Cargando…

Bias in the reporting of sex and age in biomedical research on mouse models

In animal-based biomedical research, both the sex and the age of the animals studied affect disease phenotypes by modifying their susceptibility, presentation and response to treatment. The accurate reporting of experimental methods and materials, including the sex and age of animals, is essential s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flórez-Vargas, Oscar, Brass, Andy, Karystianis, George, Bramhall, Michael, Stevens, Robert, Cruickshank, Sheena, Nenadic, Goran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4821800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26939790
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13615
_version_ 1782425638082183168
author Flórez-Vargas, Oscar
Brass, Andy
Karystianis, George
Bramhall, Michael
Stevens, Robert
Cruickshank, Sheena
Nenadic, Goran
author_facet Flórez-Vargas, Oscar
Brass, Andy
Karystianis, George
Bramhall, Michael
Stevens, Robert
Cruickshank, Sheena
Nenadic, Goran
author_sort Flórez-Vargas, Oscar
collection PubMed
description In animal-based biomedical research, both the sex and the age of the animals studied affect disease phenotypes by modifying their susceptibility, presentation and response to treatment. The accurate reporting of experimental methods and materials, including the sex and age of animals, is essential so that other researchers can build on the results of such studies. Here we use text mining to study 15,311 research papers in which mice were the focus of the study. We find that the percentage of papers reporting the sex and age of mice has increased over the past two decades: however, only about 50% of the papers published in 2014 reported these two variables. We also compared the quality of reporting in six preclinical research areas and found evidence for different levels of sex-bias in these areas: the strongest male-bias was observed in cardiovascular disease models and the strongest female-bias was found in infectious disease models. These results demonstrate the ability of text mining to contribute to the ongoing debate about the reproducibility of research, and confirm the need to continue efforts to improve the reporting of experimental methods and materials. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13615.001
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4821800
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48218002016-04-07 Bias in the reporting of sex and age in biomedical research on mouse models Flórez-Vargas, Oscar Brass, Andy Karystianis, George Bramhall, Michael Stevens, Robert Cruickshank, Sheena Nenadic, Goran eLife Computational and Systems Biology In animal-based biomedical research, both the sex and the age of the animals studied affect disease phenotypes by modifying their susceptibility, presentation and response to treatment. The accurate reporting of experimental methods and materials, including the sex and age of animals, is essential so that other researchers can build on the results of such studies. Here we use text mining to study 15,311 research papers in which mice were the focus of the study. We find that the percentage of papers reporting the sex and age of mice has increased over the past two decades: however, only about 50% of the papers published in 2014 reported these two variables. We also compared the quality of reporting in six preclinical research areas and found evidence for different levels of sex-bias in these areas: the strongest male-bias was observed in cardiovascular disease models and the strongest female-bias was found in infectious disease models. These results demonstrate the ability of text mining to contribute to the ongoing debate about the reproducibility of research, and confirm the need to continue efforts to improve the reporting of experimental methods and materials. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13615.001 eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2016-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4821800/ /pubmed/26939790 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13615 Text en © 2016, Flórez-Vargas et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Computational and Systems Biology
Flórez-Vargas, Oscar
Brass, Andy
Karystianis, George
Bramhall, Michael
Stevens, Robert
Cruickshank, Sheena
Nenadic, Goran
Bias in the reporting of sex and age in biomedical research on mouse models
title Bias in the reporting of sex and age in biomedical research on mouse models
title_full Bias in the reporting of sex and age in biomedical research on mouse models
title_fullStr Bias in the reporting of sex and age in biomedical research on mouse models
title_full_unstemmed Bias in the reporting of sex and age in biomedical research on mouse models
title_short Bias in the reporting of sex and age in biomedical research on mouse models
title_sort bias in the reporting of sex and age in biomedical research on mouse models
topic Computational and Systems Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4821800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26939790
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13615
work_keys_str_mv AT florezvargasoscar biasinthereportingofsexandageinbiomedicalresearchonmousemodels
AT brassandy biasinthereportingofsexandageinbiomedicalresearchonmousemodels
AT karystianisgeorge biasinthereportingofsexandageinbiomedicalresearchonmousemodels
AT bramhallmichael biasinthereportingofsexandageinbiomedicalresearchonmousemodels
AT stevensrobert biasinthereportingofsexandageinbiomedicalresearchonmousemodels
AT cruickshanksheena biasinthereportingofsexandageinbiomedicalresearchonmousemodels
AT nenadicgoran biasinthereportingofsexandageinbiomedicalresearchonmousemodels