of genotoxicity biomonitoring studies of glyphosate-based formulations
Human and environmental genotoxicity biomonitoring studies involving exposure to glyphosate-based formulations (GBFs) were reviewed to complement an earlier review of experimental genotoxicity studies of glyphosate and GBFs. The environmental and most of the human biomonitoring studies were not info...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4819812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25687244 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10408444.2015.1010194 |
_version_ | 1782425288985018368 |
---|---|
author | Kier, Larry D. |
author_facet | Kier, Larry D. |
author_sort | Kier, Larry D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Human and environmental genotoxicity biomonitoring studies involving exposure to glyphosate-based formulations (GBFs) were reviewed to complement an earlier review of experimental genotoxicity studies of glyphosate and GBFs. The environmental and most of the human biomonitoring studies were not informative because there was either a very low frequency of GBF exposure or exposure to a large number of pesticides without analysis of specific pesticide effects. One pesticide sprayer biomonitoring study indicated there was not a statistically significant relationship between frequency of GBF exposure reported for the last spraying season and oxidative DNA damage. There were three studies of human populations in regions of GBF aerial spraying. One study found increases for the cytokinesis-block micronucleus endpoint but these increases did not show statistically significant associations with self-reported spray exposure and were not consistent with application rates. A second study found increases for the blood cell comet endpoint at high exposures causing toxicity. However, a follow-up to this study 2 years after spraying did not indicate chromosomal effects. The results of the biomonitoring studies do not contradict an earlier conclusion derived from experimental genotoxicity studies that typical GBFs do not appear to present significant genotoxic risk under normal conditions of human or environmental exposures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4819812 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48198122016-04-22 Review of genotoxicity biomonitoring studies of glyphosate-based formulations Kier, Larry D. Crit Rev Toxicol Review Articles Human and environmental genotoxicity biomonitoring studies involving exposure to glyphosate-based formulations (GBFs) were reviewed to complement an earlier review of experimental genotoxicity studies of glyphosate and GBFs. The environmental and most of the human biomonitoring studies were not informative because there was either a very low frequency of GBF exposure or exposure to a large number of pesticides without analysis of specific pesticide effects. One pesticide sprayer biomonitoring study indicated there was not a statistically significant relationship between frequency of GBF exposure reported for the last spraying season and oxidative DNA damage. There were three studies of human populations in regions of GBF aerial spraying. One study found increases for the cytokinesis-block micronucleus endpoint but these increases did not show statistically significant associations with self-reported spray exposure and were not consistent with application rates. A second study found increases for the blood cell comet endpoint at high exposures causing toxicity. However, a follow-up to this study 2 years after spraying did not indicate chromosomal effects. The results of the biomonitoring studies do not contradict an earlier conclusion derived from experimental genotoxicity studies that typical GBFs do not appear to present significant genotoxic risk under normal conditions of human or environmental exposures. Taylor & Francis 2015-03-16 2015-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4819812/ /pubmed/25687244 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10408444.2015.1010194 Text en © 2015 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Kier, Larry D. Review of genotoxicity biomonitoring studies of glyphosate-based formulations |
title | Review of genotoxicity biomonitoring studies of glyphosate-based formulations |
title_full | Review of genotoxicity biomonitoring studies of glyphosate-based formulations |
title_fullStr | Review of genotoxicity biomonitoring studies of glyphosate-based formulations |
title_full_unstemmed | Review of genotoxicity biomonitoring studies of glyphosate-based formulations |
title_short | Review of genotoxicity biomonitoring studies of glyphosate-based formulations |
title_sort | review of genotoxicity biomonitoring studies of glyphosate-based formulations |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4819812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25687244 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10408444.2015.1010194 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kierlarryd reviewofgenotoxicitybiomonitoringstudiesofglyphosatebasedformulations |