Cargando…
Where does selective laser trabeculoplasty stand now? A review
BACKGROUND: Chronic treatment of glaucoma can present a challenge in patients who lack the means and/or the discipline to use daily glaucoma medication. We wondered if selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) could be a useful alternative. METHODS: Inclusion criteria: controlled trials comparing effica...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4820926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27051674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-016-0041-y |
_version_ | 1782425496823267328 |
---|---|
author | De Keyser, Myrjam De Belder, Maya De Belder, Simon De Groot, Veva |
author_facet | De Keyser, Myrjam De Belder, Maya De Belder, Simon De Groot, Veva |
author_sort | De Keyser, Myrjam |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Chronic treatment of glaucoma can present a challenge in patients who lack the means and/or the discipline to use daily glaucoma medication. We wondered if selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) could be a useful alternative. METHODS: Inclusion criteria: controlled trials comparing efficacy of SLT in adult patients with any form of open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and case reports on side effects of SLT. Two recent meta-analyses identified eight randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of SLT with medication (prostaglandin analogs) and with argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT). We took these eight RCTs as reference base and calculated their success rates where they were not given. Other articles were added to elaborate on technique and side effects. RESULTS: Mean intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction after SLT was 3.8–8.0 mmHg after 6 months to 1 year. Mean success rate of SLT at 6 months to 1 year is 55–82 %. Higher IOP before laser predicts a higher IOP-lowering effect. In terms of mean IOP reduction, reduction in number of medications and treatment success, the effect of SLT was found to show no clinically relevant difference from that of contemporary medication (prostaglandin analogs) and from ALT. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence indicates that SLT is an efficacious primary or adjunctive therapy for treating glaucoma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4820926 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48209262016-04-06 Where does selective laser trabeculoplasty stand now? A review De Keyser, Myrjam De Belder, Maya De Belder, Simon De Groot, Veva Eye Vis (Lond) Review BACKGROUND: Chronic treatment of glaucoma can present a challenge in patients who lack the means and/or the discipline to use daily glaucoma medication. We wondered if selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) could be a useful alternative. METHODS: Inclusion criteria: controlled trials comparing efficacy of SLT in adult patients with any form of open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and case reports on side effects of SLT. Two recent meta-analyses identified eight randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of SLT with medication (prostaglandin analogs) and with argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT). We took these eight RCTs as reference base and calculated their success rates where they were not given. Other articles were added to elaborate on technique and side effects. RESULTS: Mean intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction after SLT was 3.8–8.0 mmHg after 6 months to 1 year. Mean success rate of SLT at 6 months to 1 year is 55–82 %. Higher IOP before laser predicts a higher IOP-lowering effect. In terms of mean IOP reduction, reduction in number of medications and treatment success, the effect of SLT was found to show no clinically relevant difference from that of contemporary medication (prostaglandin analogs) and from ALT. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence indicates that SLT is an efficacious primary or adjunctive therapy for treating glaucoma. BioMed Central 2016-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4820926/ /pubmed/27051674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-016-0041-y Text en © De Keyser et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review De Keyser, Myrjam De Belder, Maya De Belder, Simon De Groot, Veva Where does selective laser trabeculoplasty stand now? A review |
title | Where does selective laser trabeculoplasty stand now? A review |
title_full | Where does selective laser trabeculoplasty stand now? A review |
title_fullStr | Where does selective laser trabeculoplasty stand now? A review |
title_full_unstemmed | Where does selective laser trabeculoplasty stand now? A review |
title_short | Where does selective laser trabeculoplasty stand now? A review |
title_sort | where does selective laser trabeculoplasty stand now? a review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4820926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27051674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-016-0041-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dekeysermyrjam wheredoesselectivelasertrabeculoplastystandnowareview AT debeldermaya wheredoesselectivelasertrabeculoplastystandnowareview AT debeldersimon wheredoesselectivelasertrabeculoplastystandnowareview AT degrootveva wheredoesselectivelasertrabeculoplastystandnowareview |