Cargando…
Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas for Highly Myopic Eyes
Purpose. To evaluate and compare the accuracy of different intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas for eyes with an axial length (AL) greater than 26.00 mm. Methods. This study reviewed 407 eyes of 219 patients with AL longer than 26.0 mm. The refractive prediction errors of IOL power calc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4828549/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27119018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1917268 |
_version_ | 1782426601468723200 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Yichi Liang, Xiao Ying Liu, Shu Lee, Jacky W. Y. Bhaskar, Srinivasan Lam, Dennis S. C. |
author_facet | Zhang, Yichi Liang, Xiao Ying Liu, Shu Lee, Jacky W. Y. Bhaskar, Srinivasan Lam, Dennis S. C. |
author_sort | Zhang, Yichi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose. To evaluate and compare the accuracy of different intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas for eyes with an axial length (AL) greater than 26.00 mm. Methods. This study reviewed 407 eyes of 219 patients with AL longer than 26.0 mm. The refractive prediction errors of IOL power calculation formulas (SRK/T, Haigis, Holladay, Hoffer Q, and Barrett Universal II) using User Group for Laser Interference Biometry (ULIB) constants were evaluated and compared. Results. One hundred seventy-one eyes were enrolled. The Barrett Universal II formula had the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) and SRK/T and Haigis had similar MAE, and the statistical highest MAE were seen with the Holladay and Hoffer Q formulas. The interquartile range of the Barrett Universal II formula was also the lowest among all the formulas. The Barrett Universal II formulas yielded the highest percentage of eyes within ±1.0 D and ±0.5 D of the target refraction in this study (97.24% and 79.56%, resp.). Conclusions. Barrett Universal II formula produced the lowest predictive error and the least variable predictive error compared with the SRK/T, Haigis, Holladay, and Hoffer Q formulas. For high myopic eyes, the Barrett Universal II formula may be a more suitable choice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4828549 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48285492016-04-26 Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas for Highly Myopic Eyes Zhang, Yichi Liang, Xiao Ying Liu, Shu Lee, Jacky W. Y. Bhaskar, Srinivasan Lam, Dennis S. C. J Ophthalmol Research Article Purpose. To evaluate and compare the accuracy of different intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas for eyes with an axial length (AL) greater than 26.00 mm. Methods. This study reviewed 407 eyes of 219 patients with AL longer than 26.0 mm. The refractive prediction errors of IOL power calculation formulas (SRK/T, Haigis, Holladay, Hoffer Q, and Barrett Universal II) using User Group for Laser Interference Biometry (ULIB) constants were evaluated and compared. Results. One hundred seventy-one eyes were enrolled. The Barrett Universal II formula had the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) and SRK/T and Haigis had similar MAE, and the statistical highest MAE were seen with the Holladay and Hoffer Q formulas. The interquartile range of the Barrett Universal II formula was also the lowest among all the formulas. The Barrett Universal II formulas yielded the highest percentage of eyes within ±1.0 D and ±0.5 D of the target refraction in this study (97.24% and 79.56%, resp.). Conclusions. Barrett Universal II formula produced the lowest predictive error and the least variable predictive error compared with the SRK/T, Haigis, Holladay, and Hoffer Q formulas. For high myopic eyes, the Barrett Universal II formula may be a more suitable choice. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4828549/ /pubmed/27119018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1917268 Text en Copyright © 2016 Yichi Zhang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhang, Yichi Liang, Xiao Ying Liu, Shu Lee, Jacky W. Y. Bhaskar, Srinivasan Lam, Dennis S. C. Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas for Highly Myopic Eyes |
title | Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas for Highly Myopic Eyes |
title_full | Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas for Highly Myopic Eyes |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas for Highly Myopic Eyes |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas for Highly Myopic Eyes |
title_short | Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas for Highly Myopic Eyes |
title_sort | accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas for highly myopic eyes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4828549/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27119018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1917268 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangyichi accuracyofintraocularlenspowercalculationformulasforhighlymyopiceyes AT liangxiaoying accuracyofintraocularlenspowercalculationformulasforhighlymyopiceyes AT liushu accuracyofintraocularlenspowercalculationformulasforhighlymyopiceyes AT leejackywy accuracyofintraocularlenspowercalculationformulasforhighlymyopiceyes AT bhaskarsrinivasan accuracyofintraocularlenspowercalculationformulasforhighlymyopiceyes AT lamdennissc accuracyofintraocularlenspowercalculationformulasforhighlymyopiceyes |