Cargando…

Nucleus pulposus phenotypic markers to determine stem cell differentiation: fact or fiction?

Progress in mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) based therapies for nucleus pulposus (NP) regeneration are hampered by a lack of understanding and consensus of the normal NP cell phenotype. Despite the recent consensus paper on NP markers, there is still a need to further validate proposed markers. This stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thorpe, Abbey A., Binch, Abbie L.A., Creemers, Laura B., Sammon, Christopher, Le Maitre, Christine L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4823028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26735178
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.6782
_version_ 1782425841385340928
author Thorpe, Abbey A.
Binch, Abbie L.A.
Creemers, Laura B.
Sammon, Christopher
Le Maitre, Christine L.
author_facet Thorpe, Abbey A.
Binch, Abbie L.A.
Creemers, Laura B.
Sammon, Christopher
Le Maitre, Christine L.
author_sort Thorpe, Abbey A.
collection PubMed
description Progress in mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) based therapies for nucleus pulposus (NP) regeneration are hampered by a lack of understanding and consensus of the normal NP cell phenotype. Despite the recent consensus paper on NP markers, there is still a need to further validate proposed markers. This study aimed to determine whether an NP phenotypic profile could be identified within a large population of mature NP samples. qRT-PCR was conducted to assess mRNA expression of 13 genes within human non-degenerate articular chondrocytes (AC) (n=10) and NP cells extracted from patients across a spectrum of histological degeneration grades (n=71). qRT-PCR results were used to select NP marker candidates for protein expression analysis. Differential expression at mRNA between AC and non-degenerate NP cells was only observed for Paired Box Protein 1 (PAX1) and Forkhead box F1 (FOXF1). In contrast no other previously suggested markers displayed differential expression between non-degenerate NP and AC at mRNA level. PAX1 and FOXF1 protein expression was significantly higher in the NP compared to annulus fibrosus (AF), cartilaginous endplate (CEP) and AC. In contrast Laminin-5 (LAM-332), Keratin-19 (KRT-19) and Hypoxia Inducible Factor 1 alpha (HIF1α) showed no differential expression in NP cells compared with AC cells. A marker which exclusively differentiates NP cells from AF and AC cells remains to be identified, raising the question: is the NP a heterogeneous population of cells? Or does the natural biological variation during IVD development, degeneration state and even the life cycle of cells make finding one definitive marker impossible?
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4823028
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48230282016-05-03 Nucleus pulposus phenotypic markers to determine stem cell differentiation: fact or fiction? Thorpe, Abbey A. Binch, Abbie L.A. Creemers, Laura B. Sammon, Christopher Le Maitre, Christine L. Oncotarget Research Paper: Pathology Progress in mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) based therapies for nucleus pulposus (NP) regeneration are hampered by a lack of understanding and consensus of the normal NP cell phenotype. Despite the recent consensus paper on NP markers, there is still a need to further validate proposed markers. This study aimed to determine whether an NP phenotypic profile could be identified within a large population of mature NP samples. qRT-PCR was conducted to assess mRNA expression of 13 genes within human non-degenerate articular chondrocytes (AC) (n=10) and NP cells extracted from patients across a spectrum of histological degeneration grades (n=71). qRT-PCR results were used to select NP marker candidates for protein expression analysis. Differential expression at mRNA between AC and non-degenerate NP cells was only observed for Paired Box Protein 1 (PAX1) and Forkhead box F1 (FOXF1). In contrast no other previously suggested markers displayed differential expression between non-degenerate NP and AC at mRNA level. PAX1 and FOXF1 protein expression was significantly higher in the NP compared to annulus fibrosus (AF), cartilaginous endplate (CEP) and AC. In contrast Laminin-5 (LAM-332), Keratin-19 (KRT-19) and Hypoxia Inducible Factor 1 alpha (HIF1α) showed no differential expression in NP cells compared with AC cells. A marker which exclusively differentiates NP cells from AF and AC cells remains to be identified, raising the question: is the NP a heterogeneous population of cells? Or does the natural biological variation during IVD development, degeneration state and even the life cycle of cells make finding one definitive marker impossible? Impact Journals LLC 2015-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4823028/ /pubmed/26735178 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.6782 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Thorpe et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper: Pathology
Thorpe, Abbey A.
Binch, Abbie L.A.
Creemers, Laura B.
Sammon, Christopher
Le Maitre, Christine L.
Nucleus pulposus phenotypic markers to determine stem cell differentiation: fact or fiction?
title Nucleus pulposus phenotypic markers to determine stem cell differentiation: fact or fiction?
title_full Nucleus pulposus phenotypic markers to determine stem cell differentiation: fact or fiction?
title_fullStr Nucleus pulposus phenotypic markers to determine stem cell differentiation: fact or fiction?
title_full_unstemmed Nucleus pulposus phenotypic markers to determine stem cell differentiation: fact or fiction?
title_short Nucleus pulposus phenotypic markers to determine stem cell differentiation: fact or fiction?
title_sort nucleus pulposus phenotypic markers to determine stem cell differentiation: fact or fiction?
topic Research Paper: Pathology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4823028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26735178
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.6782
work_keys_str_mv AT thorpeabbeya nucleuspulposusphenotypicmarkerstodeterminestemcelldifferentiationfactorfiction
AT binchabbiela nucleuspulposusphenotypicmarkerstodeterminestemcelldifferentiationfactorfiction
AT creemerslaurab nucleuspulposusphenotypicmarkerstodeterminestemcelldifferentiationfactorfiction
AT sammonchristopher nucleuspulposusphenotypicmarkerstodeterminestemcelldifferentiationfactorfiction
AT lemaitrechristinel nucleuspulposusphenotypicmarkerstodeterminestemcelldifferentiationfactorfiction