Cargando…

The Effect of Facilitated Tucking during Endotracheal Suctioning on Procedural Pain in Preterm Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study

BACKGROUND: Premature infants not only feel and understand the pain, but also respond more intensively compared with term infants. Non-pharmacological methods of pain control are suitable to relieve pain in painful procedures. The facilitated tucking position is considered as a non-pharmacological m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alinejad-Naeini, Mona, Mohagheghi, Parisa, Peyrovi, Hamid, Mehran, Abbas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Canadian Center of Science and Education 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4825219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24999148
http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v6n4p278
_version_ 1782426182177783808
author Alinejad-Naeini, Mona
Mohagheghi, Parisa
Peyrovi, Hamid
Mehran, Abbas
author_facet Alinejad-Naeini, Mona
Mohagheghi, Parisa
Peyrovi, Hamid
Mehran, Abbas
author_sort Alinejad-Naeini, Mona
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Premature infants not only feel and understand the pain, but also respond more intensively compared with term infants. Non-pharmacological methods of pain control are suitable to relieve pain in painful procedures. The facilitated tucking position is considered as a non-pharmacological method of pain control in infants; however, its impact on frequent and repeated procedural pain such as endotracheal suctioning remains to be studied. OBJECTIVES: This paper is the report of a study that examined the impact of facilitated tucking position on behavioral pain during suctioning in premature neonates. Design: This was a clinical trial study with a crossover design. Settings: The study was conducted in a level II Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, located in a teaching hospital, affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Participants: Thirty four infants were enrolled in this study based on the following inclusion criteria: age between 29 to 37 weeks of gestational age, birth weight 1200 grams or more, having an endotracheal tube, no congenital anomalies, no seizures diagnosis, no chest tubes, no intracranial hemorrhage higher than degree II, not receiving opiates and sedatives four hours before intervention and not receiving any painful procedure at least half an hour before the intervention. Methods: The samples were randomly received a sequence of suctioning with/without or suctioning without/with facilitated tucking. Preterm Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) was used to collect the data. SPSS version 16.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: While 38.2% of infants experienced severe pain during suctioning without intervention, only 8.8% of them experienced severe pain during suctioning with intervention. The results of the paired t-test show that there is a statistically significant difference in the mean scores of pain between non-intervention and intervention cases (p<0.001), and the mean pain score substantially reduced in cases with intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Given the multiplicity of endotracheal suctioning frequency and the impossibility of frequent use of pharmacological methods of pain relief, the facilitated tucking position can be used as a safe non-pharmacological method for procedural pain management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4825219
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Canadian Center of Science and Education
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48252192016-04-21 The Effect of Facilitated Tucking during Endotracheal Suctioning on Procedural Pain in Preterm Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study Alinejad-Naeini, Mona Mohagheghi, Parisa Peyrovi, Hamid Mehran, Abbas Glob J Health Sci Articles BACKGROUND: Premature infants not only feel and understand the pain, but also respond more intensively compared with term infants. Non-pharmacological methods of pain control are suitable to relieve pain in painful procedures. The facilitated tucking position is considered as a non-pharmacological method of pain control in infants; however, its impact on frequent and repeated procedural pain such as endotracheal suctioning remains to be studied. OBJECTIVES: This paper is the report of a study that examined the impact of facilitated tucking position on behavioral pain during suctioning in premature neonates. Design: This was a clinical trial study with a crossover design. Settings: The study was conducted in a level II Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, located in a teaching hospital, affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Participants: Thirty four infants were enrolled in this study based on the following inclusion criteria: age between 29 to 37 weeks of gestational age, birth weight 1200 grams or more, having an endotracheal tube, no congenital anomalies, no seizures diagnosis, no chest tubes, no intracranial hemorrhage higher than degree II, not receiving opiates and sedatives four hours before intervention and not receiving any painful procedure at least half an hour before the intervention. Methods: The samples were randomly received a sequence of suctioning with/without or suctioning without/with facilitated tucking. Preterm Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) was used to collect the data. SPSS version 16.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: While 38.2% of infants experienced severe pain during suctioning without intervention, only 8.8% of them experienced severe pain during suctioning with intervention. The results of the paired t-test show that there is a statistically significant difference in the mean scores of pain between non-intervention and intervention cases (p<0.001), and the mean pain score substantially reduced in cases with intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Given the multiplicity of endotracheal suctioning frequency and the impossibility of frequent use of pharmacological methods of pain relief, the facilitated tucking position can be used as a safe non-pharmacological method for procedural pain management. Canadian Center of Science and Education 2014-07 2014-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4825219/ /pubmed/24999148 http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v6n4p278 Text en Copyright: © Canadian Center of Science and Education http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Alinejad-Naeini, Mona
Mohagheghi, Parisa
Peyrovi, Hamid
Mehran, Abbas
The Effect of Facilitated Tucking during Endotracheal Suctioning on Procedural Pain in Preterm Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study
title The Effect of Facilitated Tucking during Endotracheal Suctioning on Procedural Pain in Preterm Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study
title_full The Effect of Facilitated Tucking during Endotracheal Suctioning on Procedural Pain in Preterm Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study
title_fullStr The Effect of Facilitated Tucking during Endotracheal Suctioning on Procedural Pain in Preterm Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Facilitated Tucking during Endotracheal Suctioning on Procedural Pain in Preterm Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study
title_short The Effect of Facilitated Tucking during Endotracheal Suctioning on Procedural Pain in Preterm Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study
title_sort effect of facilitated tucking during endotracheal suctioning on procedural pain in preterm neonates: a randomized controlled crossover study
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4825219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24999148
http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v6n4p278
work_keys_str_mv AT alinejadnaeinimona theeffectoffacilitatedtuckingduringendotrachealsuctioningonproceduralpaininpretermneonatesarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT mohagheghiparisa theeffectoffacilitatedtuckingduringendotrachealsuctioningonproceduralpaininpretermneonatesarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT peyrovihamid theeffectoffacilitatedtuckingduringendotrachealsuctioningonproceduralpaininpretermneonatesarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT mehranabbas theeffectoffacilitatedtuckingduringendotrachealsuctioningonproceduralpaininpretermneonatesarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT alinejadnaeinimona effectoffacilitatedtuckingduringendotrachealsuctioningonproceduralpaininpretermneonatesarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT mohagheghiparisa effectoffacilitatedtuckingduringendotrachealsuctioningonproceduralpaininpretermneonatesarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT peyrovihamid effectoffacilitatedtuckingduringendotrachealsuctioningonproceduralpaininpretermneonatesarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT mehranabbas effectoffacilitatedtuckingduringendotrachealsuctioningonproceduralpaininpretermneonatesarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy