Cargando…

Laparoscopic versus laparotomic surgery for adnexal masses: role in elderly

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to compare laparoscopy (LPS) and laparotomy (LPT), in terms of surgical outcomes, in elderly patients (>65 years) with adnexal masses. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a series of women older than 65 who had a diagnosis of adnexal masses. Then, all pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pulcinelli, F. M., Schimberni, M., Marci, R., Bellati, F., Caserta, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4823905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27056684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-0861-1
_version_ 1782426007097049088
author Pulcinelli, F. M.
Schimberni, M.
Marci, R.
Bellati, F.
Caserta, D.
author_facet Pulcinelli, F. M.
Schimberni, M.
Marci, R.
Bellati, F.
Caserta, D.
author_sort Pulcinelli, F. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to compare laparoscopy (LPS) and laparotomy (LPT), in terms of surgical outcomes, in elderly patients (>65 years) with adnexal masses. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a series of women older than 65 who had a diagnosis of adnexal masses. Then, all patients were divided into two different groups according to the type of surgery: 27 who underwent LPS (LPS group) and 24 who underwent LPT (LPT group). We took into consideration: age, comorbidity, histological diagnosis, surgery approach, and surgical outcome. Then, we calculated the percentages of all of these data and then χ(2) test and t-Student test were used to calculate the p value, to compare the two surgical techniques. A p value lower than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: At first, we evaluated the relation between the diagnosis and the surgery approach, and we obtained statistically significant results for serous cyst, adenocarcinoma serous/mucinous, and others, and the table highlights that some of the benign masses were mostly treated with LPS, while borderline and malignant masses were treated with LPT. Then, we evaluated the comorbidities of the patients, and we found that those cases had a significantly higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease and metabolic diseases. Finally, we compared the surgery outcome of LPS versus LPT surgeries for adnexal masses in elderly women, and there were statistically significant results for postoperative complications, number of patients who needed drainage, and number of days of hospitalization after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that the patients who underwent LPS, compared to the patients who underwent LPT, have better outcomes in terms of postoperative complications (7.4 % with LPS and 37 % with LPT), number of patients who needed drainage (11.1 % with LPS and 62.5 % with LPT), and number of days of hospitalization after surgery, in term of mean (5 for LPS and 10.9 in term of LPT).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4823905
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48239052016-04-08 Laparoscopic versus laparotomic surgery for adnexal masses: role in elderly Pulcinelli, F. M. Schimberni, M. Marci, R. Bellati, F. Caserta, D. World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to compare laparoscopy (LPS) and laparotomy (LPT), in terms of surgical outcomes, in elderly patients (>65 years) with adnexal masses. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a series of women older than 65 who had a diagnosis of adnexal masses. Then, all patients were divided into two different groups according to the type of surgery: 27 who underwent LPS (LPS group) and 24 who underwent LPT (LPT group). We took into consideration: age, comorbidity, histological diagnosis, surgery approach, and surgical outcome. Then, we calculated the percentages of all of these data and then χ(2) test and t-Student test were used to calculate the p value, to compare the two surgical techniques. A p value lower than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: At first, we evaluated the relation between the diagnosis and the surgery approach, and we obtained statistically significant results for serous cyst, adenocarcinoma serous/mucinous, and others, and the table highlights that some of the benign masses were mostly treated with LPS, while borderline and malignant masses were treated with LPT. Then, we evaluated the comorbidities of the patients, and we found that those cases had a significantly higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease and metabolic diseases. Finally, we compared the surgery outcome of LPS versus LPT surgeries for adnexal masses in elderly women, and there were statistically significant results for postoperative complications, number of patients who needed drainage, and number of days of hospitalization after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that the patients who underwent LPS, compared to the patients who underwent LPT, have better outcomes in terms of postoperative complications (7.4 % with LPS and 37 % with LPT), number of patients who needed drainage (11.1 % with LPS and 62.5 % with LPT), and number of days of hospitalization after surgery, in term of mean (5 for LPS and 10.9 in term of LPT). BioMed Central 2016-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4823905/ /pubmed/27056684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-0861-1 Text en © Pulcinelli et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Pulcinelli, F. M.
Schimberni, M.
Marci, R.
Bellati, F.
Caserta, D.
Laparoscopic versus laparotomic surgery for adnexal masses: role in elderly
title Laparoscopic versus laparotomic surgery for adnexal masses: role in elderly
title_full Laparoscopic versus laparotomic surgery for adnexal masses: role in elderly
title_fullStr Laparoscopic versus laparotomic surgery for adnexal masses: role in elderly
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic versus laparotomic surgery for adnexal masses: role in elderly
title_short Laparoscopic versus laparotomic surgery for adnexal masses: role in elderly
title_sort laparoscopic versus laparotomic surgery for adnexal masses: role in elderly
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4823905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27056684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-0861-1
work_keys_str_mv AT pulcinellifm laparoscopicversuslaparotomicsurgeryforadnexalmassesroleinelderly
AT schimbernim laparoscopicversuslaparotomicsurgeryforadnexalmassesroleinelderly
AT marcir laparoscopicversuslaparotomicsurgeryforadnexalmassesroleinelderly
AT bellatif laparoscopicversuslaparotomicsurgeryforadnexalmassesroleinelderly
AT casertad laparoscopicversuslaparotomicsurgeryforadnexalmassesroleinelderly