Cargando…

Outcomes of patients with loco-regionally recurrent or new primary squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck treated with curative intent reirradiation at Mayo Clinic

BACKGROUND: We reviewed outcomes of patients with loco-regionally recurrent (LRR) or new primary (NP) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) treated at our institution with reirradiation (RRT). METHODS: Patients received definitive RRT (DRRT) or post-operative RRT following salvage sur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Curtis, Kelly K., Ross, Helen J., Garrett, Ashley L., Jizba, Theresa A., Patel, Ajay B., Patel, Samir H., Wong, William W., Halyard, Michele Y., Ko, Stephen J., Kosiorek, Heidi E., Foote, Robert L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4826496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27061083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0630-x
_version_ 1782426341126176768
author Curtis, Kelly K.
Ross, Helen J.
Garrett, Ashley L.
Jizba, Theresa A.
Patel, Ajay B.
Patel, Samir H.
Wong, William W.
Halyard, Michele Y.
Ko, Stephen J.
Kosiorek, Heidi E.
Foote, Robert L.
author_facet Curtis, Kelly K.
Ross, Helen J.
Garrett, Ashley L.
Jizba, Theresa A.
Patel, Ajay B.
Patel, Samir H.
Wong, William W.
Halyard, Michele Y.
Ko, Stephen J.
Kosiorek, Heidi E.
Foote, Robert L.
author_sort Curtis, Kelly K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We reviewed outcomes of patients with loco-regionally recurrent (LRR) or new primary (NP) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) treated at our institution with reirradiation (RRT). METHODS: Patients received definitive RRT (DRRT) or post-operative RRT following salvage surgery (PRRT) from 2003 to 2011. Measured survival outcomes included loco-regional relapse free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Among 81 patients (PRRT, 42; DRRT, 39), median PRRT and DRRT doses were 60 Gy (12–70 Gy) and 69.6 Gy (48–76.8 Gy). The majority of patients received IMRT-based RRT (n = 77, 95 %). With median follow-up of 78.1 months (95 % CI, 56–96.8 months), 2-year OS was 53 % with PRRT and 48 % with DRRT (p = 0.12); 23 % of patients were alive at last follow-up. LRFS at 2 years was 60 %, and did not differ significantly between PRRT and DRRT groups. A trend toward inferior LRFS was noted among patients receiving chemotherapy with RRT versus RRT alone (p = 0.06). Late serious toxicities were uncommon, including osteoradionecrosis (2 patients) and carotid artery bleeding (1 patient, non-fatal). CONCLUSIONS: OS of PRRT- and DRRT-treated patients in this series appears superior to the published literature. We used IMRT for the majority of patients, in contrast to several series and trials previously reported, which may account in part for this difference. Future studies should seek to improve outcomes among patients with LRR/NP SCCHN via alternative therapeutic modalities such as proton radiotherapy and by incorporating novel systemic agents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4826496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48264962016-04-10 Outcomes of patients with loco-regionally recurrent or new primary squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck treated with curative intent reirradiation at Mayo Clinic Curtis, Kelly K. Ross, Helen J. Garrett, Ashley L. Jizba, Theresa A. Patel, Ajay B. Patel, Samir H. Wong, William W. Halyard, Michele Y. Ko, Stephen J. Kosiorek, Heidi E. Foote, Robert L. Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: We reviewed outcomes of patients with loco-regionally recurrent (LRR) or new primary (NP) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) treated at our institution with reirradiation (RRT). METHODS: Patients received definitive RRT (DRRT) or post-operative RRT following salvage surgery (PRRT) from 2003 to 2011. Measured survival outcomes included loco-regional relapse free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Among 81 patients (PRRT, 42; DRRT, 39), median PRRT and DRRT doses were 60 Gy (12–70 Gy) and 69.6 Gy (48–76.8 Gy). The majority of patients received IMRT-based RRT (n = 77, 95 %). With median follow-up of 78.1 months (95 % CI, 56–96.8 months), 2-year OS was 53 % with PRRT and 48 % with DRRT (p = 0.12); 23 % of patients were alive at last follow-up. LRFS at 2 years was 60 %, and did not differ significantly between PRRT and DRRT groups. A trend toward inferior LRFS was noted among patients receiving chemotherapy with RRT versus RRT alone (p = 0.06). Late serious toxicities were uncommon, including osteoradionecrosis (2 patients) and carotid artery bleeding (1 patient, non-fatal). CONCLUSIONS: OS of PRRT- and DRRT-treated patients in this series appears superior to the published literature. We used IMRT for the majority of patients, in contrast to several series and trials previously reported, which may account in part for this difference. Future studies should seek to improve outcomes among patients with LRR/NP SCCHN via alternative therapeutic modalities such as proton radiotherapy and by incorporating novel systemic agents. BioMed Central 2016-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4826496/ /pubmed/27061083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0630-x Text en © Curtis et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Curtis, Kelly K.
