Cargando…

The Role of Personalised Choice in Decision Support: A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Online Decision Aid for Prostate Cancer Screening

IMPORTANCE: Decision support tools can assist people to apply population-based evidence on benefits and harms to individual health decisions. A key question is whether “personalising” choice within decisions aids leads to better decision quality. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of personalising the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salkeld, Glenn, Cunich, Michelle, Dowie, Jack, Howard, Kirsten, Patel, Manish I., Mann, Graham, Lipworth, Wendy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4822955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27050101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152999
_version_ 1782425834134437888
author Salkeld, Glenn
Cunich, Michelle
Dowie, Jack
Howard, Kirsten
Patel, Manish I.
Mann, Graham
Lipworth, Wendy
author_facet Salkeld, Glenn
Cunich, Michelle
Dowie, Jack
Howard, Kirsten
Patel, Manish I.
Mann, Graham
Lipworth, Wendy
author_sort Salkeld, Glenn
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Decision support tools can assist people to apply population-based evidence on benefits and harms to individual health decisions. A key question is whether “personalising” choice within decisions aids leads to better decision quality. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of personalising the content of a decision aid for prostate cancer screening using the Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) test. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 1,970 men aged 40–69 years were approached to participate in the trial. INTERVENTION: 1,447 men were randomly allocated to either a standard decision aid with a fixed set of five attributes or a personalised decision aid with choice over the inclusion of up to 10 attributes. OUTCOME MEASURES: To determine whether there was a difference between the two groups in terms of: 1) the emergent opinion (generated by the decision aid) to have a PSA test or not; 2) self-rated decision quality after completing the online decision aid; 3) their intention to undergo screening in the next 12 months. We also wanted to determine whether men in the personalised choice group made use of the extra decision attributes. RESULTS: 5% of men in the fixed attribute group scored ‘Have a PSA test’ as the opinion generated by the aid, as compared to 62% of men in the personalised choice group (χ(2) = 569.38, 2df, p< 0001). Those men who used the personalised decision aid had slightly higher decision quality (t = 2.157, df = 1444, p = 0.031). The men in the personalised choice group made extensive use of the additional decision attributes. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of their stated intention to undergo screening in the next 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Together, these findings suggest that personalised decision support systems could be an important development in shared decision-making and patient-centered care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12612000723886
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4822955
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48229552016-04-22 The Role of Personalised Choice in Decision Support: A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Online Decision Aid for Prostate Cancer Screening Salkeld, Glenn Cunich, Michelle Dowie, Jack Howard, Kirsten Patel, Manish I. Mann, Graham Lipworth, Wendy PLoS One Research Article IMPORTANCE: Decision support tools can assist people to apply population-based evidence on benefits and harms to individual health decisions. A key question is whether “personalising” choice within decisions aids leads to better decision quality. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of personalising the content of a decision aid for prostate cancer screening using the Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) test. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 1,970 men aged 40–69 years were approached to participate in the trial. INTERVENTION: 1,447 men were randomly allocated to either a standard decision aid with a fixed set of five attributes or a personalised decision aid with choice over the inclusion of up to 10 attributes. OUTCOME MEASURES: To determine whether there was a difference between the two groups in terms of: 1) the emergent opinion (generated by the decision aid) to have a PSA test or not; 2) self-rated decision quality after completing the online decision aid; 3) their intention to undergo screening in the next 12 months. We also wanted to determine whether men in the personalised choice group made use of the extra decision attributes. RESULTS: 5% of men in the fixed attribute group scored ‘Have a PSA test’ as the opinion generated by the aid, as compared to 62% of men in the personalised choice group (χ(2) = 569.38, 2df, p< 0001). Those men who used the personalised decision aid had slightly higher decision quality (t = 2.157, df = 1444, p = 0.031). The men in the personalised choice group made extensive use of the additional decision attributes. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of their stated intention to undergo screening in the next 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Together, these findings suggest that personalised decision support systems could be an important development in shared decision-making and patient-centered care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12612000723886 Public Library of Science 2016-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4822955/ /pubmed/27050101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152999 Text en © 2016 Salkeld et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Salkeld, Glenn
Cunich, Michelle
Dowie, Jack
Howard, Kirsten
Patel, Manish I.
Mann, Graham
Lipworth, Wendy
The Role of Personalised Choice in Decision Support: A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Online Decision Aid for Prostate Cancer Screening
title The Role of Personalised Choice in Decision Support: A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Online Decision Aid for Prostate Cancer Screening
title_full The Role of Personalised Choice in Decision Support: A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Online Decision Aid for Prostate Cancer Screening
title_fullStr The Role of Personalised Choice in Decision Support: A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Online Decision Aid for Prostate Cancer Screening
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Personalised Choice in Decision Support: A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Online Decision Aid for Prostate Cancer Screening
title_short The Role of Personalised Choice in Decision Support: A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Online Decision Aid for Prostate Cancer Screening
title_sort role of personalised choice in decision support: a randomized controlled trial of an online decision aid for prostate cancer screening
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4822955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27050101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152999
work_keys_str_mv AT salkeldglenn theroleofpersonalisedchoiceindecisionsupportarandomizedcontrolledtrialofanonlinedecisionaidforprostatecancerscreening
AT cunichmichelle theroleofpersonalisedchoiceindecisionsupportarandomizedcontrolledtrialofanonlinedecisionaidforprostatecancerscreening
AT dowiejack theroleofpersonalisedchoiceindecisionsupportarandomizedcontrolledtrialofanonlinedecisionaidforprostatecancerscreening
AT howardkirsten theroleofpersonalisedchoiceindecisionsupportarandomizedcontrolledtrialofanonlinedecisionaidforprostatecancerscreening
AT patelmanishi theroleofpersonalisedchoiceindecisionsupportarandomizedcontrolledtrialofanonlinedecisionaidforprostatecancerscreening
AT manngraham theroleofpersonalisedchoiceindecisionsupportarandomizedcontrolledtrialofanonlinedecisionaidforprostatecancerscreening
AT lipworthwendy theroleofpersonalisedchoiceindecisionsupportarandomizedcontrolledtrialofanonlinedecisionaidforprostatecancerscreening
AT salkeldglenn roleofpersonalisedchoiceindecisionsupportarandomizedcontrolledtrialofanonlinedecisionaidforprostatecancerscreening
AT cunichmichelle roleofpersonalisedchoiceindecisionsupportarandomizedcontrolledtrialofanonlinedecisionaidforprostatecancerscreening
AT dowiejack roleofpersonalisedchoiceindecisionsupportarandomizedcontrolledtrialofanonlinedecisionaidforprostatecancerscreening
AT howardkirsten roleofpersonalisedchoiceindecisionsupportarandomizedcontrolledtrialofanonlinedecisionaidforprostatecancerscreening
AT patelmanishi roleofpersonalisedchoiceindecisionsupportarandomizedcontrolledtrialofanonlinedecisionaidforprostatecancerscreening
AT manngraham roleofpersonalisedchoiceindecisionsupportarandomizedcontrolledtrialofanonlinedecisionaidforprostatecancerscreening
AT lipworthwendy roleofpersonalisedchoiceindecisionsupportarandomizedcontrolledtrialofanonlinedecisionaidforprostatecancerscreening