Cargando…

Where does selective laser trabeculoplasty stand now? A review

BACKGROUND: Chronic treatment of glaucoma can present a challenge in patients who lack the means and/or the discipline to use daily glaucoma medication. We wondered if selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) could be a useful alternative. METHODS: Inclusion criteria: controlled trials comparing effica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Keyser, Myrjam, De Belder, Maya, De Belder, Simon, De Groot, Veva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4820926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27051674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-016-0041-y
_version_ 1782425496823267328
author De Keyser, Myrjam
De Belder, Maya
De Belder, Simon
De Groot, Veva
author_facet De Keyser, Myrjam
De Belder, Maya
De Belder, Simon
De Groot, Veva
author_sort De Keyser, Myrjam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic treatment of glaucoma can present a challenge in patients who lack the means and/or the discipline to use daily glaucoma medication. We wondered if selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) could be a useful alternative. METHODS: Inclusion criteria: controlled trials comparing efficacy of SLT in adult patients with any form of open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and case reports on side effects of SLT. Two recent meta-analyses identified eight randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of SLT with medication (prostaglandin analogs) and with argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT). We took these eight RCTs as reference base and calculated their success rates where they were not given. Other articles were added to elaborate on technique and side effects. RESULTS: Mean intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction after SLT was 3.8–8.0 mmHg after 6 months to 1 year. Mean success rate of SLT at 6 months to 1 year is 55–82 %. Higher IOP before laser predicts a higher IOP-lowering effect. In terms of mean IOP reduction, reduction in number of medications and treatment success, the effect of SLT was found to show no clinically relevant difference from that of contemporary medication (prostaglandin analogs) and from ALT. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence indicates that SLT is an efficacious primary or adjunctive therapy for treating glaucoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4820926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48209262016-04-06 Where does selective laser trabeculoplasty stand now? A review De Keyser, Myrjam De Belder, Maya De Belder, Simon De Groot, Veva Eye Vis (Lond) Review BACKGROUND: Chronic treatment of glaucoma can present a challenge in patients who lack the means and/or the discipline to use daily glaucoma medication. We wondered if selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) could be a useful alternative. METHODS: Inclusion criteria: controlled trials comparing efficacy of SLT in adult patients with any form of open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and case reports on side effects of SLT. Two recent meta-analyses identified eight randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of SLT with medication (prostaglandin analogs) and with argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT). We took these eight RCTs as reference base and calculated their success rates where they were not given. Other articles were added to elaborate on technique and side effects. RESULTS: Mean intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction after SLT was 3.8–8.0 mmHg after 6 months to 1 year. Mean success rate of SLT at 6 months to 1 year is 55–82 %. Higher IOP before laser predicts a higher IOP-lowering effect. In terms of mean IOP reduction, reduction in number of medications and treatment success, the effect of SLT was found to show no clinically relevant difference from that of contemporary medication (prostaglandin analogs) and from ALT. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence indicates that SLT is an efficacious primary or adjunctive therapy for treating glaucoma. BioMed Central 2016-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4820926/ /pubmed/27051674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-016-0041-y Text en © De Keyser et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
De Keyser, Myrjam
De Belder, Maya
De Belder, Simon
De Groot, Veva
Where does selective laser trabeculoplasty stand now? A review
title Where does selective laser trabeculoplasty stand now? A review
title_full Where does selective laser trabeculoplasty stand now? A review
title_fullStr Where does selective laser trabeculoplasty stand now? A review
title_full_unstemmed Where does selective laser trabeculoplasty stand now? A review
title_short Where does selective laser trabeculoplasty stand now? A review
title_sort where does selective laser trabeculoplasty stand now? a review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4820926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27051674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-016-0041-y
work_keys_str_mv AT dekeysermyrjam wheredoesselectivelasertrabeculoplastystandnowareview
AT debeldermaya wheredoesselectivelasertrabeculoplastystandnowareview
AT debeldersimon wheredoesselectivelasertrabeculoplastystandnowareview
AT degrootveva wheredoesselectivelasertrabeculoplastystandnowareview