Cargando…

Uterine Contractions’ Pattern in Active Phase of Labor as a Predictor of Failure to Progress

BACKGROUND: Failure to progress remains a key indication for cesarean section which caused by different factors including uterine contractions. If it is diagnosed in the primary phase of labor, a better prognosis can thus be made. The purpose of this study was to find a possible correlation between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moghaddam, Tahereh Galini, Moslemizadeh, Nargess, Seifollahpour, Zahra, Shahhosseini, Zohreh, Danesh, Mahmonir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Canadian Center of Science and Education 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4825395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24762363
http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v6n3p200
_version_ 1782426212344266752
author Moghaddam, Tahereh Galini
Moslemizadeh, Nargess
Seifollahpour, Zahra
Shahhosseini, Zohreh
Danesh, Mahmonir
author_facet Moghaddam, Tahereh Galini
Moslemizadeh, Nargess
Seifollahpour, Zahra
Shahhosseini, Zohreh
Danesh, Mahmonir
author_sort Moghaddam, Tahereh Galini
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Failure to progress remains a key indication for cesarean section which caused by different factors including uterine contractions. If it is diagnosed in the primary phase of labor, a better prognosis can thus be made. The purpose of this study was to find a possible correlation between pattern of uterine contraction and progression of labor. METHOD: During this study, 120 women referred for delivery to an educational hospital’s maternity ward in the North of Iran in 2010 were included. Uterine contractions of mothers were recorded in dilatation of 4 to7 cm for an hour. In this way, F/R ratio which means the time that a contraction needs to return from its peak to baseline (Fall) divided to the time for a contraction to rise to its peak (Rise) was calculated. All of the participants were followed until delivery, vaginal delivery or caesarean section. RESULTS: Mean and standard deviation of fall to raise ratio was 1.54 ± 0.26 in mothers with vaginal delivery versus 1.74 ± 0.21 for others underwent caesarean section (OR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.005- 0.42, P < 0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values (positive and negative) of mentioned ratio were 68.32%, 70.01%, 69.55%, and 68.91%, respectively. CONCLUSION: By considering acceptable predictive value of uterine contractions’ pattern in the active phase of labor, it could help to timely diagnosis of failure to progress and consequently suitable intervention which probably maintain better health of both mother and fetus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4825395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Canadian Center of Science and Education
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48253952016-04-21 Uterine Contractions’ Pattern in Active Phase of Labor as a Predictor of Failure to Progress Moghaddam, Tahereh Galini Moslemizadeh, Nargess Seifollahpour, Zahra Shahhosseini, Zohreh Danesh, Mahmonir Glob J Health Sci Articles BACKGROUND: Failure to progress remains a key indication for cesarean section which caused by different factors including uterine contractions. If it is diagnosed in the primary phase of labor, a better prognosis can thus be made. The purpose of this study was to find a possible correlation between pattern of uterine contraction and progression of labor. METHOD: During this study, 120 women referred for delivery to an educational hospital’s maternity ward in the North of Iran in 2010 were included. Uterine contractions of mothers were recorded in dilatation of 4 to7 cm for an hour. In this way, F/R ratio which means the time that a contraction needs to return from its peak to baseline (Fall) divided to the time for a contraction to rise to its peak (Rise) was calculated. All of the participants were followed until delivery, vaginal delivery or caesarean section. RESULTS: Mean and standard deviation of fall to raise ratio was 1.54 ± 0.26 in mothers with vaginal delivery versus 1.74 ± 0.21 for others underwent caesarean section (OR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.005- 0.42, P < 0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values (positive and negative) of mentioned ratio were 68.32%, 70.01%, 69.55%, and 68.91%, respectively. CONCLUSION: By considering acceptable predictive value of uterine contractions’ pattern in the active phase of labor, it could help to timely diagnosis of failure to progress and consequently suitable intervention which probably maintain better health of both mother and fetus. Canadian Center of Science and Education 2014-05 2014-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4825395/ /pubmed/24762363 http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v6n3p200 Text en Copyright: © Canadian Center of Science and Education http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Moghaddam, Tahereh Galini
Moslemizadeh, Nargess
Seifollahpour, Zahra
Shahhosseini, Zohreh
Danesh, Mahmonir
Uterine Contractions’ Pattern in Active Phase of Labor as a Predictor of Failure to Progress
title Uterine Contractions’ Pattern in Active Phase of Labor as a Predictor of Failure to Progress
title_full Uterine Contractions’ Pattern in Active Phase of Labor as a Predictor of Failure to Progress
title_fullStr Uterine Contractions’ Pattern in Active Phase of Labor as a Predictor of Failure to Progress
title_full_unstemmed Uterine Contractions’ Pattern in Active Phase of Labor as a Predictor of Failure to Progress
title_short Uterine Contractions’ Pattern in Active Phase of Labor as a Predictor of Failure to Progress
title_sort uterine contractions’ pattern in active phase of labor as a predictor of failure to progress
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4825395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24762363
http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v6n3p200
work_keys_str_mv AT moghaddamtaherehgalini uterinecontractionspatterninactivephaseoflaborasapredictoroffailuretoprogress
AT moslemizadehnargess uterinecontractionspatterninactivephaseoflaborasapredictoroffailuretoprogress
AT seifollahpourzahra uterinecontractionspatterninactivephaseoflaborasapredictoroffailuretoprogress
AT shahhosseinizohreh uterinecontractionspatterninactivephaseoflaborasapredictoroffailuretoprogress
AT daneshmahmonir uterinecontractionspatterninactivephaseoflaborasapredictoroffailuretoprogress