Cargando…

Evaluating the transition from dexmedetomidine to clonidine for agitation management in the intensive care unit

OBJECTIVES: Limited literature exists examining the use of enteral clonidine to transition patients from dexmedetomidine for management of agitation. The aim of this study was to evaluate dexmedetomidine discontinuation within 8 h of enteral clonidine administration in addition to the rates of dexme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Terry, Kimberly, Blum, Rachel, Szumita, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4821213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27092265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312115621767
_version_ 1782425542924959744
author Terry, Kimberly
Blum, Rachel
Szumita, Paul
author_facet Terry, Kimberly
Blum, Rachel
Szumita, Paul
author_sort Terry, Kimberly
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Limited literature exists examining the use of enteral clonidine to transition patients from dexmedetomidine for management of agitation. The aim of this study was to evaluate dexmedetomidine discontinuation within 8 h of enteral clonidine administration in addition to the rates of dexmedetomidine re-initiation in patients who failed clonidine transition. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective analysis evaluated critically ill adult patients from 1 February 2013 to 28 February 2014, who used dexmedetomidine and clonidine for sedation management. Patients were excluded if they received enteral clonidine for reasons other than sedation management. Secondary aims of the study observed time to dexmedetomidine discontinuation, agitation (Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale) and delirium ratings (Confusion Assessment Method for the intensive care unit), clonidine dose, and enteral clonidine discontinuation. RESULTS: In all, 26 patients were evaluated. Demographics included a mean age of 54.4 (±16.7) years, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score of 18 (interquartile range = 14–22), and 80.7% of admissions to the cardiac surgery intensive care unit. Dexmedetomidine discontinuation occurred in 17 (65.4%) patients within 8 h of receiving clonidine. The total median clonidine exposure per intensive care unit day was 0.35 mg/ICU day (interquartile range = 0.2–0.5) in patients who discontinued dexmedetomidine within 8 h and 0.5 mg/ICU day (interquartile range = 0.4–1.0) (p = 0.036) in patients who did not. We observed similar Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale and Confusion Assessment Method for the intensive care unit scores and rates of hypotension. Unintentional use of clonidine beyond ICU and hospital stay was observed in 54% and 23% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Enteral clonidine may be an effective and safe alternative to transition patients off of dexmedetomidine for ongoing sedation management. Clinicians should critically evaluate the need for clonidine at ICU and hospital discharge. More studies comparing the use of clonidine to transition from dexmedetomidine infusions are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4821213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48212132016-04-18 Evaluating the transition from dexmedetomidine to clonidine for agitation management in the intensive care unit Terry, Kimberly Blum, Rachel Szumita, Paul SAGE Open Med Original Article OBJECTIVES: Limited literature exists examining the use of enteral clonidine to transition patients from dexmedetomidine for management of agitation. The aim of this study was to evaluate dexmedetomidine discontinuation within 8 h of enteral clonidine administration in addition to the rates of dexmedetomidine re-initiation in patients who failed clonidine transition. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective analysis evaluated critically ill adult patients from 1 February 2013 to 28 February 2014, who used dexmedetomidine and clonidine for sedation management. Patients were excluded if they received enteral clonidine for reasons other than sedation management. Secondary aims of the study observed time to dexmedetomidine discontinuation, agitation (Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale) and delirium ratings (Confusion Assessment Method for the intensive care unit), clonidine dose, and enteral clonidine discontinuation. RESULTS: In all, 26 patients were evaluated. Demographics included a mean age of 54.4 (±16.7) years, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score of 18 (interquartile range = 14–22), and 80.7% of admissions to the cardiac surgery intensive care unit. Dexmedetomidine discontinuation occurred in 17 (65.4%) patients within 8 h of receiving clonidine. The total median clonidine exposure per intensive care unit day was 0.35 mg/ICU day (interquartile range = 0.2–0.5) in patients who discontinued dexmedetomidine within 8 h and 0.5 mg/ICU day (interquartile range = 0.4–1.0) (p = 0.036) in patients who did not. We observed similar Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale and Confusion Assessment Method for the intensive care unit scores and rates of hypotension. Unintentional use of clonidine beyond ICU and hospital stay was observed in 54% and 23% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Enteral clonidine may be an effective and safe alternative to transition patients off of dexmedetomidine for ongoing sedation management. Clinicians should critically evaluate the need for clonidine at ICU and hospital discharge. More studies comparing the use of clonidine to transition from dexmedetomidine infusions are needed. SAGE Publications 2015-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4821213/ /pubmed/27092265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312115621767 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Terry, Kimberly
Blum, Rachel
Szumita, Paul
Evaluating the transition from dexmedetomidine to clonidine for agitation management in the intensive care unit
title Evaluating the transition from dexmedetomidine to clonidine for agitation management in the intensive care unit
title_full Evaluating the transition from dexmedetomidine to clonidine for agitation management in the intensive care unit
title_fullStr Evaluating the transition from dexmedetomidine to clonidine for agitation management in the intensive care unit
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the transition from dexmedetomidine to clonidine for agitation management in the intensive care unit
title_short Evaluating the transition from dexmedetomidine to clonidine for agitation management in the intensive care unit
title_sort evaluating the transition from dexmedetomidine to clonidine for agitation management in the intensive care unit
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4821213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27092265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312115621767
work_keys_str_mv AT terrykimberly evaluatingthetransitionfromdexmedetomidinetoclonidineforagitationmanagementintheintensivecareunit
AT blumrachel evaluatingthetransitionfromdexmedetomidinetoclonidineforagitationmanagementintheintensivecareunit
AT szumitapaul evaluatingthetransitionfromdexmedetomidinetoclonidineforagitationmanagementintheintensivecareunit