Cargando…
Defibrillation time intervals and outcomes of cardiac arrest in hospital: retrospective cohort study from Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry
Objective To describe temporal trends in the time interval between first and second attempts at defibrillation and the association between this time interval and outcomes in patients with persistent ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) arrest in hospital. Design Retrospective...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4823520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27052620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i1653 |
_version_ | 1782425935324119040 |
---|---|
author | Bradley, Steven M Liu, Wenhui Chan, Paul S Nallamothu, Brahmajee K Grunwald, Gary K Self, Alyssa Sasson, Comilla Varosy, Paul D Anderson, Monique L Schneider, Preston M Ho, P Michael |
author_facet | Bradley, Steven M Liu, Wenhui Chan, Paul S Nallamothu, Brahmajee K Grunwald, Gary K Self, Alyssa Sasson, Comilla Varosy, Paul D Anderson, Monique L Schneider, Preston M Ho, P Michael |
author_sort | Bradley, Steven M |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To describe temporal trends in the time interval between first and second attempts at defibrillation and the association between this time interval and outcomes in patients with persistent ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) arrest in hospital. Design Retrospective cohort study Setting 172 hospitals in the United States participating in the Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry, 2004-12. Participants Adults who received a second defibrillation attempt for persistent VT/VF arrest within three minutes of a first attempt. Interventions Second defibrillation attempts categorized as early (time interval of up to and including one minute between first and second defibrillation attempts) or deferred (time interval of more than one minute between first and second defibrillation attempts). Main outcome measure Survival to hospital discharge. Results Among 2733 patients with persistent VT/VF after the first defibrillation attempt, 1121 (41%) received a deferred second attempt. Deferred second defibrillation for persistent VT/VF increased from 26% in 2004 to 57% in 2012 (P<0.001 for trend). Compared with early second defibrillation, unadjusted patient outcomes were significantly worse with deferred second defibrillation (57.4% v 62.5% for return of spontaneous circulation, 38.4% v 43.6% for survival to 24 hours, and 24.7% v 30.8% for survival to hospital discharge; P<0.01 for all comparisons). After risk adjustment, deferred second defibrillation was not associated with survival to hospital discharge (propensity weighting adjusted risk ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.01; P=0.08; hierarchical regression adjusted 0.92, 0.83 to 1.02; P=0.1). Conclusions Since 2004, the use of deferred second defibrillation for persistent VT/VF in hospital has doubled. Deferred second defibrillation was not associated with improved survival. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4823520 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48235202016-04-19 Defibrillation time intervals and outcomes of cardiac arrest in hospital: retrospective cohort study from Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry Bradley, Steven M Liu, Wenhui Chan, Paul S Nallamothu, Brahmajee K Grunwald, Gary K Self, Alyssa Sasson, Comilla Varosy, Paul D Anderson, Monique L Schneider, Preston M Ho, P Michael BMJ Research Objective To describe temporal trends in the time interval between first and second attempts at defibrillation and the association between this time interval and outcomes in patients with persistent ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) arrest in hospital. Design Retrospective cohort study Setting 172 hospitals in the United States participating in the Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry, 2004-12. Participants Adults who received a second defibrillation attempt for persistent VT/VF arrest within three minutes of a first attempt. Interventions Second defibrillation attempts categorized as early (time interval of up to and including one minute between first and second defibrillation attempts) or deferred (time interval of more than one minute between first and second defibrillation attempts). Main outcome measure Survival to hospital discharge. Results Among 2733 patients with persistent VT/VF after the first defibrillation attempt, 1121 (41%) received a deferred second attempt. Deferred second defibrillation for persistent VT/VF increased from 26% in 2004 to 57% in 2012 (P<0.001 for trend). Compared with early second defibrillation, unadjusted patient outcomes were significantly worse with deferred second defibrillation (57.4% v 62.5% for return of spontaneous circulation, 38.4% v 43.6% for survival to 24 hours, and 24.7% v 30.8% for survival to hospital discharge; P<0.01 for all comparisons). After risk adjustment, deferred second defibrillation was not associated with survival to hospital discharge (propensity weighting adjusted risk ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.01; P=0.08; hierarchical regression adjusted 0.92, 0.83 to 1.02; P=0.1). Conclusions Since 2004, the use of deferred second defibrillation for persistent VT/VF in hospital has doubled. Deferred second defibrillation was not associated with improved survival. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2016-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4823520/ /pubmed/27052620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i1653 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Bradley, Steven M Liu, Wenhui Chan, Paul S Nallamothu, Brahmajee K Grunwald, Gary K Self, Alyssa Sasson, Comilla Varosy, Paul D Anderson, Monique L Schneider, Preston M Ho, P Michael Defibrillation time intervals and outcomes of cardiac arrest in hospital: retrospective cohort study from Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry |
title | Defibrillation time intervals and outcomes of cardiac arrest in hospital: retrospective cohort study from Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry |
title_full | Defibrillation time intervals and outcomes of cardiac arrest in hospital: retrospective cohort study from Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry |
title_fullStr | Defibrillation time intervals and outcomes of cardiac arrest in hospital: retrospective cohort study from Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry |
title_full_unstemmed | Defibrillation time intervals and outcomes of cardiac arrest in hospital: retrospective cohort study from Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry |
title_short | Defibrillation time intervals and outcomes of cardiac arrest in hospital: retrospective cohort study from Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry |
title_sort | defibrillation time intervals and outcomes of cardiac arrest in hospital: retrospective cohort study from get with the guidelines-resuscitation registry |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4823520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27052620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i1653 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bradleystevenm defibrillationtimeintervalsandoutcomesofcardiacarrestinhospitalretrospectivecohortstudyfromgetwiththeguidelinesresuscitationregistry AT liuwenhui defibrillationtimeintervalsandoutcomesofcardiacarrestinhospitalretrospectivecohortstudyfromgetwiththeguidelinesresuscitationregistry AT chanpauls defibrillationtimeintervalsandoutcomesofcardiacarrestinhospitalretrospectivecohortstudyfromgetwiththeguidelinesresuscitationregistry AT nallamothubrahmajeek defibrillationtimeintervalsandoutcomesofcardiacarrestinhospitalretrospectivecohortstudyfromgetwiththeguidelinesresuscitationregistry AT grunwaldgaryk defibrillationtimeintervalsandoutcomesofcardiacarrestinhospitalretrospectivecohortstudyfromgetwiththeguidelinesresuscitationregistry AT selfalyssa defibrillationtimeintervalsandoutcomesofcardiacarrestinhospitalretrospectivecohortstudyfromgetwiththeguidelinesresuscitationregistry AT sassoncomilla defibrillationtimeintervalsandoutcomesofcardiacarrestinhospitalretrospectivecohortstudyfromgetwiththeguidelinesresuscitationregistry AT varosypauld defibrillationtimeintervalsandoutcomesofcardiacarrestinhospitalretrospectivecohortstudyfromgetwiththeguidelinesresuscitationregistry AT andersonmoniquel defibrillationtimeintervalsandoutcomesofcardiacarrestinhospitalretrospectivecohortstudyfromgetwiththeguidelinesresuscitationregistry AT schneiderprestonm defibrillationtimeintervalsandoutcomesofcardiacarrestinhospitalretrospectivecohortstudyfromgetwiththeguidelinesresuscitationregistry AT hopmichael defibrillationtimeintervalsandoutcomesofcardiacarrestinhospitalretrospectivecohortstudyfromgetwiththeguidelinesresuscitationregistry |