Cargando…
Patient safety improvement programmes for primary care. Review of a Delphi procedure and pilot studies by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care
Background: To improve patient safety it is necessary to identify the causes of patient safety incidents, devise solutions and measure the (cost-) effectiveness of improvement efforts. Objective: This paper provides a broad overview with practical guidance on how to improve patient safety. Methods:...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Informa Healthcare
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4828596/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26339837 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13814788.2015.1043725 |
_version_ | 1782426614270787584 |
---|---|
author | Verstappen, Wim Gaal, Sander Esmail, Aneez Wensing, Michel |
author_facet | Verstappen, Wim Gaal, Sander Esmail, Aneez Wensing, Michel |
author_sort | Verstappen, Wim |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: To improve patient safety it is necessary to identify the causes of patient safety incidents, devise solutions and measure the (cost-) effectiveness of improvement efforts. Objective: This paper provides a broad overview with practical guidance on how to improve patient safety. Methods: We used modified online Delphi procedures to reach consensus on methods to improve patient safety and to identify important features of patient safety management in primary care. Two pilot studies were carried out to assess the value of prospective risk analysis (PRA), as a means of identifying the causes of a patient safety incident. Results: A range of different methods can be used to improve patient safety but they have to be contextually specific. Practice organization, culture, diagnostic errors and medication safety were found to be important domains for further improvement. Improvement strategies for patient safety could benefit from insights gained from research on implementation of evidence-based practice. Patient involvement and prospective risk analysis are two promising and innovative strategies for improving patient safety in primary care. Conclusion: A range of methods is available to improve patient safety, but there is no ‘magic bullet.’ Besides better use of the available methods, it is important to use new and potentially more effective strategies, such as prospective risk analysis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4828596 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Informa Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48285962016-04-27 Patient safety improvement programmes for primary care. Review of a Delphi procedure and pilot studies by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care Verstappen, Wim Gaal, Sander Esmail, Aneez Wensing, Michel Eur J Gen Pract Background Paper Background: To improve patient safety it is necessary to identify the causes of patient safety incidents, devise solutions and measure the (cost-) effectiveness of improvement efforts. Objective: This paper provides a broad overview with practical guidance on how to improve patient safety. Methods: We used modified online Delphi procedures to reach consensus on methods to improve patient safety and to identify important features of patient safety management in primary care. Two pilot studies were carried out to assess the value of prospective risk analysis (PRA), as a means of identifying the causes of a patient safety incident. Results: A range of different methods can be used to improve patient safety but they have to be contextually specific. Practice organization, culture, diagnostic errors and medication safety were found to be important domains for further improvement. Improvement strategies for patient safety could benefit from insights gained from research on implementation of evidence-based practice. Patient involvement and prospective risk analysis are two promising and innovative strategies for improving patient safety in primary care. Conclusion: A range of methods is available to improve patient safety, but there is no ‘magic bullet.’ Besides better use of the available methods, it is important to use new and potentially more effective strategies, such as prospective risk analysis. Informa Healthcare 2015-08-14 2015-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4828596/ /pubmed/26339837 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13814788.2015.1043725 Text en © 2015 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis. http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Background Paper Verstappen, Wim Gaal, Sander Esmail, Aneez Wensing, Michel Patient safety improvement programmes for primary care. Review of a Delphi procedure and pilot studies by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care |
title | Patient safety improvement programmes for primary care. Review of a Delphi procedure and pilot studies by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care |
title_full | Patient safety improvement programmes for primary care. Review of a Delphi procedure and pilot studies by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care |
title_fullStr | Patient safety improvement programmes for primary care. Review of a Delphi procedure and pilot studies by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient safety improvement programmes for primary care. Review of a Delphi procedure and pilot studies by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care |
title_short | Patient safety improvement programmes for primary care. Review of a Delphi procedure and pilot studies by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care |
title_sort | patient safety improvement programmes for primary care. review of a delphi procedure and pilot studies by the linneaus collaboration on patient safety in primary care |
topic | Background Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4828596/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26339837 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13814788.2015.1043725 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT verstappenwim patientsafetyimprovementprogrammesforprimarycarereviewofadelphiprocedureandpilotstudiesbythelinneauscollaborationonpatientsafetyinprimarycare AT gaalsander patientsafetyimprovementprogrammesforprimarycarereviewofadelphiprocedureandpilotstudiesbythelinneauscollaborationonpatientsafetyinprimarycare AT esmailaneez patientsafetyimprovementprogrammesforprimarycarereviewofadelphiprocedureandpilotstudiesbythelinneauscollaborationonpatientsafetyinprimarycare AT wensingmichel patientsafetyimprovementprogrammesforprimarycarereviewofadelphiprocedureandpilotstudiesbythelinneauscollaborationonpatientsafetyinprimarycare |