Cargando…

Conducting experimental research in marginalised populations: clinical and methodological implications from a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial in Kenya

Experimental studies to test interventions for people living with HIV in low- and middle-income countries are essential to ensure appropriate and effective clinical care. The implications of study participation on outcome data in such populations have been discussed theoretically, but rarely empiric...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lowther, Keira, Harding, Richard, Ahmed, Aabid, Gikaara, Nancy, Ali, Zippy, Kariuki, Hellen, Sherr, Lorraine, Simms, Victoria, Selman, Lucy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4828598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26916738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2016.1146214
_version_ 1782426614736355328
author Lowther, Keira
Harding, Richard
Ahmed, Aabid
Gikaara, Nancy
Ali, Zippy
Kariuki, Hellen
Sherr, Lorraine
Simms, Victoria
Selman, Lucy
author_facet Lowther, Keira
Harding, Richard
Ahmed, Aabid
Gikaara, Nancy
Ali, Zippy
Kariuki, Hellen
Sherr, Lorraine
Simms, Victoria
Selman, Lucy
author_sort Lowther, Keira
collection PubMed
description Experimental studies to test interventions for people living with HIV in low- and middle-income countries are essential to ensure appropriate and effective clinical care. The implications of study participation on outcome data in such populations have been discussed theoretically, but rarely empirically examined. We aimed to explore the effects of participating in a randomised controlled trial conducted in an HIV clinic in Mombasa, Kenya. We report qualitative data from the Treatment Outcomes in Palliative Care trial, which evaluated the impact of a nurse-led palliative care intervention for HIV positive adults on antiretroviral therapy compared to standard care. Participants in both arms attended five monthly quantitative data collection appointments. Post-trial exit, 10 control and 20 intervention patients participated in semi-structured qualitative interviews, analysed using thematic analysis. We found benefit attributed to the compassion of the research team, social support, communication, completion of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and material support (transport reimbursement). Being treated with compassion and receiving social support enabled participants to build positive relationships with the research team, which improved mental health and well-being. Open and non-judgmental communication made participants feel accepted. Participants described how repeated completion of the PROMs was a prompt for reflection, through which they began to help themselves and self-care. Participant reimbursements relieved financial hardship and enabled them to fulfil their social responsibilities, enhancing self-worth. These findings emphasise the importance of compassion, support and effective communication in the clinical encounter, particularly in stigmatised and isolated populations, and the potential of the integration of simple PROMs to improve patient outcomes. Participation in research has unexpected positive benefits for participants, which should be taken into account when designing research in similar populations. Researchers should be aware of the effects of financial reimbursement and contact with researchers in isolated and impoverished communities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4828598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48285982016-04-27 Conducting experimental research in marginalised populations: clinical and methodological implications from a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial in Kenya Lowther, Keira Harding, Richard Ahmed, Aabid Gikaara, Nancy Ali, Zippy Kariuki, Hellen Sherr, Lorraine Simms, Victoria Selman, Lucy AIDS Care Articles Experimental studies to test interventions for people living with HIV in low- and middle-income countries are essential to ensure appropriate and effective clinical care. The implications of study participation on outcome data in such populations have been discussed theoretically, but rarely empirically examined. We aimed to explore the effects of participating in a randomised controlled trial conducted in an HIV clinic in Mombasa, Kenya. We report qualitative data from the Treatment Outcomes in Palliative Care trial, which evaluated the impact of a nurse-led palliative care intervention for HIV positive adults on antiretroviral therapy compared to standard care. Participants in both arms attended five monthly quantitative data collection appointments. Post-trial exit, 10 control and 20 intervention patients participated in semi-structured qualitative interviews, analysed using thematic analysis. We found benefit attributed to the compassion of the research team, social support, communication, completion of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and material support (transport reimbursement). Being treated with compassion and receiving social support enabled participants to build positive relationships with the research team, which improved mental health and well-being. Open and non-judgmental communication made participants feel accepted. Participants described how repeated completion of the PROMs was a prompt for reflection, through which they began to help themselves and self-care. Participant reimbursements relieved financial hardship and enabled them to fulfil their social responsibilities, enhancing self-worth. These findings emphasise the importance of compassion, support and effective communication in the clinical encounter, particularly in stigmatised and isolated populations, and the potential of the integration of simple PROMs to improve patient outcomes. Participation in research has unexpected positive benefits for participants, which should be taken into account when designing research in similar populations. Researchers should be aware of the effects of financial reimbursement and contact with researchers in isolated and impoverished communities. Taylor & Francis 2016-03-24 2016-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4828598/ /pubmed/26916738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2016.1146214 Text en © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
spellingShingle Articles
Lowther, Keira
Harding, Richard
Ahmed, Aabid
Gikaara, Nancy
Ali, Zippy
Kariuki, Hellen
Sherr, Lorraine
Simms, Victoria
Selman, Lucy
Conducting experimental research in marginalised populations: clinical and methodological implications from a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial in Kenya
title Conducting experimental research in marginalised populations: clinical and methodological implications from a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial in Kenya
title_full Conducting experimental research in marginalised populations: clinical and methodological implications from a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial in Kenya
title_fullStr Conducting experimental research in marginalised populations: clinical and methodological implications from a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial in Kenya
title_full_unstemmed Conducting experimental research in marginalised populations: clinical and methodological implications from a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial in Kenya
title_short Conducting experimental research in marginalised populations: clinical and methodological implications from a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial in Kenya
title_sort conducting experimental research in marginalised populations: clinical and methodological implications from a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial in kenya
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4828598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26916738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2016.1146214
work_keys_str_mv AT lowtherkeira conductingexperimentalresearchinmarginalisedpopulationsclinicalandmethodologicalimplicationsfromamixedmethodsrandomisedcontrolledtrialinkenya
AT hardingrichard conductingexperimentalresearchinmarginalisedpopulationsclinicalandmethodologicalimplicationsfromamixedmethodsrandomisedcontrolledtrialinkenya
AT ahmedaabid conductingexperimentalresearchinmarginalisedpopulationsclinicalandmethodologicalimplicationsfromamixedmethodsrandomisedcontrolledtrialinkenya
AT gikaaranancy conductingexperimentalresearchinmarginalisedpopulationsclinicalandmethodologicalimplicationsfromamixedmethodsrandomisedcontrolledtrialinkenya
AT alizippy conductingexperimentalresearchinmarginalisedpopulationsclinicalandmethodologicalimplicationsfromamixedmethodsrandomisedcontrolledtrialinkenya
AT kariukihellen conductingexperimentalresearchinmarginalisedpopulationsclinicalandmethodologicalimplicationsfromamixedmethodsrandomisedcontrolledtrialinkenya
AT sherrlorraine conductingexperimentalresearchinmarginalisedpopulationsclinicalandmethodologicalimplicationsfromamixedmethodsrandomisedcontrolledtrialinkenya
AT simmsvictoria conductingexperimentalresearchinmarginalisedpopulationsclinicalandmethodologicalimplicationsfromamixedmethodsrandomisedcontrolledtrialinkenya
AT selmanlucy conductingexperimentalresearchinmarginalisedpopulationsclinicalandmethodologicalimplicationsfromamixedmethodsrandomisedcontrolledtrialinkenya