Cargando…

DNA barcoding to identify leaf preference of leafcutting bees

Leafcutting bees (Megachile: Megachilidae) cut leaves from various trees, shrubs, wildflowers and grasses to partition and encase brood cells in hollow plant stems, decaying logs or in the ground. The identification of preferred plant species via morphological characters of the leaf fragments is cha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: MacIvor, J. Scott
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4821261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27069650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150623
_version_ 1782425554015748096
author MacIvor, J. Scott
author_facet MacIvor, J. Scott
author_sort MacIvor, J. Scott
collection PubMed
description Leafcutting bees (Megachile: Megachilidae) cut leaves from various trees, shrubs, wildflowers and grasses to partition and encase brood cells in hollow plant stems, decaying logs or in the ground. The identification of preferred plant species via morphological characters of the leaf fragments is challenging and direct observation of bees cutting leaves from certain plant species are difficult. As such, data are poor on leaf preference of leafcutting bees. In this study, I use DNA barcoding of the rcbL and ITS2 regions to identify and compare leaf preference of three Megachile bee species widespread in Toronto, Canada. Nests were opened and one leaf piece from one cell per nest of the native M. pugnata Say (N=45 leaf pieces), and the introduced M. rotundata Fabricius (N=64) and M. centuncularis (L.) (N=65) were analysed. From 174 individual DNA sequences, 54 plant species were identified. Preference by M. rotundata was most diverse (36 leaf species, H′=3.08, phylogenetic diversity (pd)=2.97), followed by M. centuncularis (23 species, H′=2.38, pd=1.51) then M. pugnata (18 species, H′=1.87, pd=1.22). Cluster analysis revealed significant overlap in leaf choice of M. rotundata and M. centuncularis. There was no significant preference for native leaves, and only M. centuncularis showed preference for leaves of woody plants over perennials. Interestingly, antimicrobial properties were present in all but six plants collected; all these were exotic plants and none were collected by the native bee, M. pugnata. These missing details in interpreting what bees need offers valuable information for conservation by accounting for necessary (and potentially limiting) nesting materials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4821261
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Royal Society Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48212612016-04-11 DNA barcoding to identify leaf preference of leafcutting bees MacIvor, J. Scott R Soc Open Sci Biology (Whole organism) Leafcutting bees (Megachile: Megachilidae) cut leaves from various trees, shrubs, wildflowers and grasses to partition and encase brood cells in hollow plant stems, decaying logs or in the ground. The identification of preferred plant species via morphological characters of the leaf fragments is challenging and direct observation of bees cutting leaves from certain plant species are difficult. As such, data are poor on leaf preference of leafcutting bees. In this study, I use DNA barcoding of the rcbL and ITS2 regions to identify and compare leaf preference of three Megachile bee species widespread in Toronto, Canada. Nests were opened and one leaf piece from one cell per nest of the native M. pugnata Say (N=45 leaf pieces), and the introduced M. rotundata Fabricius (N=64) and M. centuncularis (L.) (N=65) were analysed. From 174 individual DNA sequences, 54 plant species were identified. Preference by M. rotundata was most diverse (36 leaf species, H′=3.08, phylogenetic diversity (pd)=2.97), followed by M. centuncularis (23 species, H′=2.38, pd=1.51) then M. pugnata (18 species, H′=1.87, pd=1.22). Cluster analysis revealed significant overlap in leaf choice of M. rotundata and M. centuncularis. There was no significant preference for native leaves, and only M. centuncularis showed preference for leaves of woody plants over perennials. Interestingly, antimicrobial properties were present in all but six plants collected; all these were exotic plants and none were collected by the native bee, M. pugnata. These missing details in interpreting what bees need offers valuable information for conservation by accounting for necessary (and potentially limiting) nesting materials. The Royal Society Publishing 2016-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4821261/ /pubmed/27069650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150623 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ © 2016 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Biology (Whole organism)
MacIvor, J. Scott
DNA barcoding to identify leaf preference of leafcutting bees
title DNA barcoding to identify leaf preference of leafcutting bees
title_full DNA barcoding to identify leaf preference of leafcutting bees
title_fullStr DNA barcoding to identify leaf preference of leafcutting bees
title_full_unstemmed DNA barcoding to identify leaf preference of leafcutting bees
title_short DNA barcoding to identify leaf preference of leafcutting bees
title_sort dna barcoding to identify leaf preference of leafcutting bees
topic Biology (Whole organism)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4821261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27069650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150623
work_keys_str_mv AT macivorjscott dnabarcodingtoidentifyleafpreferenceofleafcuttingbees