Cargando…

Defibrillation time intervals and outcomes of cardiac arrest in hospital: retrospective cohort study from Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry

Objective To describe temporal trends in the time interval between first and second attempts at defibrillation and the association between this time interval and outcomes in patients with persistent ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) arrest in hospital. Design Retrospective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bradley, Steven M, Liu, Wenhui, Chan, Paul S, Nallamothu, Brahmajee K, Grunwald, Gary K, Self, Alyssa, Sasson, Comilla, Varosy, Paul D, Anderson, Monique L, Schneider, Preston M, Ho, P Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4823520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27052620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i1653
_version_ 1782425935324119040
author Bradley, Steven M
Liu, Wenhui
Chan, Paul S
Nallamothu, Brahmajee K
Grunwald, Gary K
Self, Alyssa
Sasson, Comilla
Varosy, Paul D
Anderson, Monique L
Schneider, Preston M
Ho, P Michael
author_facet Bradley, Steven M
Liu, Wenhui
Chan, Paul S
Nallamothu, Brahmajee K
Grunwald, Gary K
Self, Alyssa
Sasson, Comilla
Varosy, Paul D
Anderson, Monique L
Schneider, Preston M
Ho, P Michael
author_sort Bradley, Steven M
collection PubMed
description Objective To describe temporal trends in the time interval between first and second attempts at defibrillation and the association between this time interval and outcomes in patients with persistent ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) arrest in hospital. Design Retrospective cohort study Setting 172 hospitals in the United States participating in the Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry, 2004-12. Participants Adults who received a second defibrillation attempt for persistent VT/VF arrest within three minutes of a first attempt. Interventions Second defibrillation attempts categorized as early (time interval of up to and including one minute between first and second defibrillation attempts) or deferred (time interval of more than one minute between first and second defibrillation attempts). Main outcome measure Survival to hospital discharge. Results Among 2733 patients with persistent VT/VF after the first defibrillation attempt, 1121 (41%) received a deferred second attempt. Deferred second defibrillation for persistent VT/VF increased from 26% in 2004 to 57% in 2012 (P<0.001 for trend). Compared with early second defibrillation, unadjusted patient outcomes were significantly worse with deferred second defibrillation (57.4% v 62.5% for return of spontaneous circulation, 38.4% v 43.6% for survival to 24 hours, and 24.7% v 30.8% for survival to hospital discharge; P<0.01 for all comparisons). After risk adjustment, deferred second defibrillation was not associated with survival to hospital discharge (propensity weighting adjusted risk ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.01; P=0.08; hierarchical regression adjusted 0.92, 0.83 to 1.02; P=0.1). Conclusions Since 2004, the use of deferred second defibrillation for persistent VT/VF in hospital has doubled. Deferred second defibrillation was not associated with improved survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4823520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48235202016-04-19 Defibrillation time intervals and outcomes of cardiac arrest in hospital: retrospective cohort study from Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry Bradley, Steven M Liu, Wenhui Chan, Paul S Nallamothu, Brahmajee K Grunwald, Gary K Self, Alyssa Sasson, Comilla Varosy, Paul D Anderson, Monique L Schneider, Preston M Ho, P Michael BMJ Research Objective To describe temporal trends in the time interval between first and second attempts at defibrillation and the association between this time interval and outcomes in patients with persistent ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) arrest in hospital. Design Retrospective cohort study Setting 172 hospitals in the United States participating in the Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry, 2004-12. Participants Adults who received a second defibrillation attempt for persistent VT/VF arrest within three minutes of a first attempt. Interventions Second defibrillation attempts categorized as early (time interval of up to and including one minute between first and second defibrillation attempts) or deferred (time interval of more than one minute between first and second