Cargando…

Validity of breast-specific gamma imaging for Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 4 lesions on mammography and/or ultrasound

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 lesions on mammography and/or ultrasound. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 162 patients who underwent BSGI in BI-RADS 4 lesions on mammogra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cho, Min Jeng, Yang, Jung-Hyun, Yu, Yeong Beom, Park, Kyoung Sik, Chung, Hyun Woo, So, Young, Choi, Nami, Kim, Mi Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Surgical Society 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4826981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27073789
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2016.90.4.194
_version_ 1782426398179196928
author Cho, Min Jeng
Yang, Jung-Hyun
Yu, Yeong Beom
Park, Kyoung Sik
Chung, Hyun Woo
So, Young
Choi, Nami
Kim, Mi Young
author_facet Cho, Min Jeng
Yang, Jung-Hyun
Yu, Yeong Beom
Park, Kyoung Sik
Chung, Hyun Woo
So, Young
Choi, Nami
Kim, Mi Young
author_sort Cho, Min Jeng
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 lesions on mammography and/or ultrasound. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 162 patients who underwent BSGI in BI-RADS 4 lesions on mammography and/or ultrasound. RESULTS: Of the 162 breast lesions, 66 were malignant tumors and 96 were benign tumors. Sensitivity and specificity of BSGI were 90.9% and 78.1%, and positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 74.1% and 92.6%. The sensitivity or specificity of mammography and ultrasound were 74.2% and 56.3% and 87.9% and 19.8%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of BSGI for breast lesions ≤1 cm were 88.0% and 86.8%, while the values of beast lesions >1 cm were 92.7% and 61.5%. The sensitivity or specificity of BSGI and mammography for patients with dense breasts were 92.0% and 81.3% and 72.0% and 50.0%, respectively. 26 patients showed neither a nodule nor microcalcification on ultrasound, but showed suspicious calcification on mammography. The sensitivity and specificity of BSGI with microcalcification only lesion were 75.0% and 94.4%. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that BSGI had shown high sensitivity and specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values in BI-RADS 4 lesions on ultrasound and/or mammography. BSGI showed excellent results in dense breasts, in lesions that are less than 1 cm in size and lesions with suspicious microcalcification only.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4826981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Surgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48269812016-04-12 Validity of breast-specific gamma imaging for Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 4 lesions on mammography and/or ultrasound Cho, Min Jeng Yang, Jung-Hyun Yu, Yeong Beom Park, Kyoung Sik Chung, Hyun Woo So, Young Choi, Nami Kim, Mi Young Ann Surg Treat Res Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 lesions on mammography and/or ultrasound. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 162 patients who underwent BSGI in BI-RADS 4 lesions on mammography and/or ultrasound. RESULTS: Of the 162 breast lesions, 66 were malignant tumors and 96 were benign tumors. Sensitivity and specificity of BSGI were 90.9% and 78.1%, and positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 74.1% and 92.6%. The sensitivity or specificity of mammography and ultrasound were 74.2% and 56.3% and 87.9% and 19.8%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of BSGI for breast lesions ≤1 cm were 88.0% and 86.8%, while the values of beast lesions >1 cm were 92.7% and 61.5%. The sensitivity or specificity of BSGI and mammography for patients with dense breasts were 92.0% and 81.3% and 72.0% and 50.0%, respectively. 26 patients showed neither a nodule nor microcalcification on ultrasound, but showed suspicious calcification on mammography. The sensitivity and specificity of BSGI with microcalcification only lesion were 75.0% and 94.4%. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that BSGI had shown high sensitivity and specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values in BI-RADS 4 lesions on ultrasound and/or mammography. BSGI showed excellent results in dense breasts, in lesions that are less than 1 cm in size and lesions with suspicious microcalcification only. The Korean Surgical Society 2016-04 2016-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4826981/ /pubmed/27073789 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2016.90.4.194 Text en Copyright © 2016, the Korean Surgical Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research is an Open Access Journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Cho, Min Jeng
Yang, Jung-Hyun
Yu, Yeong Beom
Park, Kyoung Sik
Chung, Hyun Woo
So, Young
Choi, Nami
Kim, Mi Young
Validity of breast-specific gamma imaging for Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 4 lesions on mammography and/or ultrasound
title Validity of breast-specific gamma imaging for Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 4 lesions on mammography and/or ultrasound
title_full Validity of breast-specific gamma imaging for Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 4 lesions on mammography and/or ultrasound
title_fullStr Validity of breast-specific gamma imaging for Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 4 lesions on mammography and/or ultrasound
title_full_unstemmed Validity of breast-specific gamma imaging for Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 4 lesions on mammography and/or ultrasound
title_short Validity of breast-specific gamma imaging for Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 4 lesions on mammography and/or ultrasound
title_sort validity of breast-specific gamma imaging for breast imaging reporting and data system 4 lesions on mammography and/or ultrasound
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4826981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27073789
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2016.90.4.194
work_keys_str_mv AT chominjeng validityofbreastspecificgammaimagingforbreastimagingreportinganddatasystem4lesionsonmammographyandorultrasound
AT yangjunghyun validityofbreastspecificgammaimagingforbreastimagingreportinganddatasystem4lesionsonmammographyandorultrasound
AT yuyeongbeom validityofbreastspecificgammaimagingforbreastimagingreportinganddatasystem4lesionsonmammographyandorultrasound
AT parkkyoungsik validityofbreastspecificgammaimagingforbreastimagingreportinganddatasystem4lesionsonmammographyandorultrasound
AT chunghyunwoo validityofbreastspecificgammaimagingforbreastimagingreportinganddatasystem4lesionsonmammographyandorultrasound
AT soyoung validityofbreastspecificgammaimagingforbreastimagingreportinganddatasystem4lesionsonmammographyandorultrasound
AT choinami validityofbreastspecificgammaimagingforbreastimagingreportinganddatasystem4lesionsonmammographyandorultrasound
AT kimmiyoung validityofbreastspecificgammaimagingforbreastimagingreportinganddatasystem4lesionsonmammographyandorultrasound