Cargando…

Dual N-Back Working Memory Training in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Comparison to Processing Speed Training

Enhancing cognitive ability is an attractive concept, particularly for middle-aged adults interested in maintaining cognitive functioning and preventing age-related declines. Computerized working memory training has been investigated as a safe method of cognitive enhancement in younger and older adu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lawlor-Savage, Linette, Goghari, Vina M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4820261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27043141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151817
_version_ 1782425369175916544
author Lawlor-Savage, Linette
Goghari, Vina M.
author_facet Lawlor-Savage, Linette
Goghari, Vina M.
author_sort Lawlor-Savage, Linette
collection PubMed
description Enhancing cognitive ability is an attractive concept, particularly for middle-aged adults interested in maintaining cognitive functioning and preventing age-related declines. Computerized working memory training has been investigated as a safe method of cognitive enhancement in younger and older adults, although few studies have considered the potential impact of working memory training on middle-aged adults. This study investigated dual n-back working memory training in healthy adults aged 30–60. Fifty-seven adults completed measures of working memory, processing speed, and fluid intelligence before and after a 5-week web-based dual n-back or active control (processing speed) training program. Results: Repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance failed to identify improvements across the three cognitive composites, working memory, processing speed, and fluid intelligence, after training. Follow-up Bayesian analyses supported null findings for training effects for each individual composite. Findings suggest that dual n-back working memory training may not benefit working memory or fluid intelligence in healthy adults. Further investigation is necessary to clarify if other forms of working memory training may be beneficial, and what factors impact training-related benefits, should they occur, in this population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4820261
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48202612016-04-22 Dual N-Back Working Memory Training in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Comparison to Processing Speed Training Lawlor-Savage, Linette Goghari, Vina M. PLoS One Research Article Enhancing cognitive ability is an attractive concept, particularly for middle-aged adults interested in maintaining cognitive functioning and preventing age-related declines. Computerized working memory training has been investigated as a safe method of cognitive enhancement in younger and older adults, although few studies have considered the potential impact of working memory training on middle-aged adults. This study investigated dual n-back working memory training in healthy adults aged 30–60. Fifty-seven adults completed measures of working memory, processing speed, and fluid intelligence before and after a 5-week web-based dual n-back or active control (processing speed) training program. Results: Repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance failed to identify improvements across the three cognitive composites, working memory, processing speed, and fluid intelligence, after training. Follow-up Bayesian analyses supported null findings for training effects for each individual composite. Findings suggest that dual n-back working memory training may not benefit working memory or fluid intelligence in healthy adults. Further investigation is necessary to clarify if other forms of working memory training may be beneficial, and what factors impact training-related benefits, should they occur, in this population. Public Library of Science 2016-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4820261/ /pubmed/27043141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151817 Text en © 2016 Lawlor-Savage, Goghari http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lawlor-Savage, Linette
Goghari, Vina M.
Dual N-Back Working Memory Training in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Comparison to Processing Speed Training
title Dual N-Back Working Memory Training in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Comparison to Processing Speed Training
title_full Dual N-Back Working Memory Training in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Comparison to Processing Speed Training
title_fullStr Dual N-Back Working Memory Training in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Comparison to Processing Speed Training
title_full_unstemmed Dual N-Back Working Memory Training in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Comparison to Processing Speed Training
title_short Dual N-Back Working Memory Training in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Comparison to Processing Speed Training
title_sort dual n-back working memory training in healthy adults: a randomized comparison to processing speed training
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4820261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27043141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151817
work_keys_str_mv AT lawlorsavagelinette dualnbackworkingmemorytraininginhealthyadultsarandomizedcomparisontoprocessingspeedtraining
AT gogharivinam dualnbackworkingmemorytraininginhealthyadultsarandomizedcomparisontoprocessingspeedtraining