Cargando…

Medicines reconciliation in comparison with NICE guidelines across secondary care mental health organisations

Background Medicines reconciliation—identifying and maintaining an accurate list of a patient’s current medications—should be undertaken at all transitions of care and available to all patients. Objective A self-completion web survey was conducted for chief pharmacists (or equivalent) to evaluate me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kothari, Medha, Maidment, Ian, Lyon, Ray, Haygarth, Lynn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4828472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26739128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-015-0236-7
_version_ 1782426582774710272
author Kothari, Medha
Maidment, Ian
Lyon, Ray
Haygarth, Lynn
author_facet Kothari, Medha
Maidment, Ian
Lyon, Ray
Haygarth, Lynn
author_sort Kothari, Medha
collection PubMed
description Background Medicines reconciliation—identifying and maintaining an accurate list of a patient’s current medications—should be undertaken at all transitions of care and available to all patients. Objective A self-completion web survey was conducted for chief pharmacists (or equivalent) to evaluate medicines reconciliation levels in secondary care mental health organisations. Setting The survey was sent to secondary care mental health organisations in England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales. Method The survey was launched via Bristol Online Surveys. Quantitative data was analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative data was collected through respondents free-text answers to specific questions. Main outcomes measure Investigate how medicines reconciliation is delivered, incorporate a clear description of the role of pharmacy staff and identify areas of concern. Results Forty-two (52 % response rate) surveys were completed. Thirty-seven (88.1 %) organisations have a formal policy for medicines reconciliation with defined steps. Results show that the pharmacy team (pharmacists and pharmacy technicians) are the main professionals involved in medicines reconciliation with a high rate of doctors also involved. Training procedures frequently include an induction by pharmacy for doctors whilst the pharmacy team are generally trained by another member of pharmacy. Mental health organisations estimate that nearly 80 % of medicines reconciliation is carried out within 24 h of admission. A full medicines reconciliation is not carried out on patient transfer between mental health wards; instead quicker and less exhaustive variations are implemented. 71.4 % of organisations estimate that pharmacy staff conduct daily medicine reconciliations for acute admission wards (Monday to Friday). However, only 38 % of organisations self-report to pharmacy reconciling patients’ medication for other teams that admit from primary care. Conclusion Most mental health organisations appear to be complying with NICE guidance on medicines reconciliation for their acute admission wards. However, medicines reconciliation is conducted less frequently on other units that admit from primary care and rarely completed on transfer when it significantly differs to that on admission. Formal training and competency assessments on medicines reconciliation should be considered as current training varies and adherence to best practice is questionable. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11096-015-0236-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4828472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48284722016-04-21 Medicines reconciliation in comparison with NICE guidelines across secondary care mental health organisations Kothari, Medha Maidment, Ian Lyon, Ray Haygarth, Lynn Int J Clin Pharm Research Article Background Medicines reconciliation—identifying and maintaining an accurate list of a patient’s current medications—should be undertaken at all transitions of care and available to all patients. Objective A self-completion web survey was conducted for chief pharmacists (or equivalent) to evaluate medicines reconciliation levels in secondary care mental health organisations. Setting The survey was sent to secondary care mental health organisations in England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales. Method The survey was launched via Bristol Online Surveys. Quantitative data was analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative data was collected through respondents free-text answers to specific questions. Main outcomes measure Investigate how medicines reconciliation is delivered, incorporate a clear description of the role of pharmacy staff and identify areas of concern. Results Forty-two (52 % response rate) surveys were completed. Thirty-seven (88.1 %) organisations have a formal policy for medicines reconciliation with defined steps. Results show that the pharmacy team (pharmacists and pharmacy technicians) are the main professionals involved in medicines reconciliation with a high rate of doctors also involved. Training procedures frequently include an induction by pharmacy for doctors whilst the pharmacy team are generally trained by another member of pharmacy. Mental health organisations estimate that nearly 80 % of medicines reconciliation is carried out within 24 h of admission. A full medicines reconciliation is not carried out on patient transfer between mental health wards; instead quicker and less exhaustive variations are implemented. 71.4 % of organisations estimate that pharmacy staff conduct daily medicine reconciliations for acute admission wards (Monday to Friday). However, only 38 % of organisations self-report to pharmacy reconciling patients’ medication for other teams that admit from primary care. Conclusion Most mental health organisations appear to be complying with NICE guidance on medicines reconciliation for their acute admission wards. However, medicines reconciliation is conducted less frequently on other units that admit from primary care and rarely completed on transfer when it significantly differs to that on admission. Formal training and competency assessments on medicines reconciliation should be considered as current training varies and adherence to best practice is questionable. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11096-015-0236-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2016-01-06 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4828472/ /pubmed/26739128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-015-0236-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kothari, Medha
Maidment, Ian
Lyon, Ray
Haygarth, Lynn
Medicines reconciliation in comparison with NICE guidelines across secondary care mental health organisations
title Medicines reconciliation in comparison with NICE guidelines across secondary care mental health organisations
title_full Medicines reconciliation in comparison with NICE guidelines across secondary care mental health organisations
title_fullStr Medicines reconciliation in comparison with NICE guidelines across secondary care mental health organisations
title_full_unstemmed Medicines reconciliation in comparison with NICE guidelines across secondary care mental health organisations
title_short Medicines reconciliation in comparison with NICE guidelines across secondary care mental health organisations
title_sort medicines reconciliation in comparison with nice guidelines across secondary care mental health organisations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4828472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26739128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-015-0236-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kotharimedha medicinesreconciliationincomparisonwithniceguidelinesacrosssecondarycarementalhealthorganisations
AT maidmentian medicinesreconciliationincomparisonwithniceguidelinesacrosssecondarycarementalhealthorganisations
AT lyonray medicinesreconciliationincomparisonwithniceguidelinesacrosssecondarycarementalhealthorganisations
AT haygarthlynn medicinesreconciliationincomparisonwithniceguidelinesacrosssecondarycarementalhealthorganisations