Cargando…

Aboveground insect herbivory increases plant competitive asymmetry, while belowground herbivory mitigates the effect

Insect herbivores can shift the composition of a plant community, but the mechanism underlying such shifts remains largely unexplored. A possibility is that insects alter the competitive symmetry between plant species. The effect of herbivory on competition likely depends on whether the plants are s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borgström, Pernilla, Strengbom, Joachim, Viketoft, Maria, Bommarco, Riccardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4824911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27069805
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1867
_version_ 1782426153217163264
author Borgström, Pernilla
Strengbom, Joachim
Viketoft, Maria
Bommarco, Riccardo
author_facet Borgström, Pernilla
Strengbom, Joachim
Viketoft, Maria
Bommarco, Riccardo
author_sort Borgström, Pernilla
collection PubMed
description Insect herbivores can shift the composition of a plant community, but the mechanism underlying such shifts remains largely unexplored. A possibility is that insects alter the competitive symmetry between plant species. The effect of herbivory on competition likely depends on whether the plants are subjected to aboveground or belowground herbivory or both, and also depends on soil nitrogen levels. It is unclear how these biotic and abiotic factors interactively affect competition. In a greenhouse experiment, we measured competition between two coexisting grass species that respond differently to nitrogen deposition: Dactylis glomerata L., which is competitively favoured by nitrogen addition, and Festuca rubra L., which is competitively favoured on nitrogen-poor soils. We predicted: (1) that aboveground herbivory would reduce competitive asymmetry at high soil nitrogen by reducing the competitive advantage of D. glomerata; and (2), that belowground herbivory would relax competition at low soil nitrogen, by reducing the competitive advantage of F. rubra. Aboveground herbivory caused a 46% decrease in the competitive ability of F. rubra, and a 23% increase in that of D. glomerata, thus increasing competitive asymmetry, independently of soil nitrogen level. Belowground herbivory did not affect competitive symmetry, but the combined influence of above- and belowground herbivory was weaker than predicted from their individual effects. Belowground herbivory thus mitigated the increased competitive asymmetry caused by aboveground herbivory. D. glomerata remained competitively dominant after the cessation of aboveground herbivory, showing that the influence of herbivory continued beyond the feeding period. We showed that insect herbivory can strongly influence plant competitive interactions. In our experimental plant community, aboveground insect herbivory increased the risk of competitive exclusion of F. rubra. Belowground herbivory appeared to mitigate the influence of aboveground herbivory, and this mechanism may play a role for plant species coexistence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4824911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48249112016-04-11 Aboveground insect herbivory increases plant competitive asymmetry, while belowground herbivory mitigates the effect Borgström, Pernilla Strengbom, Joachim Viketoft, Maria Bommarco, Riccardo PeerJ Biodiversity Insect herbivores can shift the composition of a plant community, but the mechanism underlying such shifts remains largely unexplored. A possibility is that insects alter the competitive symmetry between plant species. The effect of herbivory on competition likely depends on whether the plants are subjected to aboveground or belowground herbivory or both, and also depends on soil nitrogen levels. It is unclear how these biotic and abiotic factors interactively affect competition. In a greenhouse experiment, we measured competition between two coexisting grass species that respond differently to nitrogen deposition: Dactylis glomerata L., which is competitively favoured by nitrogen addition, and Festuca rubra L., which is competitively favoured on nitrogen-poor soils. We predicted: (1) that aboveground herbivory would reduce competitive asymmetry at high soil nitrogen by reducing the competitive advantage of D. glomerata; and (2), that belowground herbivory would relax competition at low soil nitrogen, by reducing the competitive advantage of F. rubra. Aboveground herbivory caused a 46% decrease in the competitive ability of F. rubra, and a 23% increase in that of D. glomerata, thus increasing competitive asymmetry, independently of soil nitrogen level. Belowground herbivory did not affect competitive symmetry, but the combined influence of above- and belowground herbivory was weaker than predicted from their individual effects. Belowground herbivory thus mitigated the increased competitive asymmetry caused by aboveground herbivory. D. glomerata remained competitively dominant after the cessation of aboveground herbivory, showing that the influence of herbivory continued beyond the feeding period. We showed that insect herbivory can strongly influence plant competitive interactions. In our experimental plant community, aboveground insect herbivory increased the risk of competitive exclusion of F. rubra. Belowground herbivory appeared to mitigate the influence of aboveground herbivory, and this mechanism may play a role for plant species coexistence. PeerJ Inc. 2016-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4824911/ /pubmed/27069805 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1867 Text en ©2016 Borgström et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Borgström, Pernilla
Strengbom, Joachim
Viketoft, Maria
Bommarco, Riccardo
Aboveground insect herbivory increases plant competitive asymmetry, while belowground herbivory mitigates the effect
title Aboveground insect herbivory increases plant competitive asymmetry, while belowground herbivory mitigates the effect
title_full Aboveground insect herbivory increases plant competitive asymmetry, while belowground herbivory mitigates the effect
title_fullStr Aboveground insect herbivory increases plant competitive asymmetry, while belowground herbivory mitigates the effect
title_full_unstemmed Aboveground insect herbivory increases plant competitive asymmetry, while belowground herbivory mitigates the effect
title_short Aboveground insect herbivory increases plant competitive asymmetry, while belowground herbivory mitigates the effect
title_sort aboveground insect herbivory increases plant competitive asymmetry, while belowground herbivory mitigates the effect
topic Biodiversity
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4824911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27069805
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1867
work_keys_str_mv AT borgstrompernilla abovegroundinsectherbivoryincreasesplantcompetitiveasymmetrywhilebelowgroundherbivorymitigatestheeffect
AT strengbomjoachim abovegroundinsectherbivoryincreasesplantcompetitiveasymmetrywhilebelowgroundherbivorymitigatestheeffect
AT viketoftmaria abovegroundinsectherbivoryincreasesplantcompetitiveasymmetrywhilebelowgroundherbivorymitigatestheeffect
AT bommarcoriccardo abovegroundinsectherbivoryincreasesplantcompetitiveasymmetrywhilebelowgroundherbivorymitigatestheeffect