Cargando…

Comparison of a Web-Based Dietary Assessment Tool with Software for the Evaluation of Dietary Records

BACKGROUND: Dietary assessment in clinical practice is performed by means of computer support, either in the form of a web-based tool or software. The aim of the paper is to present the results of the comparison of a Slovenian web-based tool with German software for the evaluation of four-day weight...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: BENEDIK, Evgen, KOROUŠIĆ SELJAK, Barbara, HRIBAR, Maša, ROGELJ, Irena, BRATANIČ, Borut, OREL, Rok, FIDLER MIS, Nataša
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter Open 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4820173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27646914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/sjph-2015-0014
_version_ 1782425350904479744
author BENEDIK, Evgen
KOROUŠIĆ SELJAK, Barbara
HRIBAR, Maša
ROGELJ, Irena
BRATANIČ, Borut
OREL, Rok
FIDLER MIS, Nataša
author_facet BENEDIK, Evgen
KOROUŠIĆ SELJAK, Barbara
HRIBAR, Maša
ROGELJ, Irena
BRATANIČ, Borut
OREL, Rok
FIDLER MIS, Nataša
author_sort BENEDIK, Evgen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dietary assessment in clinical practice is performed by means of computer support, either in the form of a web-based tool or software. The aim of the paper is to present the results of the comparison of a Slovenian web-based tool with German software for the evaluation of four-day weighted paper-and-pencil-based dietary records (paper-DRs) in pregnant women. METHODS: A volunteer group of pregnant women (n=63) completed paper-DRs. These records were entered by an experienced research dietitian into a web-based application (Open Platform for Clinical Nutrition, OPEN, http://opkp.si/en, Ljubljana, Slovenia) and software application (Prodi 5.7 Expert plus, Nutri-Science, Stuttgart, Germany, 2011). The results for calculated energy intake, as well as 45 macro- and micronutrient intakes, were statistically compared by using the non-parametric Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. The cut-off for Spearman’s rho was set at >0.600. RESULTS: 12 nutritional parameters (energy, carbohydrates, fat, protein, water, potassium, calcium, phosphorus, dietary fiber, vitamin C, folic acid, and stearic acid) were in high correlation (>0.800), 18 in moderate (0.600–0.799), 11 in weak correlation (0.400–0.599), while 5 (arachidonic acid, niacin, alpha-linolenic acid, fluoride, total sugars) did not show any statistical correlation. CONCLUSION: Comparison of the results of the evaluation of dietary records using a web-based dietary assessment tool with those using software shows that there is a high correlation for energy and macronutrient content.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4820173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher De Gruyter Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48201732016-04-20 Comparison of a Web-Based Dietary Assessment Tool with Software for the Evaluation of Dietary Records BENEDIK, Evgen KOROUŠIĆ SELJAK, Barbara HRIBAR, Maša ROGELJ, Irena BRATANIČ, Borut OREL, Rok FIDLER MIS, Nataša Zdr Varst Original Scientific Article BACKGROUND: Dietary assessment in clinical practice is performed by means of computer support, either in the form of a web-based tool or software. The aim of the paper is to present the results of the comparison of a Slovenian web-based tool with German software for the evaluation of four-day weighted paper-and-pencil-based dietary records (paper-DRs) in pregnant women. METHODS: A volunteer group of pregnant women (n=63) completed paper-DRs. These records were entered by an experienced research dietitian into a web-based application (Open Platform for Clinical Nutrition, OPEN, http://opkp.si/en, Ljubljana, Slovenia) and software application (Prodi 5.7 Expert plus, Nutri-Science, Stuttgart, Germany, 2011). The results for calculated energy intake, as well as 45 macro- and micronutrient intakes, were statistically compared by using the non-parametric Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. The cut-off for Spearman’s rho was set at >0.600. RESULTS: 12 nutritional parameters (energy, carbohydrates, fat, protein, water, potassium, calcium, phosphorus, dietary fiber, vitamin C, folic acid, and stearic acid) were in high correlation (>0.800), 18 in moderate (0.600–0.799), 11 in weak correlation (0.400–0.599), while 5 (arachidonic acid, niacin, alpha-linolenic acid, fluoride, total sugars) did not show any statistical correlation. CONCLUSION: Comparison of the results of the evaluation of dietary records using a web-based dietary assessment tool with those using software shows that there is a high correlation for energy and macronutrient content. De Gruyter Open 2015-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4820173/ /pubmed/27646914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/sjph-2015-0014 Text en © National Institution of Public Health, Slovenia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).
spellingShingle Original Scientific Article
BENEDIK, Evgen
KOROUŠIĆ SELJAK, Barbara
HRIBAR, Maša
ROGELJ, Irena
BRATANIČ, Borut
OREL, Rok
FIDLER MIS, Nataša
Comparison of a Web-Based Dietary Assessment Tool with Software for the Evaluation of Dietary Records
title Comparison of a Web-Based Dietary Assessment Tool with Software for the Evaluation of Dietary Records
title_full Comparison of a Web-Based Dietary Assessment Tool with Software for the Evaluation of Dietary Records
title_fullStr Comparison of a Web-Based Dietary Assessment Tool with Software for the Evaluation of Dietary Records
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of a Web-Based Dietary Assessment Tool with Software for the Evaluation of Dietary Records
title_short Comparison of a Web-Based Dietary Assessment Tool with Software for the Evaluation of Dietary Records
title_sort comparison of a web-based dietary assessment tool with software for the evaluation of dietary records
topic Original Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4820173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27646914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/sjph-2015-0014
work_keys_str_mv AT benedikevgen comparisonofawebbaseddietaryassessmenttoolwithsoftwarefortheevaluationofdietaryrecords
AT korousicseljakbarbara comparisonofawebbaseddietaryassessmenttoolwithsoftwarefortheevaluationofdietaryrecords
AT hribarmasa comparisonofawebbaseddietaryassessmenttoolwithsoftwarefortheevaluationofdietaryrecords
AT rogeljirena comparisonofawebbaseddietaryassessmenttoolwithsoftwarefortheevaluationofdietaryrecords
AT bratanicborut comparisonofawebbaseddietaryassessmenttoolwithsoftwarefortheevaluationofdietaryrecords
AT orelrok comparisonofawebbaseddietaryassessmenttoolwithsoftwarefortheevaluationofdietaryrecords
AT fidlermisnatasa comparisonofawebbaseddietaryassessmenttoolwithsoftwarefortheevaluationofdietaryrecords