Cargando…
Conducting experimental research in marginalised populations: clinical and methodological implications from a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial in Kenya
Experimental studies to test interventions for people living with HIV in low- and middle-income countries are essential to ensure appropriate and effective clinical care. The implications of study participation on outcome data in such populations have been discussed theoretically, but rarely empiric...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4828598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26916738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2016.1146214 |
_version_ | 1782426614736355328 |
---|---|
author | Lowther, Keira Harding, Richard Ahmed, Aabid Gikaara, Nancy Ali, Zippy Kariuki, Hellen Sherr, Lorraine Simms, Victoria Selman, Lucy |
author_facet | Lowther, Keira Harding, Richard Ahmed, Aabid Gikaara, Nancy Ali, Zippy Kariuki, Hellen Sherr, Lorraine Simms, Victoria Selman, Lucy |
author_sort | Lowther, Keira |
collection | PubMed |
description | Experimental studies to test interventions for people living with HIV in low- and middle-income countries are essential to ensure appropriate and effective clinical care. The implications of study participation on outcome data in such populations have been discussed theoretically, but rarely empirically examined. We aimed to explore the effects of participating in a randomised controlled trial conducted in an HIV clinic in Mombasa, Kenya. We report qualitative data from the Treatment Outcomes in Palliative Care trial, which evaluated the impact of a nurse-led palliative care intervention for HIV positive adults on antiretroviral therapy compared to standard care. Participants in both arms attended five monthly quantitative data collection appointments. Post-trial exit, 10 control and 20 intervention patients participated in semi-structured qualitative interviews, analysed using thematic analysis. We found benefit attributed to the compassion of the research team, social support, communication, completion of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and material support (transport reimbursement). Being treated with compassion and receiving social support enabled participants to build positive relationships with the research team, which improved mental health and well-being. Open and non-judgmental communication made participants feel accepted. Participants described how repeated completion of the PROMs was a prompt for reflection, through which they began to help themselves and self-care. Participant reimbursements relieved financial hardship and enabled them to fulfil their social responsibilities, enhancing self-worth. These findings emphasise the importance of compassion, support and effective communication in the clinical encounter, particularly in stigmatised and isolated populations, and the potential of the integration of simple PROMs to improve patient outcomes. Participation in research has unexpected positive benefits for participants, which should be taken into account when designing research in similar populations. Researchers should be aware of the effects of financial reimbursement and contact with researchers in isolated and impoverished communities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4828598 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48285982016-04-27 Conducting experimental research in marginalised populations: clinical and methodological implications from a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial in Kenya Lowther, Keira Harding, Richard Ahmed, Aabid Gikaara, Nancy Ali, Zippy Kariuki, Hellen Sherr, Lorraine Simms, Victoria Selman, Lucy AIDS Care Articles Experimental studies to test interventions for people living with HIV in low- and middle-income countries are essential to ensure appropriate and effective clinical care. The implications of study participation on outcome data in such populations have been discussed theoretically, but rarely empirically examined. We aimed to explore the effects of participating in a randomised controlled trial conducted in an HIV clinic in Mombasa, Kenya. We report qualitative data from the Treatment Outcomes in Palliative Care trial, which evaluated the impact of a nurse-led palliative care intervention for HIV positive adults on antiretroviral therapy compared to standard care. Participants in both arms attended five monthly quantitative data collection appointments. Post-trial exit, 10 control and 20 intervention patients participated in semi-structured qualitative interviews, analysed using thematic analysis. We found benefit attributed to the compassion of the research team, social support, communication, completion of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and material support (transport reimbursement). Being treated with compassion and receiving social support enabled participants to build positive relationships with the research team, which improved mental health and well-being. Open and non-judgmental communication made participants feel accepted. Participants described how repeated completion of the PROMs was a prompt for reflection, through which they began to help themselves and self-care. Participant reimbursements relieved financial hardship and enabled them to fulfil their social responsibilities, enhancing self-worth. These findings emphasise the importance of compassion, support and effective communication in the clinical encounter, particularly in stigmatised and isolated populations, and the potential of the integration of simple PROMs to improve patient outcomes. Participation in research has unexpected positive benefits for participants, which should be taken into account when designing research in similar populations. Researchers should be aware of the effects of financial reimbursement and contact with researchers in isolated and impoverished communities. Taylor & Francis 2016-03-24 2016-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4828598/ /pubmed/26916738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2016.1146214 Text en © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. |
spellingShingle | Articles Lowther, Keira Harding, Richard Ahmed, Aabid Gikaara, Nancy Ali, Zippy Kariuki, Hellen Sherr, Lorraine Simms, Victoria Selman, Lucy Conducting experimental research in marginalised populations: clinical and methodological implications from a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial in Kenya |
title | Conducting experimental research in marginalised populations: clinical and methodological implications from a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial in Kenya |
title_full | Conducting experimental research in marginalised populations: clinical and methodological implications from a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial in Kenya |
title_fullStr | Conducting experimental research in marginalised populations: clinical and methodological implications from a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial in Kenya |
title_full_unstemmed | Conducting experimental research in marginalised populations: clinical and methodological implications from a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial in Kenya |
title_short | Conducting experimental research in marginalised populations: clinical and methodological implications from a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial in Kenya |
title_sort | conducting experimental research in marginalised populations: clinical and methodological implications from a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial in kenya |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4828598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26916738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2016.1146214 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lowtherkeira conductingexperimentalresearchinmarginalisedpopulationsclinicalandmethodologicalimplicationsfromamixedmethodsrandomisedcontrolledtrialinkenya AT hardingrichard conductingexperimentalresearchinmarginalisedpopulationsclinicalandmethodologicalimplicationsfromamixedmethodsrandomisedcontrolledtrialinkenya AT ahmedaabid conductingexperimentalresearchinmarginalisedpopulationsclinicalandmethodologicalimplicationsfromamixedmethodsrandomisedcontrolledtrialinkenya AT gikaaranancy conductingexperimentalresearchinmarginalisedpopulationsclinicalandmethodologicalimplicationsfromamixedmethodsrandomisedcontrolledtrialinkenya AT alizippy conductingexperimentalresearchinmarginalisedpopulationsclinicalandmethodologicalimplicationsfromamixedmethodsrandomisedcontrolledtrialinkenya AT kariukihellen conductingexperimentalresearchinmarginalisedpopulationsclinicalandmethodologicalimplicationsfromamixedmethodsrandomisedcontrolledtrialinkenya AT sherrlorraine conductingexperimentalresearchinmarginalisedpopulationsclinicalandmethodologicalimplicationsfromamixedmethodsrandomisedcontrolledtrialinkenya AT simmsvictoria conductingexperimentalresearchinmarginalisedpopulationsclinicalandmethodologicalimplicationsfromamixedmethodsrandomisedcontrolledtrialinkenya AT selmanlucy conductingexperimentalresearchinmarginalisedpopulationsclinicalandmethodologicalimplicationsfromamixedmethodsrandomisedcontrolledtrialinkenya |