Cargando…

Is biofilm removal properly assessed? Comparison of different quantification methods in a 96-well plate system

Various methods have been reported to quantify total biofilm or different components of biofilm; however, these methods are often confusedly used, leading to discrepancies and misleading results. In this study, different methods for quantification of biofilm, including those for total biomass, total...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stiefel, Philipp, Rosenberg, Urs, Schneider, Jana, Mauerhofer, Stefan, Maniura-Weber, Katharina, Ren, Qun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4824840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26923144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7396-9
_version_ 1782426140486402048
author Stiefel, Philipp
Rosenberg, Urs
Schneider, Jana
Mauerhofer, Stefan
Maniura-Weber, Katharina
Ren, Qun
author_facet Stiefel, Philipp
Rosenberg, Urs
Schneider, Jana
Mauerhofer, Stefan
Maniura-Weber, Katharina
Ren, Qun
author_sort Stiefel, Philipp
collection PubMed
description Various methods have been reported to quantify total biofilm or different components of biofilm; however, these methods are often confusedly used, leading to discrepancies and misleading results. In this study, different methods for quantification of biofilm, including those for total biomass, total amount of bacterial cells, viable cell number, and amount of extracellular polymeric substances, were systematically compared in microtiter plates. To evaluate which method is suitable for assessment of biofilm removal and for bacterial killing, biofilm samples were treated with various cleaners possessing removing and/or killing capacities. It was found that most of the methods tested in this study in general exhibited high reproducibility and repeatability. Crystal Violet staining was a simple but reliable method for total biomass quantification. Total bacteria cell numbers could be reliably quantified by the fluorescent DNA-binding dye Acridine Orange. Viable cells could be quantified by either an ATP-based assay or a proliferation assay. Both of these viability methods showed a broad detection range and led to precise measurement. For quantification of proteins in the biofilm, staining with fluorescein isothiocyanate was most suitable. Furthermore, it was revealed that a combination of different methods is required to determine if a cleaner kills or removes biofilm. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00253-016-7396-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4824840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48248402016-04-20 Is biofilm removal properly assessed? Comparison of different quantification methods in a 96-well plate system Stiefel, Philipp Rosenberg, Urs Schneider, Jana Mauerhofer, Stefan Maniura-Weber, Katharina Ren, Qun Appl Microbiol Biotechnol Methods and Protocols Various methods have been reported to quantify total biofilm or different components of biofilm; however, these methods are often confusedly used, leading to discrepancies and misleading results. In this study, different methods for quantification of biofilm, including those for total biomass, total amount of bacterial cells, viable cell number, and amount of extracellular polymeric substances, were systematically compared in microtiter plates. To evaluate which method is suitable for assessment of biofilm removal and for bacterial killing, biofilm samples were treated with various cleaners possessing removing and/or killing capacities. It was found that most of the methods tested in this study in general exhibited high reproducibility and repeatability. Crystal Violet staining was a simple but reliable method for total biomass quantification. Total bacteria cell numbers could be reliably quantified by the fluorescent DNA-binding dye Acridine Orange. Viable cells could be quantified by either an ATP-based assay or a proliferation assay. Both of these viability methods showed a broad detection range and led to precise measurement. For quantification of proteins in the biofilm, staining with fluorescein isothiocyanate was most suitable. Furthermore, it was revealed that a combination of different methods is required to determine if a cleaner kills or removes biofilm. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00253-016-7396-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-02-29 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4824840/ /pubmed/26923144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7396-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Methods and Protocols
Stiefel, Philipp
Rosenberg, Urs
Schneider, Jana
Mauerhofer, Stefan
Maniura-Weber, Katharina
Ren, Qun
Is biofilm removal properly assessed? Comparison of different quantification methods in a 96-well plate system
title Is biofilm removal properly assessed? Comparison of different quantification methods in a 96-well plate system
title_full Is biofilm removal properly assessed? Comparison of different quantification methods in a 96-well plate system
title_fullStr Is biofilm removal properly assessed? Comparison of different quantification methods in a 96-well plate system
title_full_unstemmed Is biofilm removal properly assessed? Comparison of different quantification methods in a 96-well plate system
title_short Is biofilm removal properly assessed? Comparison of different quantification methods in a 96-well plate system
title_sort is biofilm removal properly assessed? comparison of different quantification methods in a 96-well plate system
topic Methods and Protocols
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4824840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26923144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7396-9
work_keys_str_mv AT stiefelphilipp isbiofilmremovalproperlyassessedcomparisonofdifferentquantificationmethodsina96wellplatesystem
AT rosenbergurs isbiofilmremovalproperlyassessedcomparisonofdifferentquantificationmethodsina96wellplatesystem
AT schneiderjana isbiofilmremovalproperlyassessedcomparisonofdifferentquantificationmethodsina96wellplatesystem
AT mauerhoferstefan isbiofilmremovalproperlyassessedcomparisonofdifferentquantificationmethodsina96wellplatesystem
AT maniuraweberkatharina isbiofilmremovalproperlyassessedcomparisonofdifferentquantificationmethodsina96wellplatesystem
AT renqun isbiofilmremovalproperlyassessedcomparisonofdifferentquantificationmethodsina96wellplatesystem