Ross, Helen J.
Garrett, Ashley L.
Jizba, Theresa A.
Patel, Ajay B.
Patel, Samir H.
Wong, William W.
Halyard, Michele Y.
Ko, Stephen J.
Kosiorek, Heidi E.
Foote, Robert L.
Outcomes of patients with loco-regionally recurrent or new primary squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck treated with curative intent reirradiation at Mayo Clinic
title Outcomes of patients with loco-regionally recurrent or new primary squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck treated with curative intent reirradiation at Mayo Clinic
title_full Outcomes of patients with loco-regionally recurrent or new primary squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck treated with curative intent reirradiation at Mayo Clinic
title_fullStr Outcomes of patients with loco-regionally recurrent or new primary squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck treated with curative intent reirradiation at Mayo Clinic
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of patients with loco-regionally recurrent or new primary squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck treated with curative intent reirradiation at Mayo Clinic
title_short Outcomes of patients with loco-regionally recurrent or new primary squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck treated with curative intent reirradiation at Mayo Clinic
title_sort outcomes of patients with loco-regionally recurrent or new primary squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck treated with curative intent reirradiation at mayo clinic
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4826496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27061083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0630-x
work_keys_str_mv AT curtiskellyk outcomesofpatientswithlocoregionallyrecurrentornewprimarysquamouscellcarcinomasoftheheadandnecktreatedwithcurativeintentreirradiationatmayoclinic
AT rosshelenj outcomesofpatientswithlocoregionallyrecurrentornewprimarysquamouscellcarcinomasoftheheadandnecktreatedwithcurativeintentreirradiationatmayoclinic
AT garrettashleyl outcomesofpatientswithlocoregionallyrecurrentornewprimarysquamouscellcarcinomasoftheheadandnecktreatedwithcurativeintentreirradiationatmayoclinic
AT jizbatheresaa outcomesofpatientswithlocoregionallyrecurrentornewprimarysquamouscellcarcinomasoftheheadandnecktreatedwithcurativeintentreirradiationatmayoclinic
AT patelajayb outcomesofpatientswithlocoregionallyrecurrentornewprimarysquamouscellcarcinomasoftheheadandnecktreatedwithcurativeintentreirradiationatmayoclinic
AT patelsamirh outcomesofpatientswithlocoregionallyrecurrentornewprimarysquamouscellcarcinomasoftheheadandnecktreatedwithcurativeintentreirradiationatmayoclinic
AT wongwilliamw outcomesofpatientswithlocoregionallyrecurrentornewprimarysquamouscellcarcinomasoftheheadandnecktreatedwithcurativeintentreirradiationatmayoclinic
AT halyardmicheley outcomesofpatientswithlocoregionallyrecurrentornewprimarysquamouscellcarcinomasoftheheadandnecktreatedwithcurativeintentreirradiationatmayoclinic
AT kostephenj outcomesofpatientswithlocoregionallyrecurrentornewprimarysquamouscellcarcinomasoftheheadandnecktreatedwithcurativeintentreirradiationatmayoclinic
AT kosiorekheidie outcomesofpatientswithlocoregionallyrecurrentornewprimarysquamouscellcarcinomasoftheheadandnecktreatedwithcurativeintentreirradiationatmayoclinic
AT footerobertl outcomesofpatientswithlocoregionallyrecurrentornewprimarysquamouscellcarcinomasoftheheadandnecktreatedwithcurativeintentreirradiationatmayoclinic