Cargando…
Debate: what is the best method to monitor surgical performance?
BACKGROUND: There is considerable recent interest in the monitoring of individual surgeon or hospital surgical outcomes. If one aggregates data over time and assesses performance with a funnel plot, then the detection of any process deterioration or improvement could be delayed. The variable life ad...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4820954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27044248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-016-0131-8 |
_version_ | 1782425504935051264 |
---|---|
author | Steiner, Stefan H. Woodall, William H. |
author_facet | Steiner, Stefan H. Woodall, William H. |
author_sort | Steiner, Stefan H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is considerable recent interest in the monitoring of individual surgeon or hospital surgical outcomes. If one aggregates data over time and assesses performance with a funnel plot, then the detection of any process deterioration or improvement could be delayed. The variable life adjusted display (VLAD) is widely used for monitoring on a case-by-case basis, but we show that use of the risk-adjusted Bernoulli cumulative sum (RA-CUSUM) chart leads to much better performance. DISCUSSION: We use simulation to illustrate that the RA-CUSUM chart has better performance than the VLAD in detecting changes in the rates of adverse events. SUMMARY: We recommend the RA-CUSUM approach over the VLAD approach for monitoring surgical performance. If the VLAD is used, we recommend running the RA-CUSUM chart in the background to generate signals that the process performance has changed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4820954 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48209542016-04-06 Debate: what is the best method to monitor surgical performance? Steiner, Stefan H. Woodall, William H. BMC Surg Debate BACKGROUND: There is considerable recent interest in the monitoring of individual surgeon or hospital surgical outcomes. If one aggregates data over time and assesses performance with a funnel plot, then the detection of any process deterioration or improvement could be delayed. The variable life adjusted display (VLAD) is widely used for monitoring on a case-by-case basis, but we show that use of the risk-adjusted Bernoulli cumulative sum (RA-CUSUM) chart leads to much better performance. DISCUSSION: We use simulation to illustrate that the RA-CUSUM chart has better performance than the VLAD in detecting changes in the rates of adverse events. SUMMARY: We recommend the RA-CUSUM approach over the VLAD approach for monitoring surgical performance. If the VLAD is used, we recommend running the RA-CUSUM chart in the background to generate signals that the process performance has changed. BioMed Central 2016-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4820954/ /pubmed/27044248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-016-0131-8 Text en © Steiner and Woodall. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Debate Steiner, Stefan H. Woodall, William H. Debate: what is the best method to monitor surgical performance? |
title | Debate: what is the best method to monitor surgical performance? |
title_full | Debate: what is the best method to monitor surgical performance? |
title_fullStr | Debate: what is the best method to monitor surgical performance? |
title_full_unstemmed | Debate: what is the best method to monitor surgical performance? |
title_short | Debate: what is the best method to monitor surgical performance? |
title_sort | debate: what is the best method to monitor surgical performance? |
topic | Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4820954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27044248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-016-0131-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steinerstefanh debatewhatisthebestmethodtomonitorsurgicalperformance AT woodallwilliamh debatewhatisthebestmethodtomonitorsurgicalperformance |