Cargando…

Effect of hemoadsorption during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery – a blinded, randomized, controlled pilot study using a novel adsorbent

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery initiates a systemic inflammatory response, which is associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality. Hemoadsorption (HA) of cytokines may suppress inflammatory responses and improve outcomes. We tested a new sorbent used for HA (CytoSorb™; Cyto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bernardi, Martin H., Rinoesl, Harald, Dragosits, Klaus, Ristl, Robin, Hoffelner, Friedrich, Opfermann, Philipp, Lamm, Christian, Preißing, Falk, Wiedemann, Dominik, Hiesmayr, Michael J., Spittler, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4826492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27059056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1270-0
_version_ 1782426340211818496
author Bernardi, Martin H.
Rinoesl, Harald
Dragosits, Klaus
Ristl, Robin
Hoffelner, Friedrich
Opfermann, Philipp
Lamm, Christian
Preißing, Falk
Wiedemann, Dominik
Hiesmayr, Michael J.
Spittler, Andreas
author_facet Bernardi, Martin H.
Rinoesl, Harald
Dragosits, Klaus
Ristl, Robin
Hoffelner, Friedrich
Opfermann, Philipp
Lamm, Christian
Preißing, Falk
Wiedemann, Dominik
Hiesmayr, Michael J.
Spittler, Andreas
author_sort Bernardi, Martin H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery initiates a systemic inflammatory response, which is associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality. Hemoadsorption (HA) of cytokines may suppress inflammatory responses and improve outcomes. We tested a new sorbent used for HA (CytoSorb™; CytoSorbents Europe GmbH, Berlin, Germany) installed in the CPB circuit on changes of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines levels, inflammation markers, and differences in patients’ perioperative course. METHODS: In this first pilot trial, 37 blinded patients were undergoing elective CPB surgery at the Medical University of Vienna and were randomly assigned to HA (n = 19) or control group (n = 18). The primary outcome was differences of cytokine levels (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-18, TNF-α, and IL-10) within the first five postoperative days. We also analyzed whether we can observe any differences in ex vivo lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced TNF-α production, a reduction of high-mobility box group 1 (HMGB1), or other inflammatory markers. Additionally, measurements for fluid components, blood products, catecholamine treatment, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and 30-day mortality were analyzed. RESULTS: We did not find differences in our primary outcome immediately following the HA treatment, although we observed differences for IL-10 24 hours after CPB (HA: median 0.3, interquartile range (IQR) 0–4.5; control: not traceable, P = 0.0347) and 48 hours after CPB (median 0, IQR 0–1.2 versus not traceable, P = 0.0185). We did not find any differences for IL-6 between both groups, and other cytokines were rarely expressed. We found differences in pretreatment levels of HMGB1 (HA: median 0, IQR 0–28.1; control: median 48.6, IQR 12.7–597.3, P = 0.02083) but no significant changes to post-treatment levels. No differences in inflammatory markers, fluid administration, blood substitution, catecholamines, BIA, or 30-day mortality were found. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find any reduction of the pro-inflammatory response in our patients and therefore no changes in their perioperative course. However, IL-10 showed a longer-lasting anti-inflammatory effect. The clinical impact of prolonged IL-10 needs further evaluation. We also observed strong inter-individual differences in cytokine levels; therefore, patients with an exaggerated inflammatory response to CPB need to be identified. The implementation of HA during CPB was feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01879176, registration date: June 7, 2013.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4826492
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48264922016-04-10 Effect of hemoadsorption during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery – a blinded, randomized, controlled pilot study using a novel adsorbent Bernardi, Martin H. Rinoesl, Harald Dragosits, Klaus Ristl, Robin Hoffelner, Friedrich Opfermann, Philipp Lamm, Christian Preißing, Falk Wiedemann, Dominik Hiesmayr, Michael J. Spittler, Andreas Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery initiates a systemic inflammatory response, which is associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality. Hemoadsorption (HA) of cytokines may suppress inflammatory responses and improve outcomes. We tested a new sorbent used for HA (CytoSorb™; CytoSorbents Europe GmbH, Berlin, Germany) installed in the CPB circuit on changes of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines levels, inflammation markers, and differences in patients’ perioperative course. METHODS: In this first pilot trial, 37 blinded patients were undergoing elective CPB surgery at the Medical University of Vienna and were randomly assigned to HA (n = 