Cargando…

A randomized, comparative, open-label study of efficacy and tolerability of alfuzosin, tamsulosin and silodosin in benign prostatic hyperplasia

OBJECTIVES: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common and progressive disease affecting elderly males, often associated with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). α1-blockers are the mainstay in symptomatic therapy of BPH. Because of their greater uroselectivity and minimal hemodynamic effects,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manjunatha, R., Pundarikaksha, H. P., Madhusudhana, H. R., Amarkumar, J., Hanumantharaju, B. K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4825428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27127315
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.178825
_version_ 1782426218234118144
author Manjunatha, R.
Pundarikaksha, H. P.
Madhusudhana, H. R.
Amarkumar, J.
Hanumantharaju, B. K.
author_facet Manjunatha, R.
Pundarikaksha, H. P.
Madhusudhana, H. R.
Amarkumar, J.
Hanumantharaju, B. K.
author_sort Manjunatha, R.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common and progressive disease affecting elderly males, often associated with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). α1-blockers are the mainstay in symptomatic therapy of BPH. Because of their greater uroselectivity and minimal hemodynamic effects, alfuzosin, tamsulosin, and silodosin are generally preferred. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of alfuzosin, tamsulosin, and silodosin in patients with BPH and LUTS. METHODS: Ninety subjects with BPH and LUTS were randomized into three groups of thirty in each, to receive alfuzosin sustained release (SR) 10 mg, tamsulosin 0.4 mg, or silodosin 8 mg for 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure was a change in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and the secondary outcome measures were changes in individual subjective symptom scores, quality of life score (QLS), and peak flow rate (Qmax) from baseline. The treatment response was monitored at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. RESULTS: IPSS improved by 88.18%, 72.12%, and 82.23% in alfuzosin SR, tamsulosin and silodosin groups (P < 0.001) at 12 weeks. Improvement in QLS was >75% in all the three groups (P < 0.001). A significant improvement in Qmax was seen with alfuzosin and tamsulosin (P = 0.025 and P < 0.001) but not with silodosin (P = 0.153). However, the intergroup differences in IPSS, QLS, and Qmax were not significant. Ejaculatory dysfunction was more common with silodosin and corrected QT (QTc) prolongation occurred only with alfuzosin (two subjects) and tamsulosin (three subjects). CONCLUSION: Alfuzosin, tamsulosin, and silodosin showed similar efficacy in improvement of LUTS secondary to BPH, with good tolerability, acceptability, and minimum hemodynamic adverse effects. Alfuzosin, tamsulosin, and silodosin are comparable in efficacy in symptomatic management of BPH. The occurrence of QTc prolongation in three subjects with tamsulosin in the present study is an unexpected adverse event as there are no reports of QTc prolongation with tamsulosin in any of the previous studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4825428
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48254282016-04-28 A randomized, comparative, open-label study of efficacy and tolerability of alfuzosin, tamsulosin and silodosin in benign prostatic hyperplasia Manjunatha, R. Pundarikaksha, H. P. Madhusudhana, H. R. Amarkumar, J. Hanumantharaju, B. K. Indian J Pharmacol Research Article OBJECTIVES: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common and progressive disease affecting elderly males, often associated with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). α1-blockers are the mainstay in symptomatic therapy of BPH. Because of their greater uroselectivity and minimal hemodynamic effects, alfuzosin, tamsulosin, and silodosin are generally preferred. