Cargando…

Durable Clinical Effectiveness With Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in the Femoropopliteal Artery: 5-Year Results of the Zilver PTX Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND—: This randomized controlled trial evaluated clinical durability of Zilver PTX, a paclitaxel-coated drug-eluting stent (DES), for femoropopliteal artery lesions. Outcomes compare primary DES versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), overall DES (primary and provisional) versus s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dake, Michael D., Ansel, Gary M., Jaff, Michael R., Ohki, Takao, Saxon, Richard R., Smouse, H. Bob, Machan, Lindsay S., Snyder, Scott A., O’Leary, Erin E., Ragheb, Anthony O., Zeller, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4823823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26969758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.016900
_version_ 1782425987816882176
author Dake, Michael D.
Ansel, Gary M.
Jaff, Michael R.
Ohki, Takao
Saxon, Richard R.
Smouse, H. Bob
Machan, Lindsay S.
Snyder, Scott A.
O’Leary, Erin E.
Ragheb, Anthony O.
Zeller, Thomas
author_facet Dake, Michael D.
Ansel, Gary M.
Jaff, Michael R.
Ohki, Takao
Saxon, Richard R.
Smouse, H. Bob
Machan, Lindsay S.
Snyder, Scott A.
O’Leary, Erin E.
Ragheb, Anthony O.
Zeller, Thomas
author_sort Dake, Michael D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND—: This randomized controlled trial evaluated clinical durability of Zilver PTX, a paclitaxel-coated drug-eluting stent (DES), for femoropopliteal artery lesions. Outcomes compare primary DES versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), overall DES (primary and provisional) versus standard care (PTA and provisional Zilver bare metal stent [BMS]), and provisional DES versus provisional BMS. METHODS AND RESULTS—: Patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal artery disease were randomly assigned to DES (n=236) or PTA (n=238). Approximately 91% had claudication; 9% had critical limb ischemia. Patients experiencing acute PTA failure underwent secondary randomization to provisional BMS (n=59) or DES (n=61). The 1-year primary end points of event-free survival and patency showed superiority of primary DES in comparison with PTA; these results were sustained through 5 years. Clinical benefit (freedom from persistent or worsening symptoms of ischemia; 79.8% versus 59.3%, P<0.01), patency (66.4% versus 43.4%, P<0.01), and freedom from reintervention (target lesion revascularization, 83.1% versus 67.6%, P<0.01) for the overall DES group were superior to standard care in nonrandomized comparisons. Similarly, clinical benefit (81.8% versus 63.8%, P=0.02), patency (72.4% versus 53.0%, P=0.03), and freedom from target lesion revascularization (84.9% versus 71.6%, P=0.06) with provisional DES were improved over provisional BMS. These results represent >40% relative risk reduction for restenosis and target lesion revascularization through 5 years for the overall DES in comparison with standard care and for provisional DES in comparison with provisional BMS. CONCLUSIONS—: The 5-year results from this large study provide long-term information previously unavailable regarding endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal artery disease. The Zilver PTX DES provided sustained safety and clinical durability in comparison with standard endovascular treatments. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00120406.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4823823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48238232016-04-21 Durable Clinical Effectiveness With Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in the Femoropopliteal Artery: 5-Year Results of the Zilver PTX Randomized Trial Dake, Michael D. Ansel, Gary M. Jaff, Michael R. Ohki, Takao Saxon, Richard R. Smouse, H. Bob Machan, Lindsay S. Snyder, Scott A. O’Leary, Erin E. Ragheb, Anthony O. Zeller, Thomas Circulation Original Articles BACKGROUND—: This randomized controlled trial evaluated clinical durability of Zilver PTX, a paclitaxel-coated drug-eluting stent (DES), for femoropopliteal artery lesions. Outcomes compare primary DES versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), overall DES (primary and provisional) versus standard care (PTA and provisional Zilver bare metal stent [BMS]), and provisional DES versus provisional BMS. METHODS AND RESULTS—: Patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal artery disease were randomly assigned to DES (n=236) or PTA (n=238). Approximately 91% had claudication; 9% had critical limb ischemia. Patients experiencing acute PTA failure underwent secondary randomization to provisional BMS (n=59) or DES (n=61). The 1-year primary end points of event-free survival and patency showed superiority of primary DES in comparison with PTA; these results were sustained through 5 years. Clinical benefit (freedom from persistent or worsening symptoms of ischemia; 79.8% versus 59.3%, P<0.01), patency (66.4% versus 43.4%, P<0.01), and freedom from reintervention (target lesion revascularization, 83.1% versus 67.6%, P<0.01) for the overall DES group were superior to standard care in nonrandomized comparisons. Similarly, clinical benefit (81.8% versus 63.8%, P=0.02), patency (72.4% versus 53.0%, P=0.03), and freedom from target lesion revascularization (84.9% versus 71.6%, P=0.06) with provisional DES were improved over provisional BMS. These results represent >40% relative risk reduction for restenosis and target lesion revascularization through 5 years for the overall DES in comparison with standard care and for provisional DES in comparison with provisional BMS. CONCLUSIONS—: The 5-year results from this large study provide long-term information previously unavailable regarding endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal artery disease. The Zilver PTX DES provided sustained safety and clinical durability in comparison with standard endovascular treatments. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00120406. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016-04-12 2016-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4823823/ /pubmed/26969758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.016900 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Circulation is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial-NoDervis (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited, the use is noncommercial, and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Dake, Michael D.
