Cargando…

A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Dislocated Intraocular Lens Fixation between In Situ Refixation and Conventional Exchange Technique Combined with Vitrectomy

Purpose. To evaluate surgical efficacy of in situ refixation technique for dislocated posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL). Methods. This was a single-center retrospective case series. 34 patients (34 eyes) who underwent sclera fixation for dislocated IOLs combined with vitrectomy were studied...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eum, Sun Jung, Kim, Myung Jun, Kim, Hong Kyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4828544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27119019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5942687
_version_ 1782426599957725184
author Eum, Sun Jung
Kim, Myung Jun
Kim, Hong Kyun
author_facet Eum, Sun Jung
Kim, Myung Jun
Kim, Hong Kyun
author_sort Eum, Sun Jung
collection PubMed
description Purpose. To evaluate surgical efficacy of in situ refixation technique for dislocated posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL). Methods. This was a single-center retrospective case series. 34 patients (34 eyes) who underwent sclera fixation for dislocated IOLs combined with vitrectomy were studied. Of 34 eyes, 17 eyes underwent IOL exchange and the other 17 eyes underwent in situ refixation. Results. Mean follow-up period was 6 months. Mean logMAR best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was not significantly different between the groups 6 months after surgery (0.10 ± 0.03 in the IOL exchange group and 0.10 ± 0.05 in the refixation group; p = 0.065). Surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) was significantly lower in the refixation group (0.79 ± 0.41) than in the IOL exchange group (1.29 ± 0.46) (p = 0.004) at 3 months, which persisted to 6 months (1.13 ± 0.18 in the IOL exchange group and 0.74 ± 0.11 in the refixation group; p = 0.006). Postoperative complications occurred in 3 eyes in the IOL exchange group (17.6%) and 2 eyes in the refixation group (11.8%). However, all of the patients were well managed without additional surgery. Conclusion. The in situ refixation technique should be preferentially considered if surgery is indicated since it seemed to produce a sustained less SIA compared to IOL exchange.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4828544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48285442016-04-26 A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Dislocated Intraocular Lens Fixation between In Situ Refixation and Conventional Exchange Technique Combined with Vitrectomy Eum, Sun Jung Kim, Myung Jun Kim, Hong Kyun J Ophthalmol Clinical Study Purpose. To evaluate surgical efficacy of in situ refixation technique for dislocated posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL). Methods. This was a single-center retrospective case series. 34 patients (34 eyes) who underwent sclera fixation for dislocated IOLs combined with vitrectomy were studied. Of 34 eyes, 17 eyes underwent IOL exchange and the other 17 eyes underwent in situ refixation. Results. Mean follow-up period was 6 months. Mean logMAR best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was not significantly different between the groups 6 months after surgery (0.10 ± 0.03 in the IOL exchange group and 0.10 ± 0.05 in the refixation group; p = 0.065). Surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) was significantly lower in the refixation group (0.79 ± 0.41) than in the IOL exchange group (1.29 ± 0.46) (p = 0.004) at 3 months, which persisted to 6 months (1.13 ± 0.18 in the IOL exchange group and 0.74 ± 0.11 in the refixation group; p = 0.006). Postoperative complications occurred in 3 eyes in the IOL exchange group (17.6%) and 2 eyes in the refixation group (11.8%). However, all of the patients were well managed without additional surgery. Conclusion. The in situ refixation technique should be preferentially considered if surgery is indicated since it seemed to produce a sustained less SIA compared to IOL exchange. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4828544/ /pubmed/27119019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5942687 Text en Copyright © 2016 Sun Jung Eum et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Eum, Sun Jung
Kim, Myung Jun
Kim, Hong Kyun
A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Dislocated Intraocular Lens Fixation between In Situ Refixation and Conventional Exchange Technique Combined with Vitrectomy
title A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Dislocated Intraocular Lens Fixation between In Situ Refixation and Conventional Exchange Technique Combined with Vitrectomy
title_full A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Dislocated Intraocular Lens Fixation between In Situ Refixation and Conventional Exchange Technique Combined with Vitrectomy
title_fullStr A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Dislocated Intraocular Lens Fixation between In Situ Refixation and Conventional Exchange Technique Combined with Vitrectomy
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Dislocated Intraocular Lens Fixation between In Situ Refixation and Conventional Exchange Technique Combined with Vitrectomy
title_short A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Dislocated Intraocular Lens Fixation between In Situ Refixation and Conventional Exchange Technique Combined with Vitrectomy
title_sort comparison of clinical outcomes of dislocated intraocular lens fixation between in situ refixation and conventional exchange technique combined with vitrectomy
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4828544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27119019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5942687
work_keys_str_mv AT eumsunjung acomparisonofclinicaloutcomesofdislocatedintraocularlensfixationbetweeninsiturefixationandconventionalexchangetechniquecombinedwithvitrectomy
AT kimmyungjun acomparisonofclinicaloutcomesofdislocatedintraocularlensfixationbetweeninsiturefixationandconventionalexchangetechniquecombinedwithvitrectomy
AT kimhongkyun acomparisonofclinicaloutcomesofdislocatedintraocularlensfixationbetweeninsiturefixationandconventionalexchangetechniquecombinedwithvitrectomy
AT eumsunjung comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofdislocatedintraocularlensfixationbetweeninsiturefixationandconventionalexchangetechniquecombinedwithvitrectomy
AT kimmyungjun comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofdislocatedintraocularlensfixationbetweeninsiturefixationandconventionalexchangetechniquecombinedwithvitrectomy
AT kimhongkyun comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofdislocatedintraocularlensfixationbetweeninsiturefixationandconventionalexchangetechniquecombinedwithvitrectomy