defibrillation attempts). Main outcome measure Survival to hospital discharge. Results Among 2733 patients with persistent VT/VF after the first defibrillation attempt, 1121 (41%) received a deferred second attempt. Deferred second defibrillation for persistent VT/VF increased from 26% in 2004 to 57% in 2012 (P<0.001 for trend). Compared with early second defibrillation, unadjusted patient outcomes were significantly worse with deferred second defibrillation (57.4% v 62.5% for return of spontaneous circulation, 38.4% v 43.6% for survival to 24 hours, and 24.7% v 30.8% for survival to hospital discharge; P<0.01 for all comparisons). After risk adjustment, deferred second defibrillation was not associated with survival to hospital discharge (propensity weighting adjusted risk ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.01; P=0.08; hierarchical regression adjusted 0.92, 0.83 to 1.02; P=0.1). Conclusions Since 2004, the use of deferred second defibrillation for persistent VT/VF in hospital has doubled. Deferred second defibrillation was not associated with improved survival. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2016-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4823520/ /pubmed/27052620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i1653 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Bradley, Steven M
Liu, Wenhui
Chan, Paul S
Nallamothu, Brahmajee K
Grunwald, Gary K
Self, Alyssa
Sasson, Comilla
Varosy, Paul D
Anderson, Monique L
Schneider, Preston M
Ho, P Michael
Defibrillation time intervals and outcomes of cardiac arrest in hospital: retrospective cohort study from Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry
title Defibrillation time intervals and outcomes of cardiac arrest in hospital: retrospective cohort study from Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry
title_full Defibrillation time intervals and outcomes of cardiac arrest in hospital: retrospective cohort study from Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry
title_fullStr Defibrillation time intervals and outcomes of cardiac arrest in hospital: retrospective cohort study from Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry
title_full_unstemmed Defibrillation time intervals and outcomes of cardiac arrest in hospital: retrospective cohort study from Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry
title_short Defibrillation time intervals and outcomes of cardiac arrest in hospital: retrospective cohort study from Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry
title_sort defibrillation time intervals and outcomes of cardiac arrest in hospital: retrospective cohort study from get with the guidelines-resuscitation registry
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4823520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27052620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i1653
work_keys_str_mv AT bradleystevenm defibrillationtimeintervalsandoutcomesofcardiacarrestinhospitalretrospectivecohortstudyfromgetwiththeguidelinesresuscitationregistry
AT liuwenhui defibrillationtimeintervalsandoutcomesofcardiacarrestinhospitalretrospectivecohortstudyfromgetwiththeguidelinesresuscitationregistry
AT chanpauls defibrillationtimeintervalsandoutcomesofcardiacarrestinhospitalretrospectivecohortstudyfromgetwiththeguidelinesresuscitationregistry
AT nallamothubrahmajeek defibrillationtimeintervalsandoutcomesofcardiacarrestinhospitalretrospectivecohortstudyfromgetwiththeguidelinesresuscitationregistry
AT grunwaldgaryk defibrillationtimeintervalsandoutcomesofcardiacarrestinhospitalretrospectivecohortstudyfromgetwiththeguidelinesresuscitationregistry
AT selfalyssa defibrillationtimeintervalsandoutcomesofcardiacarrestinhospitalretrospectivecohortstudyfromgetwiththeguidelinesresuscitationregistry
AT sassoncomilla defibrillationtimeintervalsandoutcomesofcardiacarrestinhospitalretrospectivecohortstudyfromgetwiththeguidelinesresuscitationregistry
AT varosypauld defibrillationtimeintervalsandoutcomesofcardiacarrestinhospitalretrospectivecohortstudyfromgetwiththeguidelinesresuscitationregistry
AT andersonmoniquel defibrillationtimeintervalsandoutcomesofcardiacarrestinhospitalretrospectivecohortstudyfromgetwiththeguidelinesresuscitationregistry
AT schneiderprestonm defibrillationtimeintervalsandoutcomesofcardiacarrestinhospitalretrospectivecohortstudyfromgetwiththeguidelinesresuscitationregistry
AT hopmichael defibrillationtimeintervalsandoutcomesofcardiacarrestinhospitalretrospectivecohortstudyfromgetwiththeguidelinesresuscitationregistry