Ansel, Gary M.
Jaff, Michael R.
Ohki, Takao
Saxon, Richard R.
Smouse, H. Bob
Machan, Lindsay S.
Snyder, Scott A.
O’Leary, Erin E.
Ragheb, Anthony O.
Zeller, Thomas
Durable Clinical Effectiveness With Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in the Femoropopliteal Artery: 5-Year Results of the Zilver PTX Randomized Trial
title Durable Clinical Effectiveness With Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in the Femoropopliteal Artery: 5-Year Results of the Zilver PTX Randomized Trial
title_full Durable Clinical Effectiveness With Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in the Femoropopliteal Artery: 5-Year Results of the Zilver PTX Randomized Trial
title_fullStr Durable Clinical Effectiveness With Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in the Femoropopliteal Artery: 5-Year Results of the Zilver PTX Randomized Trial
title_full_unstemmed Durable Clinical Effectiveness With Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in the Femoropopliteal Artery: 5-Year Results of the Zilver PTX Randomized Trial
title_short Durable Clinical Effectiveness With Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in the Femoropopliteal Artery: 5-Year Results of the Zilver PTX Randomized Trial
title_sort durable clinical effectiveness with paclitaxel-eluting stents in the femoropopliteal artery: 5-year results of the zilver ptx randomized trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4823823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26969758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.016900
work_keys_str_mv AT dakemichaeld durableclinicaleffectivenesswithpaclitaxelelutingstentsinthefemoropoplitealartery5yearresultsofthezilverptxrandomizedtrial
AT anselgarym durableclinicaleffectivenesswithpaclitaxelelutingstentsinthefemoropoplitealartery5yearresultsofthezilverptxrandomizedtrial
AT jaffmichaelr durableclinicaleffectivenesswithpaclitaxelelutingstentsinthefemoropoplitealartery5yearresultsofthezilverptxrandomizedtrial
AT ohkitakao durableclinicaleffectivenesswithpaclitaxelelutingstentsinthefemoropoplitealartery5yearresultsofthezilverptxrandomizedtrial
AT saxonrichardr durableclinicaleffectivenesswithpaclitaxelelutingstentsinthefemoropoplitealartery5yearresultsofthezilverptxrandomizedtrial
AT smousehbob durableclinicaleffectivenesswithpaclitaxelelutingstentsinthefemoropoplitealartery5yearresultsofthezilverptxrandomizedtrial
AT machanlindsays durableclinicaleffectivenesswithpaclitaxelelutingstentsinthefemoropoplitealartery5yearresultsofthezilverptxrandomizedtrial
AT snyderscotta durableclinicaleffectivenesswithpaclitaxelelutingstentsinthefemoropoplitealartery5yearresultsofthezilverptxrandomizedtrial
AT olearyerine durableclinicaleffectivenesswithpaclitaxelelutingstentsinthefemoropoplitealartery5yearresultsofthezilverptxrandomizedtrial
AT raghebanthonyo durableclinicaleffectivenesswithpaclitaxelelutingstentsinthefemoropoplitealartery5yearresultsofthezilverptxrandomizedtrial
AT zellerthomas durableclinicaleffectivenesswithpaclitaxelelutingstentsinthefemoropoplitealartery5yearresultsofthezilverptxrandomizedtrial