Cargando…

Evaluation of Quality and Readability of Health Information Websites Identified through India's Major Search Engines

Background. The available health information on websites should be reliable and accurate in order to make informed decisions by community. This study was done to assess the quality and readability of health information websites on World Wide Web in India. Methods. This cross-sectional study was carr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raj, S., Sharma, V. L., Singh, A. J., Goel, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4826908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27119025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4815285
_version_ 1782426385293246464
author Raj, S.
Sharma, V. L.
Singh, A. J.
Goel, S.
author_facet Raj, S.
Sharma, V. L.
Singh, A. J.
Goel, S.
author_sort Raj, S.
collection PubMed
description Background. The available health information on websites should be reliable and accurate in order to make informed decisions by community. This study was done to assess the quality and readability of health information websites on World Wide Web in India. Methods. This cross-sectional study was carried out in June 2014. The key words “Health” and “Information” were used on search engines “Google” and “Yahoo.” Out of 50 websites (25 from each search engines), after exclusion, 32 websites were evaluated. LIDA tool was used to assess the quality whereas the readability was assessed using Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), and SMOG. Results. Forty percent of websites (n = 13) were sponsored by government. Health On the Net Code of Conduct (HONcode) certification was present on 50% (n = 16) of websites. The mean LIDA score (74.31) was average. Only 3 websites scored high on LIDA score. Only five had readability scores at recommended sixth-grade level. Conclusion. Most health information websites had average quality especially in terms of usability and reliability and were written at high readability levels. Efforts are needed to develop the health information websites which can help general population in informed decision making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4826908
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48269082016-04-26 Evaluation of Quality and Readability of Health Information Websites Identified through India's Major Search Engines Raj, S. Sharma, V. L. Singh, A. J. Goel, S. Adv Prev Med Research Article Background. The available health information on websites should be reliable and accurate in order to make informed decisions by community. This study was done to assess the quality and readability of health information websites on World Wide Web in India. Methods. This cross-sectional study was carried out in June 2014. The key words “Health” and “Information” were used on search engines “Google” and “Yahoo.” Out of 50 websites (25 from each search engines), after exclusion, 32 websites were evaluated. LIDA tool was used to assess the quality whereas the readability was assessed using Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), and SMOG. Results. Forty percent of websites (n = 13) were sponsored by government. Health On the Net Code of Conduct (HONcode) certification was present on 50% (n = 16) of websites. The mean LIDA score (74.31) was average. Only 3 websites scored high on LIDA score. Only five had readability scores at recommended sixth-grade level. Conclusion. Most health information websites had average quality especially in terms of usability and reliability and were written at high readability levels. Efforts are needed to develop the health information websites which can help general population in informed decision making. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4826908/ /pubmed/27119025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4815285 Text en Copyright © 2016 S. Raj et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Raj, S.
Sharma, V. L.
Singh, A. J.
Goel, S.
Evaluation of Quality and Readability of Health Information Websites Identified through India's Major Search Engines
title Evaluation of Quality and Readability of Health Information Websites Identified through India's Major Search Engines
title_full Evaluation of Quality and Readability of Health Information Websites Identified through India's Major Search Engines
title_fullStr Evaluation of Quality and Readability of Health Information Websites Identified through India's Major Search Engines
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Quality and Readability of Health Information Websites Identified through India's Major Search Engines
title_short Evaluation of Quality and Readability of Health Information Websites Identified through India's Major Search Engines
title_sort evaluation of quality and readability of health information websites identified through india's major search engines
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4826908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27119025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4815285
work_keys_str_mv AT rajs evaluationofqualityandreadabilityofhealthinformationwebsitesidentifiedthroughindiasmajorsearchengines
AT sharmavl evaluationofqualityandreadabilityofhealthinformationwebsitesidentifiedthroughindiasmajorsearchengines
AT singhaj evaluationofqualityandreadabilityofhealthinformationwebsitesidentifiedthroughindiasmajorsearchengines
AT goels evaluationofqualityandreadabilityofhealthinformationwebsitesidentifiedthroughindiasmajorsearchengines