Cargando…

Inference for correlated effect sizes using multiple univariate meta‐analyses

Multivariate meta‐analysis, which involves jointly analyzing multiple and correlated outcomes from separate studies, has received a great deal of attention. One reason to prefer the multivariate approach is its ability to account for the dependence between multiple estimates from the same study. How...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Yong, Cai, Yi, Hong, Chuan, Jackson, Dan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4821787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26537017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.6789
_version_ 1782425635579232256
author Chen, Yong
Cai, Yi
Hong, Chuan
Jackson, Dan
author_facet Chen, Yong
Cai, Yi
Hong, Chuan
Jackson, Dan
author_sort Chen, Yong
collection PubMed
description Multivariate meta‐analysis, which involves jointly analyzing multiple and correlated outcomes from separate studies, has received a great deal of attention. One reason to prefer the multivariate approach is its ability to account for the dependence between multiple estimates from the same study. However, nearly all the existing methods for analyzing multivariate meta‐analytic data require the knowledge of the within‐study correlations, which are usually unavailable in practice. We propose a simple non‐iterative method that can be used for the analysis of multivariate meta‐analysis datasets, that has no convergence problems, and does not require the use of within‐study correlations. Our approach uses standard univariate methods for the marginal effects but also provides valid joint inference for multiple parameters. The proposed method can directly handle missing outcomes under missing completely at random assumption. Simulation studies show that the proposed method provides unbiased estimates, well‐estimated standard errors, and confidence intervals with good coverage probability. Furthermore, the proposed method is found to maintain high relative efficiency compared with conventional multivariate meta‐analyses where the within‐study correlations are known. We illustrate the proposed method through two real meta‐analyses where functions of the estimated effects are of interest. © 2015 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4821787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48217872016-04-30 Inference for correlated effect sizes using multiple univariate meta‐analyses Chen, Yong Cai, Yi Hong, Chuan Jackson, Dan Stat Med Research Articles Multivariate meta‐analysis, which involves jointly analyzing multiple and correlated outcomes from separate studies, has received a great deal of attention. One reason to prefer the multivariate approach is its ability to account for the dependence between multiple estimates from the same study. However, nearly all the existing methods for analyzing multivariate meta‐analytic data require the knowledge of the within‐study correlations, which are usually unavailable in practice. We propose a simple non‐iterative method that can be used for the analysis of multivariate meta‐analysis datasets, that has no convergence problems, and does not require the use of within‐study correlations. Our approach uses standard univariate methods for the marginal effects but also provides valid joint inference for multiple parameters. The proposed method can directly handle missing outcomes under missing completely at random assumption. Simulation studies show that the proposed method provides unbiased estimates, well‐estimated standard errors, and confidence intervals with good coverage probability. Furthermore, the proposed method is found to maintain high relative efficiency compared with conventional multivariate meta‐analyses where the within‐study correlations are known. We illustrate the proposed method through two real meta‐analyses where functions of the estimated effects are of interest. © 2015 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-11-04 2016-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4821787/ /pubmed/26537017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.6789 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Chen, Yong
Cai, Yi
Hong, Chuan
Jackson, Dan
Inference for correlated effect sizes using multiple univariate meta‐analyses
title Inference for correlated effect sizes using multiple univariate meta‐analyses
title_full Inference for correlated effect sizes using multiple univariate meta‐analyses
title_fullStr Inference for correlated effect sizes using multiple univariate meta‐analyses
title_full_unstemmed Inference for correlated effect sizes using multiple univariate meta‐analyses
title_short Inference for correlated effect sizes using multiple univariate meta‐analyses
title_sort inference for correlated effect sizes using multiple univariate meta‐analyses
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4821787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26537017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.6789
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyong inferenceforcorrelatedeffectsizesusingmultipleunivariatemetaanalyses
AT caiyi inferenceforcorrelatedeffectsizesusingmultipleunivariatemetaanalyses
AT hongchuan inferenceforcorrelatedeffectsizesusingmultipleunivariatemetaanalyses
AT jacksondan inferenceforcorrelatedeffectsizesusingmultipleunivariatemetaanalyses