Cargando…

Bone Transport for Limb Reconstruction Following Severe Tibial Fractures

A common treatment of tibial defects especially after infections is bone transport via external fixation. We compare complications and outcomes of 25 patients treated with a typical Ilizarov frame or a hybrid system for bone reconstruction of the tibia. Average follow up was 5.1 years. Particular in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fürmetz, Julian, Soo, Chris, Behrendt, Wolf, Thaller, Peter H., Siekmann, Holger, Böhme, Jörg, Josten, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4821232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27114814
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2016.6384
_version_ 1782425547141283840
author Fürmetz, Julian
Soo, Chris
Behrendt, Wolf
Thaller, Peter H.
Siekmann, Holger
Böhme, Jörg
Josten, Christoph
author_facet Fürmetz, Julian
Soo, Chris
Behrendt, Wolf
Thaller, Peter H.
Siekmann, Holger
Böhme, Jörg
Josten, Christoph
author_sort Fürmetz, Julian
collection PubMed
description A common treatment of tibial defects especially after infections is bone transport via external fixation. We compare complications and outcomes of 25 patients treated with a typical Ilizarov frame or a hybrid system for bone reconstruction of the tibia. Average follow up was 5.1 years. Particular interest was paid to the following criteria: injury type, comorbidities, development of osteitis and outcome of the different therapies. The reason for segmental resection was a second or third grade open tibia fractures in 24 cases and in one case an infection after plate osteosynthesis. Average age of the patients was 41 years (range 19 to 65 years) and average defect size 6.6 cm (range 3.0 to 13.4 cm). After a mean time of 113 days 23 tibial defects were reconstructed, so we calculated an average healing index of 44.2 days/cm. Two patients with major comorbidities needed a below knee amputation. The presence of osteitis led to a more complicated course of therapy. In the follow up patients with an Ilizarov frame had better results than patients with hybrid systems. Bone transport using external fixation is suitable for larger defect reconstruction. With significant comorbidities, however, a primary amputation or other methods must be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4821232
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48212322016-04-25 Bone Transport for Limb Reconstruction Following Severe Tibial Fractures Fürmetz, Julian Soo, Chris Behrendt, Wolf Thaller, Peter H. Siekmann, Holger Böhme, Jörg Josten, Christoph Orthop Rev (Pavia) Article A common treatment of tibial defects especially after infections is bone transport via external fixation. We compare complications and outcomes of 25 patients treated with a typical Ilizarov frame or a hybrid system for bone reconstruction of the tibia. Average follow up was 5.1 years. Particular interest was paid to the following criteria: injury type, comorbidities, development of osteitis and outcome of the different therapies. The reason for segmental resection was a second or third grade open tibia fractures in 24 cases and in one case an infection after plate osteosynthesis. Average age of the patients was 41 years (range 19 to 65 years) and average defect size 6.6 cm (range 3.0 to 13.4 cm). After a mean time of 113 days 23 tibial defects were reconstructed, so we calculated an average healing index of 44.2 days/cm. Two patients with major comorbidities needed a below knee amputation. The presence of osteitis led to a more complicated course of therapy. In the follow up patients with an Ilizarov frame had better results than patients with hybrid systems. Bone transport using external fixation is suitable for larger defect reconstruction. With significant comorbidities, however, a primary amputation or other methods must be considered. PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2016-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4821232/ /pubmed/27114814 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2016.6384 Text en ©Copyright J. Fürmetz et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Fürmetz, Julian
Soo, Chris
Behrendt, Wolf
Thaller, Peter H.
Siekmann, Holger
Böhme, Jörg
Josten, Christoph
Bone Transport for Limb Reconstruction Following Severe Tibial Fractures
title Bone Transport for Limb Reconstruction Following Severe Tibial Fractures
title_full Bone Transport for Limb Reconstruction Following Severe Tibial Fractures
title_fullStr Bone Transport for Limb Reconstruction Following Severe Tibial Fractures
title_full_unstemmed Bone Transport for Limb Reconstruction Following Severe Tibial Fractures
title_short Bone Transport for Limb Reconstruction Following Severe Tibial Fractures
title_sort bone transport for limb reconstruction following severe tibial fractures
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4821232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27114814
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2016.6384
work_keys_str_mv AT furmetzjulian bonetransportforlimbreconstructionfollowingseveretibialfractures
AT soochris bonetransportforlimbreconstructionfollowingseveretibialfractures
AT behrendtwolf bonetransportforlimbreconstructionfollowingseveretibialfractures
AT thallerpeterh bonetransportforlimbreconstructionfollowingseveretibialfractures
AT siekmannholger bonetransportforlimbreconstructionfollowingseveretibialfractures
AT bohmejorg bonetransportforlimbreconstructionfollowingseveretibialfractures
AT jostenchristoph bonetransportforlimbreconstructionfollowingseveretibialfractures