Cargando…
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Current Clinical Opinions and Anesthesiologists Perspective
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), a minimally invasive method for removal of renal calculi, was initially started in the 1950s but gained popularity about two decades later and has now become standard practice for management. There has been an immense improvement in technique and various guidelin...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4826713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27110239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9036872 |
_version_ | 1782426370875326464 |
---|---|
author | Malik, Indira Wadhwa, Rachna |
author_facet | Malik, Indira Wadhwa, Rachna |
author_sort | Malik, Indira |
collection | PubMed |
description | Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), a minimally invasive method for removal of renal calculi, was initially started in the 1950s but gained popularity about two decades later and has now become standard practice for management. There has been an immense improvement in technique and various guidelines have been established for treatment of renal stones. However, it has its own share of complications which can be attributed to surgical technique as well as anesthesia related complications. PubMed and Google search yielded more than 30 articles describing the different complications seen in this procedure, out of which 15 major articles were selected for writing this review. The aim of this review article is to describe the implications of the complications associated with PCNL related to the anesthesiologist. The anesthesiologist is as much responsible for the management of the patient perioperatively as the surgeon. Therefore, it is mandatory to be familiar with the various complications, some of which may be life threatening and he should be able to manage them efficiently. The paper also analyses the advantages and drawbacks of the available options in anesthesia, that is, general and regional, both of which are employed for PCNL. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4826713 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48267132016-04-24 Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Current Clinical Opinions and Anesthesiologists Perspective Malik, Indira Wadhwa, Rachna Anesthesiol Res Pract Review Article Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), a minimally invasive method for removal of renal calculi, was initially started in the 1950s but gained popularity about two decades later and has now become standard practice for management. There has been an immense improvement in technique and various guidelines have been established for treatment of renal stones. However, it has its own share of complications which can be attributed to surgical technique as well as anesthesia related complications. PubMed and Google search yielded more than 30 articles describing the different complications seen in this procedure, out of which 15 major articles were selected for writing this review. The aim of this review article is to describe the implications of the complications associated with PCNL related to the anesthesiologist. The anesthesiologist is as much responsible for the management of the patient perioperatively as the surgeon. Therefore, it is mandatory to be familiar with the various complications, some of which may be life threatening and he should be able to manage them efficiently. The paper also analyses the advantages and drawbacks of the available options in anesthesia, that is, general and regional, both of which are employed for PCNL. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4826713/ /pubmed/27110239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9036872 Text en Copyright © 2016 I. Malik and R. Wadhwa. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Malik, Indira Wadhwa, Rachna Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Current Clinical Opinions and Anesthesiologists Perspective |
title | Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Current Clinical Opinions and Anesthesiologists Perspective |
title_full | Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Current Clinical Opinions and Anesthesiologists Perspective |
title_fullStr | Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Current Clinical Opinions and Anesthesiologists Perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Current Clinical Opinions and Anesthesiologists Perspective |
title_short | Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Current Clinical Opinions and Anesthesiologists Perspective |
title_sort | percutaneous nephrolithotomy: current clinical opinions and anesthesiologists perspective |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4826713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27110239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9036872 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malikindira percutaneousnephrolithotomycurrentclinicalopinionsandanesthesiologistsperspective AT wadhwarachna percutaneousnephrolithotomycurrentclinicalopinionsandanesthesiologistsperspective |