Cargando…
Restricted grouper reproductive migrations support community-based management
Conservation commonly requires trade-offs between social and ecological goals. For tropical small-scale fisheries, spatial scales of socially appropriate management are generally small—the median no-take locally managed marine area (LMMA) area throughout the Pacific is less than 1 km(2). This is of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4821273/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27069662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150694 |
_version_ | 1782425556885700608 |
---|---|
author | Waldie, Peter A. Almany, Glenn R. Sinclair-Taylor, Tane H. Hamilton, Richard J. Potuku, Tapas Priest, Mark A. Rhodes, Kevin L. Robinson, Jan Cinner, Joshua E. Berumen, Michael L. |
author_facet | Waldie, Peter A. Almany, Glenn R. Sinclair-Taylor, Tane H. Hamilton, Richard J. Potuku, Tapas Priest, Mark A. Rhodes, Kevin L. Robinson, Jan Cinner, Joshua E. Berumen, Michael L. |
author_sort | Waldie, Peter A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Conservation commonly requires trade-offs between social and ecological goals. For tropical small-scale fisheries, spatial scales of socially appropriate management are generally small—the median no-take locally managed marine area (LMMA) area throughout the Pacific is less than 1 km(2). This is of particular concern for large coral reef fishes, such as many species of grouper, which migrate to aggregations to spawn. Current data suggest that the catchment areas (i.e. total area from which individuals are drawn) of such aggregations are at spatial scales that preclude effective community-based management with no-take LMMAs. We used acoustic telemetry and tag-returns to examine reproductive migrations and catchment areas of the grouper Epinephelus fuscoguttatus at a spawning aggregation in Papua New Guinea. Protection of the resultant catchment area of approximately 16 km(2) using a no-take LMMA is socially untenable here and throughout much of the Pacific region. However, we found that spawning migrations were skewed towards shorter distances. Consequently, expanding the current 0.2 km(2) no-take LMMA to 1–2 km(2) would protect approximately 30–50% of the spawning population throughout the non-spawning season. Contrasting with current knowledge, our results demonstrate that species with moderate reproductive migrations can be managed at scales congruous with spatially restricted management tools. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4821273 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | The Royal Society Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48212732016-04-11 Restricted grouper reproductive migrations support community-based management Waldie, Peter A. Almany, Glenn R. Sinclair-Taylor, Tane H. Hamilton, Richard J. Potuku, Tapas Priest, Mark A. Rhodes, Kevin L. Robinson, Jan Cinner, Joshua E. Berumen, Michael L. R Soc Open Sci Research Article Conservation commonly requires trade-offs between social and ecological goals. For tropical small-scale fisheries, spatial scales of socially appropriate management are generally small—the median no-take locally managed marine area (LMMA) area throughout the Pacific is less than 1 km(2). This is of particular concern for large coral reef fishes, such as many species of grouper, which migrate to aggregations to spawn. Current data suggest that the catchment areas (i.e. total area from which individuals are drawn) of such aggregations are at spatial scales that preclude effective community-based management with no-take LMMAs. We used acoustic telemetry and tag-returns to examine reproductive migrations and catchment areas of the grouper Epinephelus fuscoguttatus at a spawning aggregation in Papua New Guinea. Protection of the resultant catchment area of approximately 16 km(2) using a no-take LMMA is socially untenable here and throughout much of the Pacific region. However, we found that spawning migrations were skewed towards shorter distances. Consequently, expanding the current 0.2 km(2) no-take LMMA to 1–2 km(2) would protect approximately 30–50% of the spawning population throughout the non-spawning season. Contrasting with current knowledge, our results demonstrate that species with moderate reproductive migrations can be managed at scales congruous with spatially restricted management tools. The Royal Society Publishing 2016-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4821273/ /pubmed/27069662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150694 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ © 2016 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Waldie, Peter A. Almany, Glenn R. Sinclair-Taylor, Tane H. Hamilton, Richard J. Potuku, Tapas Priest, Mark A. Rhodes, Kevin L. Robinson, Jan Cinner, Joshua E. Berumen, Michael L. Restricted grouper reproductive migrations support community-based management |
title | Restricted grouper reproductive migrations support community-based management |
title_full | Restricted grouper reproductive migrations support community-based management |
title_fullStr | Restricted grouper reproductive migrations support community-based management |
title_full_unstemmed | Restricted grouper reproductive migrations support community-based management |
title_short | Restricted grouper reproductive migrations support community-based management |
title_sort | restricted grouper reproductive migrations support community-based management |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4821273/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27069662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150694 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT waldiepetera restrictedgrouperreproductivemigrationssupportcommunitybasedmanagement AT almanyglennr restrictedgrouperreproductivemigrationssupportcommunitybasedmanagement AT sinclairtaylortaneh restrictedgrouperreproductivemigrationssupportcommunitybasedmanagement AT hamiltonrichardj restrictedgrouperreproductivemigrationssupportcommunitybasedmanagement AT potukutapas restrictedgrouperreproductivemigrationssupportcommunitybasedmanagement AT priestmarka restrictedgrouperreproductivemigrationssupportcommunitybasedmanagement AT rhodeskevinl restrictedgrouperreproductivemigrationssupportcommunitybasedmanagement AT robinsonjan restrictedgrouperreproductivemigrationssupportcommunitybasedmanagement AT cinnerjoshuae restrictedgrouperreproductivemigrationssupportcommunitybasedmanagement AT berumenmichaell restrictedgrouperreproductivemigrationssupportcommunitybasedmanagement |