Cargando…
A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Dislocated Intraocular Lens Fixation between In Situ Refixation and Conventional Exchange Technique Combined with Vitrectomy
Purpose. To evaluate surgical efficacy of in situ refixation technique for dislocated posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL). Methods. This was a single-center retrospective case series. 34 patients (34 eyes) who underwent sclera fixation for dislocated IOLs combined with vitrectomy were studied...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4828544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27119019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5942687 |
_version_ | 1782426599957725184 |
---|---|
author | Eum, Sun Jung Kim, Myung Jun Kim, Hong Kyun |
author_facet | Eum, Sun Jung Kim, Myung Jun Kim, Hong Kyun |
author_sort | Eum, Sun Jung |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose. To evaluate surgical efficacy of in situ refixation technique for dislocated posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL). Methods. This was a single-center retrospective case series. 34 patients (34 eyes) who underwent sclera fixation for dislocated IOLs combined with vitrectomy were studied. Of 34 eyes, 17 eyes underwent IOL exchange and the other 17 eyes underwent in situ refixation. Results. Mean follow-up period was 6 months. Mean logMAR best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was not significantly different between the groups 6 months after surgery (0.10 ± 0.03 in the IOL exchange group and 0.10 ± 0.05 in the refixation group; p = 0.065). Surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) was significantly lower in the refixation group (0.79 ± 0.41) than in the IOL exchange group (1.29 ± 0.46) (p = 0.004) at 3 months, which persisted to 6 months (1.13 ± 0.18 in the IOL exchange group and 0.74 ± 0.11 in the refixation group; p = 0.006). Postoperative complications occurred in 3 eyes in the IOL exchange group (17.6%) and 2 eyes in the refixation group (11.8%). However, all of the patients were well managed without additional surgery. Conclusion. The in situ refixation technique should be preferentially considered if surgery is indicated since it seemed to produce a sustained less SIA compared to IOL exchange. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4828544 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48285442016-04-26 A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Dislocated Intraocular Lens Fixation between In Situ Refixation and Conventional Exchange Technique Combined with Vitrectomy Eum, Sun Jung Kim, Myung Jun Kim, Hong Kyun J Ophthalmol Clinical Study Purpose. To evaluate surgical efficacy of in situ refixation technique for dislocated posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL). Methods. This was a single-center retrospective case series. 34 patients (34 eyes) who underwent sclera fixation for dislocated IOLs combined with vitrectomy were studied. Of 34 eyes, 17 eyes underwent IOL exchange and the other 17 eyes underwent in situ refixation. Results. Mean follow-up period was 6 months. Mean logMAR best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was not significantly different between the groups 6 months after surgery (0.10 ± 0.03 in the IOL exchange group and 0.10 ± 0.05 in the refixation group; p = 0.065). Surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) was significantly lower in the refixation group (0.79 ± 0.41) than in the IOL exchange group (1.29 ± 0.46) (p = 0.004) at 3 months, which persisted to 6 months (1.13 ± 0.18 in the IOL exchange group and 0.74 ± 0.11 in the refixation group; p = 0.006). Postoperative complications occurred in 3 eyes in the IOL exchange group (17.6%) and 2 eyes in the refixation group (11.8%). However, all of the patients were well managed without additional surgery. Conclusion. The in situ refixation technique should be preferentially considered if surgery is indicated since it seemed to produce a sustained less SIA compared to IOL exchange. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4828544/ /pubmed/27119019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5942687 Text en Copyright © 2016 Sun Jung Eum et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Eum, Sun Jung Kim, Myung Jun Kim, Hong Kyun A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Dislocated Intraocular Lens Fixation between In Situ Refixation and Conventional Exchange Technique Combined with Vitrectomy |
title | A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Dislocated Intraocular Lens Fixation between In Situ Refixation and Conventional Exchange Technique Combined with Vitrectomy |
title_full | A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Dislocated Intraocular Lens Fixation between In Situ Refixation and Conventional Exchange Technique Combined with Vitrectomy |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Dislocated Intraocular Lens Fixation between In Situ Refixation and Conventional Exchange Technique Combined with Vitrectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Dislocated Intraocular Lens Fixation between In Situ Refixation and Conventional Exchange Technique Combined with Vitrectomy |
title_short | A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Dislocated Intraocular Lens Fixation between In Situ Refixation and Conventional Exchange Technique Combined with Vitrectomy |
title_sort | comparison of clinical outcomes of dislocated intraocular lens fixation between in situ refixation and conventional exchange technique combined with vitrectomy |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4828544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27119019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5942687 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eumsunjung acomparisonofclinicaloutcomesofdislocatedintraocularlensfixationbetweeninsiturefixationandconventionalexchangetechniquecombinedwithvitrectomy AT kimmyungjun acomparisonofclinicaloutcomesofdislocatedintraocularlensfixationbetweeninsiturefixationandconventionalexchangetechniquecombinedwithvitrectomy AT kimhongkyun acomparisonofclinicaloutcomesofdislocatedintraocularlensfixationbetweeninsiturefixationandconventionalexchangetechniquecombinedwithvitrectomy AT eumsunjung comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofdislocatedintraocularlensfixationbetweeninsiturefixationandconventionalexchangetechniquecombinedwithvitrectomy AT kimmyungjun comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofdislocatedintraocularlensfixationbetweeninsiturefixationandconventionalexchangetechniquecombinedwithvitrectomy AT kimhongkyun comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofdislocatedintraocularlensfixationbetweeninsiturefixationandconventionalexchangetechniquecombinedwithvitrectomy |