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of alfuzosin, tamsulosin, and silodosin in patients with BPH and LUTS. METHODS: Ninety subjects with BPH and LUTS were randomized into three groups of thirty in each, to receive alfuzosin sustained release (SR) 10 mg, tamsulosin 0.4 mg, or silodosin 8 mg for 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure was a change in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and the secondary outcome measures were changes in individual subjective symptom scores, quality of life score (QLS), and peak flow rate (Qmax) from baseline. The treatment response was monitored at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. RESULTS: IPSS improved by 88.18%, 72.12%, and 82.23% in alfuzosin SR, tamsulosin and silodosin groups (P < 0.001) at 12 weeks. Improvement in QLS was >75% in all the three groups (P < 0.001). A significant improvement in Qmax was seen with alfuzosin and tamsulosin (P = 0.025 and P < 0.001) but not with silodosin (P = 0.153). However, the intergroup differences in IPSS, QLS, and Qmax were not significant. Ejaculatory dysfunction was more common with silodosin and corrected QT (QTc) prolongation occurred only with alfuzosin (two subjects) and tamsulosin (three subjects). CONCLUSION: Alfuzosin, tamsulosin, and silodosin showed similar efficacy in improvement of LUTS secondary to BPH, with good tolerability, acceptability, and minimum hemodynamic adverse effects. Alfuzosin, tamsulosin, and silodosin are comparable in efficacy in symptomatic management of BPH. The occurrence of QTc prolongation in three subjects with tamsulosin in the present study is an unexpected adverse event as there are no reports of QTc prolongation with tamsulosin in any of the previous studies. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4825428/ /pubmed/27127315 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.178825 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Research Article
Manjunatha, R.
Pundarikaksha, H. P.
Madhusudhana, H. R.
Amarkumar, J.
Hanumantharaju, B. K.
A randomized, comparative, open-label study of efficacy and tolerability of alfuzosin, tamsulosin and silodosin in benign prostatic hyperplasia
title A randomized, comparative, open-label study of efficacy and tolerability of alfuzosin, tamsulosin and silodosin in benign prostatic hyperplasia
title_full A randomized, comparative, open-label study of efficacy and tolerability of alfuzosin, tamsulosin and silodosin in benign prostatic hyperplasia
title_fullStr A randomized, comparative, open-label study of efficacy and tolerability of alfuzosin, tamsulosin and silodosin in benign prostatic hyperplasia
title_full_unstemmed A randomized, comparative, open-label study of efficacy and tolerability of alfuzosin, tamsulosin and silodosin in benign prostatic hyperplasia
title_short A randomized, comparative, open-label study of efficacy and tolerability of alfuzosin, tamsulosin and silodosin in benign prostatic hyperplasia
title_sort randomized, comparative, open-label study of efficacy and tolerability of alfuzosin, tamsulosin and silodosin in benign prostatic hyperplasia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4825428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27127315
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.178825
work_keys_str_mv AT manjunathar arandomizedcomparativeopenlabelstudyofefficacyandtolerabilityofalfuzosintamsulosinandsilodosininbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT pundarikakshahp arandomizedcomparativeopenlabelstudyofefficacyandtolerabilityofalfuzosintamsulosinandsilodosininbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT madhusudhanahr arandomizedcomparativeopenlabelstudyofefficacyandtolerabilityofalfuzosintamsulosinandsilodosininbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT amarkumarj arandomizedcomparativeopenlabelstudyofefficacyandtolerabilityofalfuzosintamsulosinandsilodosininbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT hanumantharajubk arandomizedcomparativeopenlabelstudyofefficacyandtolerabilityofalfuzosintamsulosinandsilodosininbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT manjunathar randomizedcomparativeopenlabelstudyofefficacyandtolerabilityofalfuzosintamsulosinandsilodosininbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT pundarikakshahp randomizedcomparativeopenlabelstudyofefficacyandtolerabilityofalfuzosintamsulosinandsilodosininbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT madhusudhanahr randomizedcomparativeopenlabelstudyofefficacyandtolerabilityofalfuzosintamsulosinandsilodosininbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT amarkumarj randomizedcomparativeopenlabelstudyofefficacyandtolerabilityofalfuzosintamsulosinandsilodosininbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT hanumantharajubk randomizedcomparativeopenlabelstudyofefficacyandtolerabilityofalfuzosintamsulosinandsilodosininbenignprostatichyperplasia