Cargando…

Oral Language Deficits in Familial Dyslexia: A Meta-Analysis and Review

This article reviews 95 publications (based on 21 independent samples) that have examined children at family risk of reading disorders. We report that children at family risk of dyslexia experience delayed language development as infants and toddlers. In the preschool period, they have significant d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Snowling, Margaret J., Melby-Lervåg, Monica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Psychological Association 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4824243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26727308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/bul0000037
_version_ 1782426054950912000
author Snowling, Margaret J.
Melby-Lervåg, Monica
author_facet Snowling, Margaret J.
Melby-Lervåg, Monica
author_sort Snowling, Margaret J.
collection PubMed
description This article reviews 95 publications (based on 21 independent samples) that have examined children at family risk of reading disorders. We report that children at family risk of dyslexia experience delayed language development as infants and toddlers. In the preschool period, they have significant difficulties in phonological processes as well as with broader language skills and in acquiring the foundations of decoding skill (letter knowledge, phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming [RAN]). Findings are mixed with regard to auditory and visual perception: they do not appear subject to slow motor development, but lack of control for comorbidities confounds interpretation. Longitudinal studies of outcomes show that children at family risk who go on to fulfil criteria for dyslexia have more severe impairments in preschool language than those who are defined as normal readers, but the latter group do less well than controls. Similarly at school age, family risk of dyslexia is associated with significantly poor phonological awareness and literacy skills. Although there is no strong evidence that children at family risk are brought up in an environment that differs significantly from that of controls, their parents tend to have lower educational levels and read less frequently to themselves. Together, the findings suggest that a phonological processing deficit can be conceptualized as an endophenotype of dyslexia that increases the continuous risk of reading difficulties; in turn its impact may be moderated by protective factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4824243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher American Psychological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48242432016-04-20 Oral Language Deficits in Familial Dyslexia: A Meta-Analysis and Review Snowling, Margaret J. Melby-Lervåg, Monica Psychol Bull Articles This article reviews 95 publications (based on 21 independent samples) that have examined children at family risk of reading disorders. We report that children at family risk of dyslexia experience delayed language development as infants and toddlers. In the preschool period, they have significant difficulties in phonological processes as well as with broader language skills and in acquiring the foundations of decoding skill (letter knowledge, phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming [RAN]). Findings are mixed with regard to auditory and visual perception: they do not appear subject to slow motor development, but lack of control for comorbidities confounds interpretation. Longitudinal studies of outcomes show that children at family risk who go on to fulfil criteria for dyslexia have more severe impairments in preschool language than those who are defined as normal readers, but the latter group do less well than controls. Similarly at school age, family risk of dyslexia is associated with significantly poor phonological awareness and literacy skills. Although there is no strong evidence that children at family risk are brought up in an environment that differs significantly from that of controls, their parents tend to have lower educational levels and read less frequently to themselves. Together, the findings suggest that a phonological processing deficit can be conceptualized as an endophenotype of dyslexia that increases the continuous risk of reading difficulties; in turn its impact may be moderated by protective factors. American Psychological Association 2016-01-04 2016-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4824243/ /pubmed/26727308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/bul0000037 Text en © 2016 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article has been published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s). Author(s) grant(s) the American Psychological Association the exclusive right to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher.
spellingShingle Articles
Snowling, Margaret J.
Melby-Lervåg, Monica
Oral Language Deficits in Familial Dyslexia: A Meta-Analysis and Review
title Oral Language Deficits in Familial Dyslexia: A Meta-Analysis and Review
title_full Oral Language Deficits in Familial Dyslexia: A Meta-Analysis and Review
title_fullStr Oral Language Deficits in Familial Dyslexia: A Meta-Analysis and Review
title_full_unstemmed Oral Language Deficits in Familial Dyslexia: A Meta-Analysis and Review
title_short Oral Language Deficits in Familial Dyslexia: A Meta-Analysis and Review
title_sort oral language deficits in familial dyslexia: a meta-analysis and review
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4824243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26727308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/bul0000037
work_keys_str_mv AT snowlingmargaretj orallanguagedeficitsinfamilialdyslexiaametaanalysisandreview
AT melbylervagmonica orallanguagedeficitsinfamilialdyslexiaametaanalysisandreview