Cargando…

Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews of Non-Randomized Studies of Adverse Cardiovascular Effects of Thiazolidinediones and Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors: Application of a New Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool

BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews of the effects of healthcare interventions frequently include non-randomized studies. These are subject to confounding and a range of other biases that are seldom considered in detail when synthesizing and interpreting the results. Our aims were to assess the reliabili...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Bilandzic, Anja, Fitzpatrick, Tiffany, Rosella, Laura, Henry, David
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4821619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27046153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001987

Ejemplares similares

The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
por: Higgins, Julian P T, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Most Cochrane systematic reviews and protocols did not adhere to the Cochrane's risk of bias 2.0 tool
por: Martimbianco, Ana Luiza Cabrera, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Evaluation of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials: overview of published comments and analysis of user practice in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews
por: Jørgensen, Lars, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies
por: Lundh, Andreas, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Considerations from the risk of bias perspective for updating Cochrane reviews
por: Mayhew, Alain D., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook
por: Barcot, Ognjen, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Effect of standardized training on the reliability of the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool: a study protocol
por: da Costa, Bruno R, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Effect of standardized training on the reliability of the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool: a prospective study
por: da Costa, Bruno R., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Poor Reliability between Cochrane Reviewers and Blinded External Reviewers When Applying the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool in Physical Therapy Trials
por: Armijo-Olivo, Susan, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Cochrane's risk of bias tool for non-randomized studies (ROBINS-I) is frequently misapplied: A methodological systematic review
por: Igelström, Erik, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation
por: Savović, Jelena, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The effect of the CONSORT statement on the amount of “unclear” Risk of Bias reporting in Cochrane Systematic Reviews
por: Rademaker, Maaike M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
por: Turner, Lucy, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Thiazolidinediones and Cardiovascular Risk — A Question of Balance
por: Erdmann, Erland, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Risk of bias judgements and strength of conclusions in meta-evidence from the Cochrane Colorectal Cancer Group
por: Delaney, John, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Association Between Risk-of-Bias Assessments and Results of Randomized Trials in Cochrane Reviews: The ROBES Meta-Epidemiologic Study
por: Savović, Jelena, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Risk of Cardiovascular Events and Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors
por: Tabrizchi, Reza
Publicado: (2006)

The judgement of biases included in the category “other bias” in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic survey
por: Babic, Andrija, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A new large-scale meta-epidemiological study on bias in randomized trials using routinely collected risk-of-bias assessments by cochrane reviewers: results from the robes study
por: Savovic, Jelena, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Adequacy of risk of bias assessment in surgical vs non-surgical trials in Cochrane reviews: a methodological study
por: Barcot, Ognjen, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies
por: Hooijmans, Carlijn R, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Managing the incidence of selective reporting bias: a survey of Cochrane review groups
por: Reid, Emma K, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Outcome reporting bias in Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis
por: Shah, Kieran, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Agreement between the Cochrane risk of bias tool and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale: A meta-epidemiological study of randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions
por: Moseley, Anne M., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The relationship between risk of bias criteria, research outcomes, and study sponsorship in a cohort of preclinical thiazolidinedione animal studies: a meta‐analysis
por: Abdel‐Sattar, M., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Methodological Bias Can Lead the Cochrane Collaboration to Irrelevance in Public Health Decision-Making
por: Montresor, Antonio, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Assessing the risk of performance and detection bias in Cochrane reviews as a joint domain is less accurate compared to two separate domains
por: Barcot, Ognjen, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Risk of Fracture with Thiazolidinediones: Disease or Drugs?
por: Bazelier, Marloes T., et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Assessing bias in osteoarthritis trials included in Cochrane reviews: protocol for a meta-epidemiological study
por: Hansen, Julie B, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Assessments of attrition bias in Cochrane systematic reviews are highly inconsistent and thus hindering trial comparability
por: Babic, Andrija, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Tools for assessing quality and risk of bias in Mendelian randomization studies: a systematic review
por: Spiga, Francesca, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Erasing Institutional Bias
por: Jana, Tiffany
Publicado: (2018)

Thiazolidinediones are associated with a reduced risk of COPD exacerbations
por: Rinne, Seppo T, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Risk of selection bias in randomized trials: further insight
por: Berger, Vance W.
Publicado: (2016)

Risk of Bias Tool in Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses of Acupuncture in Chinese Journals
por: Liu, Yali, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
por: Whiting, Penny, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

ROBITT: A tool for assessing the risk‐of‐bias in studies of temporal trends in ecology
por: Boyd, Robin J., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Risk of bias in non-randomized observational studies assessing the relationship between proton-pump inhibitors and adverse kidney outcomes: a systematic review
por: Rajan, Pradeep, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
por: Sterne, Jonathan AC, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Assessment of risk of bias in translational science
por: Barkhordarian, Andre, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_5the5986isjmtjcc69j8ddbonq