Cargando…

System based practice: a concept analysis

INTRODUCTION: Systems-Based Practice (SBP) is one of the six competencies introduced by the ACGME for physicians to provide high quality of care and also the most challenging of them in performance, training, and evaluation of medical students. This concept analysis clarifies the concept of SBP by i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: YAZDANI, SHAHRAM, HOSSEINI, FAKHROLSADAT, AHMADY, SOLEIMAN
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4827756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27104198
_version_ 1782426505724297216
author YAZDANI, SHAHRAM
HOSSEINI, FAKHROLSADAT
AHMADY, SOLEIMAN
author_facet YAZDANI, SHAHRAM
HOSSEINI, FAKHROLSADAT
AHMADY, SOLEIMAN
author_sort YAZDANI, SHAHRAM
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Systems-Based Practice (SBP) is one of the six competencies introduced by the ACGME for physicians to provide high quality of care and also the most challenging of them in performance, training, and evaluation of medical students. This concept analysis clarifies the concept of SBP by identifying its components to make it possible to differentiate it from other similar concepts. For proper training of SBP and to ensure these competencies in physicians, it is necessary to have an operational definition, and SBP’s components must be precisely defined in order to provide valid and reliable assessment tools. METHODS: Walker & Avant’s approach to concept analysis was performed in eight stages: choosing a concept, determining the purpose of analysis, identifying all uses of the concept, defining attributes, identifying a model case, identifying borderline, related, and contrary cases, identifying antecedents and consequences, and defining empirical referents. RESULTS: Based on the analysis undertaken, the attributes of SBP includes knowledge of the system, balanced decision between patients’ need and system goals, effective role playing in interprofessional health care team, system level of health advocacy, and acting for system improvement. System thinking and a functional system are antecedents and system goals are consequences. A case model, as well as border, and contrary cases of SBP, has been introduced. CONCLUSION: he identification of SBP attributes in this study contributes to the body of knowledge in SBP and reduces the ambiguity of this concept to make it possible for applying it in training of different medical specialties. Also, it would be possible to develop and use more precise tools to evaluate SBP competency by using empirical referents of the analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4827756
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48277562016-04-21 System based practice: a concept analysis YAZDANI, SHAHRAM HOSSEINI, FAKHROLSADAT AHMADY, SOLEIMAN J Adv Med Educ Prof Original Article INTRODUCTION: Systems-Based Practice (SBP) is one of the six competencies introduced by the ACGME for physicians to provide high quality of care and also the most challenging of them in performance, training, and evaluation of medical students. This concept analysis clarifies the concept of SBP by identifying its components to make it possible to differentiate it from other similar concepts. For proper training of SBP and to ensure these competencies in physicians, it is necessary to have an operational definition, and SBP’s components must be precisely defined in order to provide valid and reliable assessment tools. METHODS: Walker & Avant’s approach to concept analysis was performed in eight stages: choosing a concept, determining the purpose of analysis, identifying all uses of the concept, defining attributes, identifying a model case, identifying borderline, related, and contrary cases, identifying antecedents and consequences, and defining empirical referents. RESULTS: Based on the analysis undertaken, the attributes of SBP includes knowledge of the system, balanced decision between patients’ need and system goals, effective role playing in interprofessional health care team, system level of health advocacy, and acting for system improvement. System thinking and a functional system are antecedents and system goals are consequences. A case model, as well as border, and contrary cases of SBP, has been introduced. CONCLUSION: he identification of SBP attributes in this study contributes to the body of knowledge in SBP and reduces the ambiguity of this concept to make it possible for applying it in training of different medical specialties. Also, it would be possible to develop and use more precise tools to evaluate SBP competency by using empirical referents of the analysis. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2016-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4827756/ /pubmed/27104198 Text en © 2016: Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
YAZDANI, SHAHRAM
HOSSEINI, FAKHROLSADAT
AHMADY, SOLEIMAN
System based practice: a concept analysis
title System based practice: a concept analysis
title_full System based practice: a concept analysis
title_fullStr System based practice: a concept analysis
title_full_unstemmed System based practice: a concept analysis
title_short System based practice: a concept analysis
title_sort system based practice: a concept analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4827756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27104198
work_keys_str_mv AT yazdanishahram systembasedpracticeaconceptanalysis
AT hosseinifakhrolsadat systembasedpracticeaconceptanalysis
AT ahmadysoleiman systembasedpracticeaconceptanalysis