19) or control group (n = 18). The primary outcome was differences of cytokine levels (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-18, TNF-α, and IL-10) within the first five postoperative days. We also analyzed whether we can observe any differences in ex vivo lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced TNF-α production, a reduction of high-mobility box group 1 (HMGB1), or other inflammatory markers. Additionally, measurements for fluid components, blood products, catecholamine treatment, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and 30-day mortality were analyzed. RESULTS: We did not find differences in our primary outcome immediately following the HA treatment, although we observed differences for IL-10 24 hours after CPB (HA: median 0.3, interquartile range (IQR) 0–4.5; control: not traceable, P = 0.0347) and 48 hours after CPB (median 0, IQR 0–1.2 versus not traceable, P = 0.0185). We did not find any differences for IL-6 between both groups, and other cytokines were rarely expressed. We found differences in pretreatment levels of HMGB1 (HA: median 0, IQR 0–28.1; control: median 48.6, IQR 12.7–597.3, P = 0.02083) but no significant changes to post-treatment levels. No differences in inflammatory markers, fluid administration, blood substitution, catecholamines, BIA, or 30-day mortality were found. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find any reduction of the pro-inflammatory response in our patients and therefore no changes in their perioperative course. However, IL-10 showed a longer-lasting anti-inflammatory effect. The clinical impact of prolonged IL-10 needs further evaluation. We also observed strong inter-individual differences in cytokine levels; therefore, patients with an exaggerated inflammatory response to CPB need to be identified. The implementation of HA during CPB was feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01879176, registration date: June 7, 2013. BioMed Central 2016-04-09 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4826492/ /pubmed/27059056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1270-0 Text en © Bernardi et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Bernardi, Martin H.
Rinoesl, Harald
Dragosits, Klaus
Ristl, Robin
Hoffelner, Friedrich
Opfermann, Philipp
Lamm, Christian
Preißing, Falk
Wiedemann, Dominik
Hiesmayr, Michael J.
Spittler, Andreas
Effect of hemoadsorption during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery – a blinded, randomized, controlled pilot study using a novel adsorbent
title Effect of hemoadsorption during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery – a blinded, randomized, controlled pilot study using a novel adsorbent
title_full Effect of hemoadsorption during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery – a blinded, randomized, controlled pilot study using a novel adsorbent
title_fullStr Effect of hemoadsorption during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery – a blinded, randomized, controlled pilot study using a novel adsorbent
title_full_unstemmed Effect of hemoadsorption during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery – a blinded, randomized, controlled pilot study using a novel adsorbent
title_short Effect of hemoadsorption during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery – a blinded, randomized, controlled pilot study using a novel adsorbent
title_sort effect of hemoadsorption during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery – a blinded, randomized, controlled pilot study using a novel adsorbent
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4826492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27059056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1270-0
work_keys_str_mv AT bernardimartinh effectofhemoadsorptionduringcardiopulmonarybypasssurgeryablindedrandomizedcontrolledpilotstudyusinganoveladsorbent
AT rinoeslharald effectofhemoadsorptionduringcardiopulmonarybypasssurgeryablindedrandomizedcontrolledpilotstudyusinganoveladsorbent
AT dragositsklaus effectofhemoadsorptionduringcardiopulmonarybypasssurgeryablindedrandomizedcontrolledpilotstudyusinganoveladsorbent
AT ristlrobin effectofhemoadsorptionduringcardiopulmonarybypasssurgeryablindedrandomizedcontrolledpilotstudyusinganoveladsorbent
AT hoffelnerfriedrich effectofhemoadsorptionduringcardiopulmonarybypasssurgeryablindedrandomizedcontrolledpilotstudyusinganoveladsorbent
AT opfermannphilipp effectofhemoadsorptionduringcardiopulmonarybypasssurgeryablindedrandomizedcontrolledpilotstudyusinganoveladsorbent
AT lammchristian effectofhemoadsorptionduringcardiopulmonarybypasssurgeryablindedrandomizedcontrolledpilotstudyusinganoveladsorbent
AT preißingfalk effectofhemoadsorptionduringcardiopulmonarybypasssurgeryablindedrandomizedcontrolledpilotstudyusinganoveladsorbent
AT wiedemanndominik effectofhemoadsorptionduringcardiopulmonarybypasssurgeryablindedrandomizedcontrolledpilotstudyusinganoveladsorbent
AT hiesmayrmichaelj effectofhemoadsorptionduringcardiopulmonarybypasssurgeryablindedrandomizedcontrolledpilotstudyusinganoveladsorbent
AT spittlerandreas effectofhemoadsorptionduringcardiopulmonarybypasssurgeryablindedrandomizedcontrolledpilotstudyusinganoveladsorbent