Cargando…

Cost Effectiveness of First-Line Oral Therapies for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Modelling Study

BACKGROUND: In recent years, a significant number of costly oral therapies have become available for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Funding decisions for these therapies requires weighing up their effectiveness and costs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coyle, Kathryn, Coyle, Doug, Blouin, Julie, Lee, Karen, Jabr, Mohammed F., Tran, Khai, Mielniczuk, Lisa, Swiston, John, Innes, Mike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4828471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26739957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-015-0366-8
_version_ 1782426582541926400
author Coyle, Kathryn
Coyle, Doug
Blouin, Julie
Lee, Karen
Jabr, Mohammed F.
Tran, Khai
Mielniczuk, Lisa
Swiston, John
Innes, Mike
author_facet Coyle, Kathryn
Coyle, Doug
Blouin, Julie
Lee, Karen
Jabr, Mohammed F.
Tran, Khai
Mielniczuk, Lisa
Swiston, John
Innes, Mike
author_sort Coyle, Kathryn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In recent years, a significant number of costly oral therapies have become available for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Funding decisions for these therapies requires weighing up their effectiveness and costs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of monotherapy with oral PAH-specific therapies versus supportive care as initial therapy for patients with functional class (FC) II and III PAH in Canada. METHODS: A cost-utility analysis, from the perspective of a healthcare system and based on a Markov model, was designed to estimate the costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) associated with bosentan, ambrisentan, riociguat, tadalafil, sildenafil and supportive care for PAH in treatment-naïve patients. Separate analyses were conducted for cohorts of patients commencing therapy at FC II and III PAH. Transition probabilities, based on the relative risk of improving and worsening in FC with treatment versus placebo, were derived from a recent network meta-analysis. Utility values and costs were obtained from published data and clinical expert opinion. Extensive sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Analysis suggests that sildenafil is the most cost-effective therapy for PAH in patients with FC II or III. Sildenafil was both the least costly and most effective therapy, thereby dominating all other treatments. Tadalafil was also less costly and more effective than supportive care in FC II and III; however, sildenafil was dominant over tadalafil. Even given the uncertainty within the clinical inputs, the probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that apart from sildenafil and tadalafil, the other PAH therapies had negligible probability of being the most cost effective. CONCLUSION: The results show that initiation of therapy with sildenafil is likely the most cost-effective strategy in PAH patients with either FC II or III disease. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40273-015-0366-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4828471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48284712016-04-21 Cost Effectiveness of First-Line Oral Therapies for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Modelling Study Coyle, Kathryn Coyle, Doug Blouin, Julie Lee, Karen Jabr, Mohammed F. Tran, Khai Mielniczuk, Lisa Swiston, John Innes, Mike Pharmacoeconomics Original Research Article BACKGROUND: In recent years, a significant number of costly oral therapies have become available for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Funding decisions for these therapies requires weighing up their effectiveness and costs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of monotherapy with oral PAH-specific therapies versus supportive care as initial therapy for patients with functional class (FC) II and III PAH in Canada. METHODS: A cost-utility analysis, from the perspective of a healthcare system and based on a Markov model, was designed to estimate the costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) associated with bosentan, ambrisentan, riociguat, tadalafil, sildenafil and supportive care for PAH in treatment-naïve patients. Separate analyses were conducted for cohorts of patients commencing therapy at FC II and III PAH. Transition probabilities, based on the relative risk of improving and worsening in FC with treatment versus placebo, were derived from a recent network meta-analysis. Utility values and costs were obtained from published data and clinical expert opinion. Extensive sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Analysis suggests that sildenafil is the most cost-effective therapy for PAH in patients with FC II or III. Sildenafil was both the least costly and most effective therapy, thereby dominating all other treatments. Tadalafil was also less costly and more effective than supportive care in FC II and III; however, sildenafil was dominant over tadalafil. Even given the uncertainty within the clinical inputs, the probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that apart from sildenafil and tadalafil, the other PAH therapies had negligible probability of being the most cost effective. CONCLUSION: The results show that initiation of therapy with sildenafil is likely the most cost-effective strategy in PAH patients with either FC II or III disease. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40273-015-0366-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2016-01-06 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4828471/ /pubmed/26739957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-015-0366-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Coyle, Kathryn
Coyle, Doug
Blouin, Julie
Lee, Karen
Jabr, Mohammed F.
Tran, Khai
Mielniczuk, Lisa
Swiston, John
Innes, Mike
Cost Effectiveness of First-Line Oral Therapies for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Modelling Study
title Cost Effectiveness of First-Line Oral Therapies for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Modelling Study
title_full Cost Effectiveness of First-Line Oral Therapies for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Modelling Study
title_fullStr Cost Effectiveness of First-Line Oral Therapies for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Modelling Study
title_full_unstemmed Cost Effectiveness of First-Line Oral Therapies for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Modelling Study
title_short Cost Effectiveness of First-Line Oral Therapies for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Modelling Study
title_sort cost effectiveness of first-line oral therapies for pulmonary arterial hypertension: a modelling study
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4828471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26739957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-015-0366-8
work_keys_str_mv AT coylekathryn costeffectivenessoffirstlineoraltherapiesforpulmonaryarterialhypertensionamodellingstudy
AT coyledoug costeffectivenessoffirstlineoraltherapiesforpulmonaryarterialhypertensionamodellingstudy
AT blouinjulie costeffectivenessoffirstlineoraltherapiesforpulmonaryarterialhypertensionamodellingstudy
AT leekaren costeffectivenessoffirstlineoraltherapiesforpulmonaryarterialhypertensionamodellingstudy
AT jabrmohammedf costeffectivenessoffirstlineoraltherapiesforpulmonaryarterialhypertensionamodellingstudy
AT trankhai costeffectivenessoffirstlineoraltherapiesforpulmonaryarterialhypertensionamodellingstudy
AT mielniczuklisa costeffectivenessoffirstlineoraltherapiesforpulmonaryarterialhypertensionamodellingstudy
AT swistonjohn costeffectivenessoffirstlineoraltherapiesforpulmonaryarterialhypertensionamodellingstudy
AT innesmike costeffectivenessoffirstlineoraltherapiesforpulmonaryarterialhypertensionamodellingstudy