Cargando…

The Effect of Religion on Candidate Preference in the 2008 and 2012 Republican Presidential Primaries

Thanks to the work of politics and religion scholars, we now know a lot about the relationship between religion and voting in American presidential general elections. However, we know less about the influence of religion on individual vote choice in presidential primaries. This article fills that ga...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Bradberry, Leigh A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4820110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27043438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152037
_version_ 1782425337588613120
author Bradberry, Leigh A.
author_facet Bradberry, Leigh A.
author_sort Bradberry, Leigh A.
collection PubMed
description Thanks to the work of politics and religion scholars, we now know a lot about the relationship between religion and voting in American presidential general elections. However, we know less about the influence of religion on individual vote choice in presidential primaries. This article fills that gap by exploring the relationship between religion and candidate preference in the 2008 and 2012 Republican primaries. Using pre-Super Tuesday surveys conducted by the Pew Research Center, I find that the Republican candidate who most explicitly appealed to religious voters (Mike Huckabee in 2008 and Rick Santorum in 2012) was the preferred candidate of Republican respondents who attended religious services at the highest levels, and that as attendance increased, so did the likelihood of preferring that candidate. I also find that identification as a born again Christian mattered to candidate preference. Specifically, born again Christians were more likely than non-born again Christians to prefer Huckabee to Mitt Romney, John McCain and Ron Paul in 2008, and Santorum to Romney in 2012. Although ideology was not the primary subject of this article, I find that ideology was also a statistically significant predictor of Republican candidate preference in both 2008 and 2012. This robust finding reinforces scholars’ prior work on the importance of ideology in explaining presidential primary vote choice. The overall findings of the paper provide evidence that religion variables can add to our understanding of why voters prefer one candidate over another in presidential primaries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4820110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48201102016-04-22 The Effect of Religion on Candidate Preference in the 2008 and 2012 Republican Presidential Primaries Bradberry, Leigh A. PLoS One Research Article Thanks to the work of politics and religion scholars, we now know a lot about the relationship between religion and voting in American presidential general elections. However, we know less about the influence of religion on individual vote choice in presidential primaries. This article fills that gap by exploring the relationship between religion and candidate preference in the 2008 and 2012 Republican primaries. Using pre-Super Tuesday surveys conducted by the Pew Research Center, I find that the Republican candidate who most explicitly appealed to religious voters (Mike Huckabee in 2008 and Rick Santorum in 2012) was the preferred candidate of Republican respondents who attended religious services at the highest levels, and that as attendance increased, so did the likelihood of preferring that candidate. I also find that identification as a born again Christian mattered to candidate preference. Specifically, born again Christians were more likely than non-born again Christians to prefer Huckabee to Mitt Romney, John McCain and Ron Paul in 2008, and Santorum to Romney in 2012. Although ideology was not the primary subject of this article, I find that ideology was also a statistically significant predictor of Republican candidate preference in both 2008 and 2012. This robust finding reinforces scholars’ prior work on the importance of ideology in explaining presidential primary vote choice. The overall findings of the paper provide evidence that religion variables can add to our understanding of why voters prefer one candidate over another in presidential primaries. Public Library of Science 2016-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4820110/ /pubmed/27043438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152037 Text en © 2016 Leigh A. Bradberry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bradberry, Leigh A.
The Effect of Religion on Candidate Preference in the 2008 and 2012 Republican Presidential Primaries
title The Effect of Religion on Candidate Preference in the 2008 and 2012 Republican Presidential Primaries
title_full The Effect of Religion on Candidate Preference in the 2008 and 2012 Republican Presidential Primaries
title_fullStr The Effect of Religion on Candidate Preference in the 2008 and 2012 Republican Presidential Primaries
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Religion on Candidate Preference in the 2008 and 2012 Republican Presidential Primaries
title_short The Effect of Religion on Candidate Preference in the 2008 and 2012 Republican Presidential Primaries
title_sort effect of religion on candidate preference in the 2008 and 2012 republican presidential primaries
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4820110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27043438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152037
work_keys_str_mv AT bradberryleigha theeffectofreligiononcandidatepreferenceinthe2008and2012republicanpresidentialprimaries
AT bradberryleigha effectofreligiononcandidatepreferenceinthe2008and2012republicanpresidentialprimaries