Cargando…
Conversion to eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy: A pooled analysis of 2 phase III studies
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) monotherapy. METHODS: This post hoc pooled analysis of 2 randomized double-blind studies (093-045 and -046) included adults with partial-onset seizures medically uncontrolled by 1 or 2 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Following...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4826334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26911639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002497 |
_version_ | 1782426321904730112 |
---|---|
author | Sperling, Michael R. French, Jacqueline Jacobson, Mercedes P. Pazdera, Ladislav Gough, Mallory Cheng, Hailong Grinnell, Todd Blum, David |
author_facet | Sperling, Michael R. French, Jacqueline Jacobson, Mercedes P. Pazdera, Ladislav Gough, Mallory Cheng, Hailong Grinnell, Todd Blum, David |
author_sort | Sperling, Michael R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) monotherapy. METHODS: This post hoc pooled analysis of 2 randomized double-blind studies (093-045 and -046) included adults with partial-onset seizures medically uncontrolled by 1 or 2 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Following the baseline period (8 weeks), eligible patients were randomized 2:1 to receive ESL 1,600 mg or 1,200 mg once daily for 18 weeks; the primary endpoint was study exit by meeting predefined exit criteria (signifying worsening seizure control). In each study, treatment was considered effective if the upper 95% confidence limit for exit rate was lower than the historical control threshold (65.3%). RESULTS: Pooled exit rates were as follows: ESL 1,600 mg = 20.6% (95% confidence interval: 15.6%–26.8%); ESL 1,200 mg = 30.8% (23.0%–40.5%). Use of 2 baseline AEDs or rescue medication, US location, epilepsy duration ≥20 years, and higher maximum baseline seizure frequency were associated with higher exit risks. Median percent reductions in standardized seizure frequency between baseline and the 18-week double-blind period were as follows: ESL 1,600 mg = 43.2%; ESL 1,200 mg = 35.7%; baseline carbamazepine use was associated with smaller reductions. Safety profiles were similar between ESL doses. CONCLUSIONS: Exit rates for ESL monotherapy (1,600 mg and 1,200 mg once daily) were lower than the historical control threshold, irrespective of baseline AED use and region, with no additional safety concerns identified. Clinical factors and location clearly influence treatment responses in conversion-to-monotherapy trials. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This pooled analysis provides Class IV evidence that for adults with medically uncontrolled partial-onset seizures, ESL monotherapy is well tolerated and effective. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4826334 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48263342016-04-21 Conversion to eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy: A pooled analysis of 2 phase III studies Sperling, Michael R. French, Jacqueline Jacobson, Mercedes P. Pazdera, Ladislav Gough, Mallory Cheng, Hailong Grinnell, Todd Blum, David Neurology Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) monotherapy. METHODS: This post hoc pooled analysis of 2 randomized double-blind studies (093-045 and -046) included adults with partial-onset seizures medically uncontrolled by 1 or 2 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Following the baseline period (8 weeks), eligible patients were randomized 2:1 to receive ESL 1,600 mg or 1,200 mg once daily for 18 weeks; the primary endpoint was study exit by meeting predefined exit criteria (signifying worsening seizure control). In each study, treatment was considered effective if the upper 95% confidence limit for exit rate was lower than the historical control threshold (65.3%). RESULTS: Pooled exit rates were as follows: ESL 1,600 mg = 20.6% (95% confidence interval: 15.6%–26.8%); ESL 1,200 mg = 30.8% (23.0%–40.5%). Use of 2 baseline AEDs or rescue medication, US location, epilepsy duration ≥20 years, and higher maximum baseline seizure frequency were associated with higher exit risks. Median percent reductions in standardized seizure frequency between baseline and the 18-week double-blind period were as follows: ESL 1,600 mg = 43.2%; ESL 1,200 mg = 35.7%; baseline carbamazepine use was associated with smaller reductions. Safety profiles were similar between ESL doses. CONCLUSIONS: Exit rates for ESL monotherapy (1,600 mg and 1,200 mg once daily) were lower than the historical control threshold, irrespective of baseline AED use and region, with no additional safety concerns identified. Clinical factors and location clearly influence treatment responses in conversion-to-monotherapy trials. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This pooled analysis provides Class IV evidence that for adults with medically uncontrolled partial-onset seizures, ESL monotherapy is well tolerated and effective. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4826334/ /pubmed/26911639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002497 Text en © 2016 American Academy of Neurology This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. |
spellingShingle | Article Sperling, Michael R. French, Jacqueline Jacobson, Mercedes P. Pazdera, Ladislav Gough, Mallory Cheng, Hailong Grinnell, Todd Blum, David Conversion to eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy: A pooled analysis of 2 phase III studies |
title | Conversion to eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy: A pooled analysis of 2 phase III studies |
title_full | Conversion to eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy: A pooled analysis of 2 phase III studies |
title_fullStr | Conversion to eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy: A pooled analysis of 2 phase III studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Conversion to eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy: A pooled analysis of 2 phase III studies |
title_short | Conversion to eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy: A pooled analysis of 2 phase III studies |
title_sort | conversion to eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy: a pooled analysis of 2 phase iii studies |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4826334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26911639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002497 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sperlingmichaelr conversiontoeslicarbazepineacetatemonotherapyapooledanalysisof2phaseiiistudies AT frenchjacqueline conversiontoeslicarbazepineacetatemonotherapyapooledanalysisof2phaseiiistudies AT jacobsonmercedesp conversiontoeslicarbazepineacetatemonotherapyapooledanalysisof2phaseiiistudies AT pazderaladislav conversiontoeslicarbazepineacetatemonotherapyapooledanalysisof2phaseiiistudies AT goughmallory conversiontoeslicarbazepineacetatemonotherapyapooledanalysisof2phaseiiistudies AT chenghailong conversiontoeslicarbazepineacetatemonotherapyapooledanalysisof2phaseiiistudies AT grinnelltodd conversiontoeslicarbazepineacetatemonotherapyapooledanalysisof2phaseiiistudies AT blumdavid conversiontoeslicarbazepineacetatemonotherapyapooledanalysisof2phaseiiistudies |