Cargando…

Are health care inequalities unfair? A study on public attitudes in 23 countries

BACKGROUND: In this article we focus on the following aims: (1) to analyze national and welfare state variations in the public perception of income-related health care inequalities, (2) to analyze associations of sociodemographic, socioeconomic, health-related, and health care factors with the perce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: von dem Knesebeck, Olaf, Vonneilich, Nico, Kim, Tae Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4827239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27067864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0350-8
_version_ 1782426446457733120
author von dem Knesebeck, Olaf
Vonneilich, Nico
Kim, Tae Jun
author_facet von dem Knesebeck, Olaf
Vonneilich, Nico
Kim, Tae Jun
author_sort von dem Knesebeck, Olaf
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In this article we focus on the following aims: (1) to analyze national and welfare state variations in the public perception of income-related health care inequalities, (2) to analyze associations of sociodemographic, socioeconomic, health-related, and health care factors with the perception of health care inequalities. METHODS: Data were taken from the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP), an annually repeated cross-sectional survey based on nationally representative samples. 23 countries (N = 37,228) were included and assigned to six welfare states. Attitude towards income-related health care inequalities was assessed by asking: “Is it fair or unfair that people with higher incomes can afford better health care than people with lower incomes?” with response categories ranging from “very fair” (1) to “very unfair” (5). On the individual level, sociodemographic (gender, age), socioeconomic (income, education) health-related (self-rated health), and health care factors (health insurance coverage, financial barriers to health care) were introduced. RESULTS: About two-thirds of the respondents in all countries think that it is unfair when people with higher incomes can afford better health care than people with lower incomes. Percentages vary between 42.8 in Taiwan and 84 in Slovenia. In terms of welfare states, this proportion is higher in Conservative, South European, and East European regimes than in East Asian, Liberal, and Social-Democratic regimes. Multilevel logistic regression analyses show that women, people affected by a low socioeconomic status, poor health, insufficient insurance coverage, and foregone care are more likely to perceive income-related health care inequalities as unfair. CONCLUSIONS: In most countries a majority of the population perceives income-related health care inequalities as unfair. Large differences between countries were observed. Welfare regime classification is important for explaining the variation across countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4827239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48272392016-04-12 Are health care inequalities unfair? A study on public attitudes in 23 countries von dem Knesebeck, Olaf Vonneilich, Nico Kim, Tae Jun Int J Equity Health Research BACKGROUND: In this article we focus on the following aims: (1) to analyze national and welfare state variations in the public perception of income-related health care inequalities, (2) to analyze associations of sociodemographic, socioeconomic, health-related, and health care factors with the perception of health care inequalities. METHODS: Data were taken from the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP), an annually repeated cross-sectional survey based on nationally representative samples. 23 countries (N = 37,228) were included and assigned to six welfare states. Attitude towards income-related health care inequalities was assessed by asking: “Is it fair or unfair that people with higher incomes can afford better health care than people with lower incomes?” with response categories ranging from “very fair” (1) to “very unfair” (5). On the individual level, sociodemographic (gender, age), socioeconomic (income, education) health-related (self-rated health), and health care factors (health insurance coverage, financial barriers to health care) were introduced. RESULTS: About two-thirds of the respondents in all countries think that it is unfair when people with higher incomes can afford better health care than people with lower incomes. Percentages vary between 42.8 in Taiwan and 84 in Slovenia. In terms of welfare states, this proportion is higher in Conservative, South European, and East European regimes than in East Asian, Liberal, and Social-Democratic regimes. Multilevel logistic regression analyses show that women, people affected by a low socioeconomic status, poor health, insufficient insurance coverage, and foregone care are more likely to perceive income-related health care inequalities as unfair. CONCLUSIONS: In most countries a majority of the population perceives income-related health care inequalities as unfair. Large differences between countries were observed. Welfare regime classification is important for explaining the variation across countries. BioMed Central 2016-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4827239/ /pubmed/27067864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0350-8 Text en © von dem Knesebeck et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
von dem Knesebeck, Olaf
Vonneilich, Nico
Kim, Tae Jun
Are health care inequalities unfair? A study on public attitudes in 23 countries
title Are health care inequalities unfair? A study on public attitudes in 23 countries
title_full Are health care inequalities unfair? A study on public attitudes in 23 countries
title_fullStr Are health care inequalities unfair? A study on public attitudes in 23 countries
title_full_unstemmed Are health care inequalities unfair? A study on public attitudes in 23 countries
title_short Are health care inequalities unfair? A study on public attitudes in 23 countries
title_sort are health care inequalities unfair? a study on public attitudes in 23 countries
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4827239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27067864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0350-8
work_keys_str_mv AT vondemknesebeckolaf arehealthcareinequalitiesunfairastudyonpublicattitudesin23countries
AT vonneilichnico arehealthcareinequalitiesunfairastudyonpublicattitudesin23countries
AT kimtaejun arehealthcareinequalitiesunfairastudyonpublicattitudesin23countries