Cargando…

Are Nurses and Auxiliary Healthcare Workers Equally Effective in Delivering Smoking Cessation Support in Primary Care?

INTRODUCTION: Smoking cessation support is increasingly delivered in primary care by auxiliary healthcare workers in place of healthcare professionals. However, it is unknown whether this shift might affect the quality and impact of the support delivered. METHODS: Data from the iQuit in Practice ran...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faulkner, Kathryn, Sutton, Stephen, Jamison, James, Sloan, Melanie, Boase, Sue, Naughton, Felix
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4826488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26453668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntv206
_version_ 1782426339293265920
author Faulkner, Kathryn
Sutton, Stephen
Jamison, James
Sloan, Melanie
Boase, Sue
Naughton, Felix
author_facet Faulkner, Kathryn
Sutton, Stephen
Jamison, James
Sloan, Melanie
Boase, Sue
Naughton, Felix
author_sort Faulkner, Kathryn
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Smoking cessation support is increasingly delivered in primary care by auxiliary healthcare workers in place of healthcare professionals. However, it is unknown whether this shift might affect the quality and impact of the support delivered. METHODS: Data from the iQuit in Practice randomized control trial of cessation support in General Practice was used (N = 602). Analyses assessed whether cessation advisor type (nurse or healthcare assistant [HCA]) was associated with abstinence (primary outcome: self-reported 2-week point prevalence abstinence at 8 weeks follow-up), the advice delivered during the initial consultation, pharmacotherapies prescribed, patient satisfaction, initial consultation length, and the number and type of interim contacts. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in abstinence for support delivered by HCAs versus nurses at 8 weeks (HCAs 42.8%, nurses 42.6%; unadjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.73 to 1.40), or at 4 weeks or 6 months follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences in advice delivered, the types of pharmacotherapies prescribed or patient satisfaction. Compared with nurses, HCA consultations were longer on average (HCAs 23.6 minutes, nurses 20.8 minutes; P = .002) and they undertook more interim contacts (HCAs median 2, nurses median 1; P < .001), with contact more likely to be face-to-face than phone call (HCAs 91.2%, nurses 70.9%; OR = 4.23, 95% CI = 2.86 to 6.26). CONCLUSIONS: HCAs appear equally effective as nurses in supporting smoking cessation, although they do this with greater patient contact. Using auxiliary practitioners to deliver cessation support could free up nurse time and reduce costs. IMPLICATIONS: This study found that primary care patients receiving smoking cessation support from auxiliary healthcare workers were just as likely to be abstinent up to 6 months later as those patients seen by nurses. While the auxiliary healthcare workers achieved this with slightly increased patient contact time, the advice delivered, pharmacotherapies provided and patient satisfaction were similar to that of nurses. Expanding the auxiliary healthcare worker role to include smoking cessation support could increase role satisfaction and reduce the costs of cessation support delivery in primary care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4826488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48264882016-04-11 Are Nurses and Auxiliary Healthcare Workers Equally Effective in Delivering Smoking Cessation Support in Primary Care? Faulkner, Kathryn Sutton, Stephen Jamison, James Sloan, Melanie Boase, Sue Naughton, Felix Nicotine Tob Res Original Investigation INTRODUCTION: Smoking cessation support is increasingly delivered in primary care by auxiliary healthcare workers in place of healthcare professionals. However, it is unknown whether this shift might affect the quality and impact of the support delivered. METHODS: Data from the iQuit in Practice randomized control trial of cessation support in General Practice was used (N = 602). Analyses assessed whether cessation advisor type (nurse or healthcare assistant [HCA]) was associated with abstinence (primary outcome: self-reported 2-week point prevalence abstinence at 8 weeks follow-up), the advice delivered during the initial consultation, pharmacotherapies prescribed, patient satisfaction, initial consultation length, and the number and type of interim contacts. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in abstinence for support delivered by HCAs versus nurses at 8 weeks (HCAs 42.8%, nurses 42.6%; unadjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.73 to 1.40), or at 4 weeks or 6 months follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences in advice delivered, the types of pharmacotherapies prescribed or patient satisfaction. Compared with nurses, HCA consultations were longer on average (HCAs 23.6 minutes, nurses 20.8 minutes; P = .002) and they undertook more interim contacts (HCAs median 2, nurses median 1; P < .001), with contact more likely to be face-to-face than phone call (HCAs 91.2%, nurses 70.9%; OR = 4.23, 95% CI = 2.86 to 6.26). CONCLUSIONS: HCAs appear equally effective as nurses in supporting smoking cessation, although they do this with greater patient contact. Using auxiliary practitioners to deliver cessation support could free up nurse time and reduce costs. IMPLICATIONS: This study found that primary care patients receiving smoking cessation support from auxiliary healthcare workers were just as likely to be abstinent up to 6 months later as those patients seen by nurses. While the auxiliary healthcare workers achieved this with slightly increased patient contact time, the advice delivered, pharmacotherapies provided and patient satisfaction were similar to that of nurses. Expanding the auxiliary healthcare worker role to include smoking cessation support could increase role satisfaction and reduce the costs of cessation support delivery in primary care. Oxford University Press 2016-05 2015-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4826488/ /pubmed/26453668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntv206 Text en © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Faulkner, Kathryn
Sutton, Stephen
Jamison, James
Sloan, Melanie
Boase, Sue
Naughton, Felix
Are Nurses and Auxiliary Healthcare Workers Equally Effective in Delivering Smoking Cessation Support in Primary Care?
title Are Nurses and Auxiliary Healthcare Workers Equally Effective in Delivering Smoking Cessation Support in Primary Care?
title_full Are Nurses and Auxiliary Healthcare Workers Equally Effective in Delivering Smoking Cessation Support in Primary Care?
title_fullStr Are Nurses and Auxiliary Healthcare Workers Equally Effective in Delivering Smoking Cessation Support in Primary Care?
title_full_unstemmed Are Nurses and Auxiliary Healthcare Workers Equally Effective in Delivering Smoking Cessation Support in Primary Care?
title_short Are Nurses and Auxiliary Healthcare Workers Equally Effective in Delivering Smoking Cessation Support in Primary Care?
title_sort are nurses and auxiliary healthcare workers equally effective in delivering smoking cessation support in primary care?
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4826488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26453668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntv206
work_keys_str_mv AT faulknerkathryn arenursesandauxiliaryhealthcareworkersequallyeffectiveindeliveringsmokingcessationsupportinprimarycare
AT suttonstephen arenursesandauxiliaryhealthcareworkersequallyeffectiveindeliveringsmokingcessationsupportinprimarycare
AT jamisonjames arenursesandauxiliaryhealthcareworkersequallyeffectiveindeliveringsmokingcessationsupportinprimarycare
AT sloanmelanie arenursesandauxiliaryhealthcareworkersequallyeffectiveindeliveringsmokingcessationsupportinprimarycare
AT boasesue arenursesandauxiliaryhealthcareworkersequallyeffectiveindeliveringsmokingcessationsupportinprimarycare
AT naughtonfelix arenursesandauxiliaryhealthcareworkersequallyeffectiveindeliveringsmokingcessationsupportinprimarycare