Cargando…

Modeling factors explaining physicians’ satisfaction with competence

OBJECTIVE: Attention to physician wellness has increased as medical practice gains in complexity. Physician satisfaction with practice is critical for quality of care and practice growth. The purpose of this study was to model physicians’ self-reported Satisfaction with Competence as a function of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lepnurm, Rein, Dobson, Roy Thomas, Peña-Sánchez, Juan-Nicolás, Nesdole, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4821212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27092256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312115613352
_version_ 1782425542677495808
author Lepnurm, Rein
Dobson, Roy Thomas
Peña-Sánchez, Juan-Nicolás
Nesdole, Robert
author_facet Lepnurm, Rein
Dobson, Roy Thomas
Peña-Sánchez, Juan-Nicolás
Nesdole, Robert
author_sort Lepnurm, Rein
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Attention to physician wellness has increased as medical practice gains in complexity. Physician satisfaction with practice is critical for quality of care and practice growth. The purpose of this study was to model physicians’ self-reported Satisfaction with Competence as a function of their perceptions of the Quality of Health Services, Distress, Coping, Practice Management, Personal Satisfaction and Professional Equity. METHODS: Comprehensive questionnaires were sent to a stratified sample of 5300 physicians across Canada. This cross-sectional study focused on physicians who examined and treated individual patients for a final study population of 2639 physicians. Response bias was negligible. The questionnaires contained measures of Satisfaction with Competence, Quality of Health Services, Distress, Coping, Personal Satisfaction, Practice Management and Professional Equity. Exploring relationships was done using Pearson correlations and one-way analysis of variance. Modeling was by hierarchical regressions. RESULTS: The measures were reliable: Satisfaction with Competence (α = .86), Quality (α = .86), Access (α = .82), Distress (α = .82), Coping (α = .76), Personal Satisfaction (α = .78), Practice Management (α = .89) and the dimensions of Professional Equity (Fulfillment, α = .81; Financial, α = .93; and Recognition, α = .75) with comparative validity. Satisfaction with Competence was positively correlated with Quality (r = .32), Efficiency (r = .37) and Access (r = .32); negatively correlated with Distress (r = −.54); and positively correlated with Coping strategies (r = .43), Personal Satisfaction (r = .57), Practice Management (r = .17), Fulfillment (r = .53), Financial (r = .36) and Recognition (r = .54). Physicians’ perceptions on Quality, Efficiency, Access, Distress, Coping, Personal Satisfaction, Practice Management, Fulfillment, Pay and Recognition explained 60.2% of the variation in Satisfaction with Competence, controlling for years in practice, self-reported health and duties of physicians. CONCLUSION: Satisfaction with Competence could be affected by excessive accumulation of duties, concerns about quality, efficiency, access, excessive distress, inadequate coping abilities, personal satisfaction with life as a physician, challenges in managing practices and persistent inequities among physicians.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4821212
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48212122016-04-18 Modeling factors explaining physicians’ satisfaction with competence Lepnurm, Rein Dobson, Roy Thomas Peña-Sánchez, Juan-Nicolás Nesdole, Robert SAGE Open Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: Attention to physician wellness has increased as medical practice gains in complexity. Physician satisfaction with practice is critical for quality of care and practice growth. The purpose of this study was to model physicians’ self-reported Satisfaction with Competence as a function of their perceptions of the Quality of Health Services, Distress, Coping, Practice Management, Personal Satisfaction and Professional Equity. METHODS: Comprehensive questionnaires were sent to a stratified sample of 5300 physicians across Canada. This cross-sectional study focused on physicians who examined and treated individual patients for a final study population of 2639 physicians. Response bias was negligible. The questionnaires contained measures of Satisfaction with Competence, Quality of Health Services, Distress, Coping, Personal Satisfaction, Practice Management and Professional Equity. Exploring relationships was done using Pearson correlations and one-way analysis of variance. Modeling was by hierarchical regressions. RESULTS: The measures were reliable: Satisfaction with Competence (α = .86), Quality (α = .86), Access (α = .82), Distress (α = .82), Coping (α = .76), Personal Satisfaction (α = .78), Practice Management (α = .89) and the dimensions of Professional Equity (Fulfillment, α = .81; Financial, α = .93; and Recognition, α = .75) with comparative validity. Satisfaction with Competence was positively correlated with Quality (r = .32), Efficiency (r = .37) and Access (r = .32); negatively correlated with Distress (r = −.54); and positively correlated with Coping strategies (r = .43), Personal Satisfaction (r = .57), Practice Management (r = .17), Fulfillment (r = .53), Financial (r = .36) and Recognition (r = .54). Physicians’ perceptions on Quality, Efficiency, Access, Distress, Coping, Personal Satisfaction, Practice Management, Fulfillment, Pay and Recognition explained 60.2% of the variation in Satisfaction with Competence, controlling for years in practice, self-reported health and duties of physicians. CONCLUSION: Satisfaction with Competence could be affected by excessive accumulation of duties, concerns about quality, efficiency, access, excessive distress, inadequate coping abilities, personal satisfaction with life as a physician, challenges in managing practices and persistent inequities among physicians. SAGE Publications 2015-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4821212/ /pubmed/27092256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312115613352 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Lepnurm, Rein
Dobson, Roy Thomas
Peña-Sánchez, Juan-Nicolás
Nesdole, Robert
Modeling factors explaining physicians’ satisfaction with competence
title Modeling factors explaining physicians’ satisfaction with competence
title_full Modeling factors explaining physicians’ satisfaction with competence
title_fullStr Modeling factors explaining physicians’ satisfaction with competence
title_full_unstemmed Modeling factors explaining physicians’ satisfaction with competence
title_short Modeling factors explaining physicians’ satisfaction with competence
title_sort modeling factors explaining physicians’ satisfaction with competence
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4821212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27092256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312115613352
work_keys_str_mv AT lepnurmrein modelingfactorsexplainingphysicianssatisfactionwithcompetence
AT dobsonroythomas modelingfactorsexplainingphysicianssatisfactionwithcompetence
AT penasanchezjuannicolas modelingfactorsexplainingphysicianssatisfactionwithcompetence
AT nesdolerobert modelingfactorsexplainingphysicianssatisfactionwithcompetence