Cargando…
A multicentre randomised, 1-year comparative effectiveness, parallel-group trial protocol of a physical therapy approach compared to corticosteroid injections
INTRODUCTION: Corticosteroid injections (CSIs) are commonly used as an initial or a primary intervention for knee osteoarthritis (OA). Consistent evidence indicates CSIs offer symptom relief with conflicting reports regarding long-term efficacy. Physical therapy (PT) offers a non-invasive alternativ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4823390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27033961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010528 |
_version_ | 1782425905476403200 |
---|---|
author | Deyle, Gail D Gill, Norman W Rhon, Daniel I Allen, Chris S Allison, Stephen C Hando, Ben R Petersen, Evan J Dusenberry, Douglas I Bellamy, Nicholas |
author_facet | Deyle, Gail D Gill, Norman W Rhon, Daniel I Allen, Chris S Allison, Stephen C Hando, Ben R Petersen, Evan J Dusenberry, Douglas I Bellamy, Nicholas |
author_sort | Deyle, Gail D |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Corticosteroid injections (CSIs) are commonly used as an initial or a primary intervention for knee osteoarthritis (OA). Consistent evidence indicates CSIs offer symptom relief with conflicting reports regarding long-term efficacy. Physical therapy (PT) offers a non-invasive alternative. There is moderate evidence suggesting short-term and long-term symptom relief and functional improvement with PT interventions. Patients with knee OA are more commonly prescribed CSI than PT prior to total joint replacement. UnitedHealthcare and Military Health System data show substantially more total knee replacement patients receive preoperative CSI than PT. There are no studies comparing CSI to a PT approach in individuals with knee OA. The primary objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of CSI to PT in individuals with knee OA at 1, 2 and 12 months. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We plan to recruit 156 participants meeting established knee OA criteria. Following informed consent, participants will be randomised to receive either CSI or PT. All participants will receive instruction on recommended exercise and weight control strategies plus usual medical care. The CSI intervention consisting of 3 injections and the PT intervention consisting of 8–12 sessions will be spaced over 12 months. Measures of the dependent variables (DVs) will occur at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 6 months and 12 months post enrolment. This pragmatic, randomised clinical trial will be a mixed-model 2×5 factorial design. The independent variables are treatment (CSI and PT) and time with five levels from baseline to 1 year. The primary DV is the Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). We will also compare healthcare utilisation between the 2 groups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by the Madigan Army Medical Center Institutional Review Board. The authors intend to publish the results in a peer-reviewed source. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01427153. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4823390 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48233902016-04-19 A multicentre randomised, 1-year comparative effectiveness, parallel-group trial protocol of a physical therapy approach compared to corticosteroid injections Deyle, Gail D Gill, Norman W Rhon, Daniel I Allen, Chris S Allison, Stephen C Hando, Ben R Petersen, Evan J Dusenberry, Douglas I Bellamy, Nicholas BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION: Corticosteroid injections (CSIs) are commonly used as an initial or a primary intervention for knee osteoarthritis (OA). Consistent evidence indicates CSIs offer symptom relief with conflicting reports regarding long-term efficacy. Physical therapy (PT) offers a non-invasive alternative. There is moderate evidence suggesting short-term and long-term symptom relief and functional improvement with PT interventions. Patients with knee OA are more commonly prescribed CSI than PT prior to total joint replacement. UnitedHealthcare and Military Health System data show substantially more total knee replacement patients receive preoperative CSI than PT. There are no studies comparing CSI to a PT approach in individuals with knee OA. The primary objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of CSI to PT in individuals with knee OA at 1, 2 and 12 months. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We plan to recruit 156 participants meeting established knee OA criteria. Following informed consent, participants will be randomised to receive either CSI or PT. All participants will receive instruction on recommended exercise and weight control strategies plus usual medical care. The CSI intervention consisting of 3 injections and the PT intervention consisting of 8–12 sessions will be spaced over 12 months. Measures of the dependent variables (DVs) will occur at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 6 months and 12 months post enrolment. This pragmatic, randomised clinical trial will be a mixed-model 2×5 factorial design. The independent variables are treatment (CSI and PT) and time with five levels from baseline to 1 year. The primary DV is the Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). We will also compare healthcare utilisation between the 2 groups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by the Madigan Army Medical Center Institutional Review Board. The authors intend to publish the results in a peer-reviewed source. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01427153. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4823390/ /pubmed/27033961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010528 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Rehabilitation Medicine Deyle, Gail D Gill, Norman W Rhon, Daniel I Allen, Chris S Allison, Stephen C Hando, Ben R Petersen, Evan J Dusenberry, Douglas I Bellamy, Nicholas A multicentre randomised, 1-year comparative effectiveness, parallel-group trial protocol of a physical therapy approach compared to corticosteroid injections |
title | A multicentre randomised, 1-year comparative effectiveness, parallel-group trial protocol of a physical therapy approach compared to corticosteroid injections |
title_full | A multicentre randomised, 1-year comparative effectiveness, parallel-group trial protocol of a physical therapy approach compared to corticosteroid injections |
title_fullStr | A multicentre randomised, 1-year comparative effectiveness, parallel-group trial protocol of a physical therapy approach compared to corticosteroid injections |
title_full_unstemmed | A multicentre randomised, 1-year comparative effectiveness, parallel-group trial protocol of a physical therapy approach compared to corticosteroid injections |
title_short | A multicentre randomised, 1-year comparative effectiveness, parallel-group trial protocol of a physical therapy approach compared to corticosteroid injections |
title_sort | multicentre randomised, 1-year comparative effectiveness, parallel-group trial protocol of a physical therapy approach compared to corticosteroid injections |
topic | Rehabilitation Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4823390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27033961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010528 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deylegaild amulticentrerandomised1yearcomparativeeffectivenessparallelgrouptrialprotocolofaphysicaltherapyapproachcomparedtocorticosteroidinjections AT gillnormanw amulticentrerandomised1yearcomparativeeffectivenessparallelgrouptrialprotocolofaphysicaltherapyapproachcomparedtocorticosteroidinjections AT rhondanieli amulticentrerandomised1yearcomparativeeffectivenessparallelgrouptrialprotocolofaphysicaltherapyapproachcomparedtocorticosteroidinjections AT allenchriss amulticentrerandomised1yearcomparativeeffectivenessparallelgrouptrialprotocolofaphysicaltherapyapproachcomparedtocorticosteroidinjections AT allisonstephenc amulticentrerandomised1yearcomparativeeffectivenessparallelgrouptrialprotocolofaphysicaltherapyapproachcomparedtocorticosteroidinjections AT handobenr amulticentrerandomised1yearcomparativeeffectivenessparallelgrouptrialprotocolofaphysicaltherapyapproachcomparedtocorticosteroidinjections AT petersenevanj amulticentrerandomised1yearcomparativeeffectivenessparallelgrouptrialprotocolofaphysicaltherapyapproachcomparedtocorticosteroidinjections AT dusenberrydouglasi amulticentrerandomised1yearcomparativeeffectivenessparallelgrouptrialprotocolofaphysicaltherapyapproachcomparedtocorticosteroidinjections AT bellamynicholas amulticentrerandomised1yearcomparativeeffectivenessparallelgrouptrialprotocolofaphysicaltherapyapproachcomparedtocorticosteroidinjections AT deylegaild multicentrerandomised1yearcomparativeeffectivenessparallelgrouptrialprotocolofaphysicaltherapyapproachcomparedtocorticosteroidinjections AT gillnormanw multicentrerandomised1yearcomparativeeffectivenessparallelgrouptrialprotocolofaphysicaltherapyapproachcomparedtocorticosteroidinjections AT rhondanieli multicentrerandomised1yearcomparativeeffectivenessparallelgrouptrialprotocolofaphysicaltherapyapproachcomparedtocorticosteroidinjections AT allenchriss multicentrerandomised1yearcomparativeeffectivenessparallelgrouptrialprotocolofaphysicaltherapyapproachcomparedtocorticosteroidinjections AT allisonstephenc multicentrerandomised1yearcomparativeeffectivenessparallelgrouptrialprotocolofaphysicaltherapyapproachcomparedtocorticosteroidinjections AT handobenr multicentrerandomised1yearcomparativeeffectivenessparallelgrouptrialprotocolofaphysicaltherapyapproachcomparedtocorticosteroidinjections AT petersenevanj multicentrerandomised1yearcomparativeeffectivenessparallelgrouptrialprotocolofaphysicaltherapyapproachcomparedtocorticosteroidinjections AT dusenberrydouglasi multicentrerandomised1yearcomparativeeffectivenessparallelgrouptrialprotocolofaphysicaltherapyapproachcomparedtocorticosteroidinjections AT bellamynicholas multicentrerandomised1yearcomparativeeffectivenessparallelgrouptrialprotocolofaphysicaltherapyapproachcomparedtocorticosteroidinjections |