Cargando…

Can Single Incision Laproscopic Cholecystectomy Replace the Traditional Four Port Laproscopic Approach: A Review

The major aim of surgeons has always been a minimalist approach towards surgery, thereby reducing the complications associated with the surgery. The gold standard treatment for cholelithiasis with cholecystitis is currently the four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (4 PLC). Recently, a newer techni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmed, Muhammad Umer, Aftab, Azib, Seriwala, Haseeb Munaf, Khan, Ali Mahmood, Anis, Khurram, Ahmed, Iqbal, Rehman, Shafiq Ur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Canadian Center of Science and Education 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4825526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25363123
http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v6n6p119
_version_ 1782426241083637760
author Ahmed, Muhammad Umer
Aftab, Azib
Seriwala, Haseeb Munaf
Khan, Ali Mahmood
Anis, Khurram
Ahmed, Iqbal
Rehman, Shafiq Ur
author_facet Ahmed, Muhammad Umer
Aftab, Azib
Seriwala, Haseeb Munaf
Khan, Ali Mahmood
Anis, Khurram
Ahmed, Iqbal
Rehman, Shafiq Ur
author_sort Ahmed, Muhammad Umer
collection PubMed
description The major aim of surgeons has always been a minimalist approach towards surgery, thereby reducing the complications associated with the surgery. The gold standard treatment for cholelithiasis with cholecystitis is currently the four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (4 PLC). Recently, a newer technique has been introduced which uses a single port, rather than the four ports, for the removal of the gall bladder laparoscopically; it is known as Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC). This is a comparatively minimal approach towards surgery. Therefore the purpose of this review is to compare the advantages and the disadvantages of SILC versus 4PLC, and hence, to give an idea of whether SILC is ready to replace the traditional approach as the new treatment of choice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4825526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Canadian Center of Science and Education
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48255262016-04-21 Can Single Incision Laproscopic Cholecystectomy Replace the Traditional Four Port Laproscopic Approach: A Review Ahmed, Muhammad Umer Aftab, Azib Seriwala, Haseeb Munaf Khan, Ali Mahmood Anis, Khurram Ahmed, Iqbal Rehman, Shafiq Ur Glob J Health Sci Articles The major aim of surgeons has always been a minimalist approach towards surgery, thereby reducing the complications associated with the surgery. The gold standard treatment for cholelithiasis with cholecystitis is currently the four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (4 PLC). Recently, a newer technique has been introduced which uses a single port, rather than the four ports, for the removal of the gall bladder laparoscopically; it is known as Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC). This is a comparatively minimal approach towards surgery. Therefore the purpose of this review is to compare the advantages and the disadvantages of SILC versus 4PLC, and hence, to give an idea of whether SILC is ready to replace the traditional approach as the new treatment of choice. Canadian Center of Science and Education 2014-11 2014-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4825526/ /pubmed/25363123 http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v6n6p119 Text en Copyright: © Canadian Center of Science and Education http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Ahmed, Muhammad Umer
Aftab, Azib
Seriwala, Haseeb Munaf
Khan, Ali Mahmood
Anis, Khurram
Ahmed, Iqbal
Rehman, Shafiq Ur
Can Single Incision Laproscopic Cholecystectomy Replace the Traditional Four Port Laproscopic Approach: A Review
title Can Single Incision Laproscopic Cholecystectomy Replace the Traditional Four Port Laproscopic Approach: A Review
title_full Can Single Incision Laproscopic Cholecystectomy Replace the Traditional Four Port Laproscopic Approach: A Review
title_fullStr Can Single Incision Laproscopic Cholecystectomy Replace the Traditional Four Port Laproscopic Approach: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Can Single Incision Laproscopic Cholecystectomy Replace the Traditional Four Port Laproscopic Approach: A Review
title_short Can Single Incision Laproscopic Cholecystectomy Replace the Traditional Four Port Laproscopic Approach: A Review
title_sort can single incision laproscopic cholecystectomy replace the traditional four port laproscopic approach: a review
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4825526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25363123
http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v6n6p119
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedmuhammadumer cansingleincisionlaproscopiccholecystectomyreplacethetraditionalfourportlaproscopicapproachareview
AT aftabazib cansingleincisionlaproscopiccholecystectomyreplacethetraditionalfourportlaproscopicapproachareview
AT seriwalahaseebmunaf cansingleincisionlaproscopiccholecystectomyreplacethetraditionalfourportlaproscopicapproachareview
AT khanalimahmood cansingleincisionlaproscopiccholecystectomyreplacethetraditionalfourportlaproscopicapproachareview
AT aniskhurram cansingleincisionlaproscopiccholecystectomyreplacethetraditionalfourportlaproscopicapproachareview
AT ahmediqbal cansingleincisionlaproscopiccholecystectomyreplacethetraditionalfourportlaproscopicapproachareview
AT rehmanshafiqur cansingleincisionlaproscopiccholecystectomyreplacethetraditionalfourportlaproscopicapproachareview