Cargando…

Temperature Values Variability in Piezoelectric Implant Site Preparation: Differences between Cortical and Corticocancellous Bovine Bone

Purpose. Various parameters can influence temperature rise and detection during implant site preparation. The aim of this study is to investigate local temperature values in cortical and corticocancellous bovine bone during early stages of piezoelectric implant site preparation. Materials and Method...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lamazza, Luca, Garreffa, Girolamo, Laurito, Domenica, Lollobrigida, Marco, Palmieri, Luigi, De Biase, Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4823492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27110567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6473680
_version_ 1782425928854405120
author Lamazza, Luca
Garreffa, Girolamo
Laurito, Domenica
Lollobrigida, Marco
Palmieri, Luigi
De Biase, Alberto
author_facet Lamazza, Luca
Garreffa, Girolamo
Laurito, Domenica
Lollobrigida, Marco
Palmieri, Luigi
De Biase, Alberto
author_sort Lamazza, Luca
collection PubMed
description Purpose. Various parameters can influence temperature rise and detection during implant site preparation. The aim of this study is to investigate local temperature values in cortical and corticocancellous bovine bone during early stages of piezoelectric implant site preparation. Materials and Methods. 20 osteotomies were performed using a diamond tip (IM1s, Mectron Medical Technology, Carasco, Italy) on two different types of bovine bone samples, cortical and corticocancellous, respectively. A standardized protocol was designed to provide constant working conditions. Temperatures were measured in real time at a fixed position by a fiber optic thermometer. Results. Significantly higher drilling time (154.90 sec versus 99.00 sec; p < 0.0001) and temperatures (39.26°C versus 34.73°C; p = 0.043) were observed in the cortical group compared to the corticocancellous group. A remarkable variability of results characterized the corticocancellous blocks as compared to the blocks of pure cortical bone. Conclusion. Bone samples can influence heat generation during in vitro implant site preparation. When compared to cortical bone, corticocancellous samples present more variability in temperature values. Even controlling most experimental factors, the impact of bone samples still remains one of the main causes of temperature variability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4823492
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48234922016-04-24 Temperature Values Variability in Piezoelectric Implant Site Preparation: Differences between Cortical and Corticocancellous Bovine Bone Lamazza, Luca Garreffa, Girolamo Laurito, Domenica Lollobrigida, Marco Palmieri, Luigi De Biase, Alberto Biomed Res Int Research Article Purpose. Various parameters can influence temperature rise and detection during implant site preparation. The aim of this study is to investigate local temperature values in cortical and corticocancellous bovine bone during early stages of piezoelectric implant site preparation. Materials and Methods. 20 osteotomies were performed using a diamond tip (IM1s, Mectron Medical Technology, Carasco, Italy) on two different types of bovine bone samples, cortical and corticocancellous, respectively. A standardized protocol was designed to provide constant working conditions. Temperatures were measured in real time at a fixed position by a fiber optic thermometer. Results. Significantly higher drilling time (154.90 sec versus 99.00 sec; p < 0.0001) and temperatures (39.26°C versus 34.73°C; p = 0.043) were observed in the cortical group compared to the corticocancellous group. A remarkable variability of results characterized the corticocancellous blocks as compared to the blocks of pure cortical bone. Conclusion. Bone samples can influence heat generation during in vitro implant site preparation. When compared to cortical bone, corticocancellous samples present more variability in temperature values. Even controlling most experimental factors, the impact of bone samples still remains one of the main causes of temperature variability. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4823492/ /pubmed/27110567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6473680 Text en Copyright © 2016 Luca Lamazza et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lamazza, Luca
Garreffa, Girolamo
Laurito, Domenica
Lollobrigida, Marco
Palmieri, Luigi
De Biase, Alberto
Temperature Values Variability in Piezoelectric Implant Site Preparation: Differences between Cortical and Corticocancellous Bovine Bone
title Temperature Values Variability in Piezoelectric Implant Site Preparation: Differences between Cortical and Corticocancellous Bovine Bone
title_full Temperature Values Variability in Piezoelectric Implant Site Preparation: Differences between Cortical and Corticocancellous Bovine Bone
title_fullStr Temperature Values Variability in Piezoelectric Implant Site Preparation: Differences between Cortical and Corticocancellous Bovine Bone
title_full_unstemmed Temperature Values Variability in Piezoelectric Implant Site Preparation: Differences between Cortical and Corticocancellous Bovine Bone
title_short Temperature Values Variability in Piezoelectric Implant Site Preparation: Differences between Cortical and Corticocancellous Bovine Bone
title_sort temperature values variability in piezoelectric implant site preparation: differences between cortical and corticocancellous bovine bone
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4823492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27110567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6473680
work_keys_str_mv AT lamazzaluca temperaturevaluesvariabilityinpiezoelectricimplantsitepreparationdifferencesbetweencorticalandcorticocancellousbovinebone
AT garreffagirolamo temperaturevaluesvariabilityinpiezoelectricimplantsitepreparationdifferencesbetweencorticalandcorticocancellousbovinebone
AT lauritodomenica temperaturevaluesvariabilityinpiezoelectricimplantsitepreparationdifferencesbetweencorticalandcorticocancellousbovinebone
AT lollobrigidamarco temperaturevaluesvariabilityinpiezoelectricimplantsitepreparationdifferencesbetweencorticalandcorticocancellousbovinebone
AT palmieriluigi temperaturevaluesvariabilityinpiezoelectricimplantsitepreparationdifferencesbetweencorticalandcorticocancellousbovinebone
AT debiasealberto temperaturevaluesvariabilityinpiezoelectricimplantsitepreparationdifferencesbetweencorticalandcorticocancellousbovinebone