Cargando…
Applying Rasch analysis to evaluate measurement equivalence of different administration formats of the Activity Limitation scale of the Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review (CAMPHOR)
BACKGROUND: Electronic formats of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are now routinely used in clinical research studies. When changing from a validated paper and pen to electronic administration it is necessary to establish their equivalence. This study reports on the value of Rasch analysis i...
Autores principales: | Twiss, J., McKenna, S. P., Graham, J., Swetz, K., Sloan, J., Gomberg-Maitland, M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4826528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27062133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0462-2 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Portuguese validation of the Cambridge pulmonary hypertension outcome review (CAMPHOR) questionnaire
por: Reis, Abílio, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
The German adaptation of the Cambridge pulmonary hypertension outcome review (CAMPHOR)
por: Cima, Katharina, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Adaptation and validation of the Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review (CAMPHOR) for the Netherlands
por: Wapenaar, M., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Correction to: Adaptation and validation of the Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review (CAMPHOR) for the Netherlands
por: Wapenaar, M., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION OF THE CAMBRIDGE PULMONARY HYPERTENSION OUTCOME REVIEW (CAMPHOR) FOR CROATIA
por: Hećimović, Ana, et al.
Publicado: (2019)