Cargando…

Reappraisal of waist circumference cutoff value according to general obesity

BACKGROUND: Current criterion of waist circumference (WC) for abdominal obesity is not enough to demonstrate characteristics of obese and non-obese populations defined by BMI. The aim of this study was to redefine the cutoff values of WC according to general obesity (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m(2)). METHODS: The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Kyung-Soo, Oh, Hyun-Ju, Choi, Young Ju, Huh, Byung Wook, Kim, Soo-Kyung, Park, Seok Won, Lee, Eun Jig, Cho, Yong-Wook, Huh, Kap-Bum
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4820860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27051457
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12986-016-0085-y
_version_ 1782425481014935552
author Kim, Kyung-Soo
Oh, Hyun-Ju
Choi, Young Ju
Huh, Byung Wook
Kim, Soo-Kyung
Park, Seok Won
Lee, Eun Jig
Cho, Yong-Wook
Huh, Kap-Bum
author_facet Kim, Kyung-Soo
Oh, Hyun-Ju
Choi, Young Ju
Huh, Byung Wook
Kim, Soo-Kyung
Park, Seok Won
Lee, Eun Jig
Cho, Yong-Wook
Huh, Kap-Bum
author_sort Kim, Kyung-Soo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current criterion of waist circumference (WC) for abdominal obesity is not enough to demonstrate characteristics of obese and non-obese populations defined by BMI. The aim of this study was to redefine the cutoff values of WC according to general obesity (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m(2)). METHODS: The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine cutoff values of WC for predicting atherosclerosis according to BMI in 1,063 non-diabetic subjects. To validate this new criterion, diabetic patients (n = 3,690) were divided into three groups based on the current (WC of 90/80 cm for men/women) and new cutoff values of WC: 1) group with WC below the lowest value of two criteria; 2) intermediate group defined as having a WC between them; and 3) group with WC more than the highest value of them. RESULTS: The new cutoff values of WC for predicting atherosclerosis in non-diabetic subjects were 84/76 cm for non-obese men/women, and 93/87 cm for obese men/women, respectively. Of non-obese diabetic patients, the intermediate group (WC 84 ~ 90/76 ~ 80 cm for men/women) was more insulin resistant and showed elevated odds ratio (OR) for having 2 or more metabolic risk factors compared to group with WC below 84/76 cm for men/women [OR 2.48 (95 % CI 1.89–3.25) in men, 2.01 (95% CI 1.45–2.78) in women]. In contrast, among obese diabetic patients, insulin resistance and the likelihood of having 2 or more metabolic risk factors were not different from the intermediate group (WC 90 ~ 93/80 ~ 87 cm for men/women) and group with WC below 90/80 cm for men/women. CONCLUSIONS: The current universal cutoff values of WC may under- or over-estimate the metabolic risks of intermediate groups. Therefore, the WC criteria for abdominal obesity should be applied differently depending on the BMI. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12986-016-0085-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4820860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48208602016-04-06 Reappraisal of waist circumference cutoff value according to general obesity Kim, Kyung-Soo Oh, Hyun-Ju Choi, Young Ju Huh, Byung Wook Kim, Soo-Kyung Park, Seok Won Lee, Eun Jig Cho, Yong-Wook Huh, Kap-Bum Nutr Metab (Lond) Research BACKGROUND: Current criterion of waist circumference (WC) for abdominal obesity is not enough to demonstrate characteristics of obese and non-obese populations defined by BMI. The aim of this study was to redefine the cutoff values of WC according to general obesity (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m(2)). METHODS: The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine cutoff values of WC for predicting atherosclerosis according to BMI in 1,063 non-diabetic subjects. To validate this new criterion, diabetic patients (n = 3,690) were divided into three groups based on the current (WC of 90/80 cm for men/women) and new cutoff values of WC: 1) group with WC below the lowest value of two criteria; 2) intermediate group defined as having a WC between them; and 3) group with WC more than the highest value of them. RESULTS: The new cutoff values of WC for predicting atherosclerosis in non-diabetic subjects were 84/76 cm for non-obese men/women, and 93/87 cm for obese men/women, respectively. Of non-obese diabetic patients, the intermediate group (WC 84 ~ 90/76 ~ 80 cm for men/women) was more insulin resistant and showed elevated odds ratio (OR) for having 2 or more metabolic risk factors compared to group with WC below 84/76 cm for men/women [OR 2.48 (95 % CI 1.89–3.25) in men, 2.01 (95% CI 1.45–2.78) in women]. In contrast, among obese diabetic patients, insulin resistance and the likelihood of having 2 or more metabolic risk factors were not different from the intermediate group (WC 90 ~ 93/80 ~ 87 cm for men/women) and group with WC below 90/80 cm for men/women. CONCLUSIONS: The current universal cutoff values of WC may under- or over-estimate the metabolic risks of intermediate groups. Therefore, the WC criteria for abdominal obesity should be applied differently depending on the BMI. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12986-016-0085-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4820860/ /pubmed/27051457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12986-016-0085-y Text en © Kim et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kim, Kyung-Soo
Oh, Hyun-Ju
Choi, Young Ju
Huh, Byung Wook
Kim, Soo-Kyung
Park, Seok Won
Lee, Eun Jig
Cho, Yong-Wook
Huh, Kap-Bum
Reappraisal of waist circumference cutoff value according to general obesity
title Reappraisal of waist circumference cutoff value according to general obesity
title_full Reappraisal of waist circumference cutoff value according to general obesity
title_fullStr Reappraisal of waist circumference cutoff value according to general obesity
title_full_unstemmed Reappraisal of waist circumference cutoff value according to general obesity
title_short Reappraisal of waist circumference cutoff value according to general obesity
title_sort reappraisal of waist circumference cutoff value according to general obesity
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4820860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27051457
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12986-016-0085-y
work_keys_str_mv AT kimkyungsoo reappraisalofwaistcircumferencecutoffvalueaccordingtogeneralobesity
AT ohhyunju reappraisalofwaistcircumferencecutoffvalueaccordingtogeneralobesity
AT choiyoungju reappraisalofwaistcircumferencecutoffvalueaccordingtogeneralobesity
AT huhbyungwook reappraisalofwaistcircumferencecutoffvalueaccordingtogeneralobesity
AT kimsookyung reappraisalofwaistcircumferencecutoffvalueaccordingtogeneralobesity
AT parkseokwon reappraisalofwaistcircumferencecutoffvalueaccordingtogeneralobesity
AT leeeunjig reappraisalofwaistcircumferencecutoffvalueaccordingtogeneralobesity
AT choyongwook reappraisalofwaistcircumferencecutoffvalueaccordingtogeneralobesity
AT huhkapbum reappraisalofwaistcircumferencecutoffvalueaccordingtogeneralobesity