Cargando…
Uptake of PrEP and condom and sexual risk behavior among MSM during the ANRS IPERGAY trial
The double-blind phase of the randomized ANRS IPERGAY trial, evaluating sexual activity-based oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), was conducted among high-risk men who have sex with men (MSM). Results showed an 86% (95% CI: 40–98) relative reduction in HIV incidence among participants with ten...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4828609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26883400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2016.1146653 |
_version_ | 1782426617308512256 |
---|---|
author | Sagaon-Teyssier, Luis Suzan-Monti, Marie Demoulin, Baptiste Capitant, Catherine Lorente, Nicolas Préau, Marie Mora, Marion Rojas Castro, Daniela Chidiac, Christian Chas, Julie Meyer, Laurence Molina, Jean-Michel Spire, Bruno for the ANRS IPERGAY Study Group, |
author_facet | Sagaon-Teyssier, Luis Suzan-Monti, Marie Demoulin, Baptiste Capitant, Catherine Lorente, Nicolas Préau, Marie Mora, Marion Rojas Castro, Daniela Chidiac, Christian Chas, Julie Meyer, Laurence Molina, Jean-Michel Spire, Bruno for the ANRS IPERGAY Study Group, |
author_sort | Sagaon-Teyssier, Luis |
collection | PubMed |
description | The double-blind phase of the randomized ANRS IPERGAY trial, evaluating sexual activity-based oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), was conducted among high-risk men who have sex with men (MSM). Results showed an 86% (95% CI: 40–98) relative reduction in HIV incidence among participants with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate–emtricitabine vs. placebo. The present pooled analysis aimed to analyze (i) participants’ adherence to the prescribed treatment and/or condom use during sexual intercourse and (ii) sexual behavior during the double-blind phase of the study. Four hundred MSM were enrolled in the trial. Every 2 months they completed online questionnaires collecting sexual behavior and PrEP adherence data regarding their most recent sexual intercourse. A total of 2232 questionnaires (M0–M24) were analyzed. Changes over time were evaluated using a mixed model accounting for multiple measures. Irrespective of sexual partner and practice type, on average, 42.6% (min: 32.1–max: 45.8%) reported PrEP use only during their most recent episode of sexual intercourse; 29% (22.9–35.6%) reported both PrEP and condom use; 11.7% (7.2–18.9%) reported condom-use only, and 16.7% (10.8–29.6%) reported no PrEP or condom use with no significant change during the study. Scheduled (i.e., correct) PrEP use was reported on average by 59.0% (47.2–68.5%) of those reporting PrEP use during their most recent sexual intercourse. Overall, 70.3% (65.3–79.4%) and 69.3% (58.3–75.4%) of participants reported, respectively, condomless anal and condomless receptive anal intercourse during their most recent sexual encounter without significant change during follow-up. Overall, on average 83.3% (min: 70.4–max: 89.2%) of participants protected themselves by PrEP intake or condom use or both during the trial, and no increase in at-risk sexual practices was observed. None of these indicators showed significant trend during the follow-up, although we found a tendency toward decrease (p = .19) of the median number of sexual partners strengthening the absence of behavioral disinhibition. On-demand PrEP within a comprehensive HIV prevention package could improve prevention in MSM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4828609 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48286092016-04-27 Uptake of PrEP and condom and sexual risk behavior among MSM during the ANRS IPERGAY trial Sagaon-Teyssier, Luis Suzan-Monti, Marie Demoulin, Baptiste Capitant, Catherine Lorente, Nicolas Préau, Marie Mora, Marion Rojas Castro, Daniela Chidiac, Christian Chas, Julie Meyer, Laurence Molina, Jean-Michel Spire, Bruno for the ANRS IPERGAY Study Group, AIDS Care Articles The double-blind phase of the randomized ANRS IPERGAY trial, evaluating sexual activity-based oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), was conducted among high-risk men who have sex with men (MSM). Results showed an 86% (95% CI: 40–98) relative reduction in HIV incidence among participants with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate–emtricitabine vs. placebo. The present pooled analysis aimed to analyze (i) participants’ adherence to the prescribed treatment and/or condom use during sexual intercourse and (ii) sexual behavior during the double-blind phase of the study. Four hundred MSM were enrolled in the trial. Every 2 months they completed online questionnaires collecting sexual behavior and PrEP adherence data regarding their most recent sexual intercourse. A total of 2232 questionnaires (M0–M24) were analyzed. Changes over time were evaluated using a mixed model accounting for multiple measures. Irrespective of sexual partner and practice type, on average, 42.6% (min: 32.1–max: 45.8%) reported PrEP use only during their most recent episode of sexual intercourse; 29% (22.9–35.6%) reported both PrEP and condom use; 11.7% (7.2–18.9%) reported condom-use only, and 16.7% (10.8–29.6%) reported no PrEP or condom use with no significant change during the study. Scheduled (i.e., correct) PrEP use was reported on average by 59.0% (47.2–68.5%) of those reporting PrEP use during their most recent sexual intercourse. Overall, 70.3% (65.3–79.4%) and 69.3% (58.3–75.4%) of participants reported, respectively, condomless anal and condomless receptive anal intercourse during their most recent sexual encounter without significant change during follow-up. Overall, on average 83.3% (min: 70.4–max: 89.2%) of participants protected themselves by PrEP intake or condom use or both during the trial, and no increase in at-risk sexual practices was observed. None of these indicators showed significant trend during the follow-up, although we found a tendency toward decrease (p = .19) of the median number of sexual partners strengthening the absence of behavioral disinhibition. On-demand PrEP within a comprehensive HIV prevention package could improve prevention in MSM. Taylor & Francis 2016-03-24 2016-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4828609/ /pubmed/26883400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2016.1146653 Text en © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. |
spellingShingle | Articles Sagaon-Teyssier, Luis Suzan-Monti, Marie Demoulin, Baptiste Capitant, Catherine Lorente, Nicolas Préau, Marie Mora, Marion Rojas Castro, Daniela Chidiac, Christian Chas, Julie Meyer, Laurence Molina, Jean-Michel Spire, Bruno for the ANRS IPERGAY Study Group, Uptake of PrEP and condom and sexual risk behavior among MSM during the ANRS IPERGAY trial |
title | Uptake of PrEP and condom and sexual risk behavior among MSM during the ANRS IPERGAY trial |
title_full | Uptake of PrEP and condom and sexual risk behavior among MSM during the ANRS IPERGAY trial |
title_fullStr | Uptake of PrEP and condom and sexual risk behavior among MSM during the ANRS IPERGAY trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Uptake of PrEP and condom and sexual risk behavior among MSM during the ANRS IPERGAY trial |
title_short | Uptake of PrEP and condom and sexual risk behavior among MSM during the ANRS IPERGAY trial |
title_sort | uptake of prep and condom and sexual risk behavior among msm during the anrs ipergay trial |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4828609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26883400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2016.1146653 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sagaonteyssierluis uptakeofprepandcondomandsexualriskbehavioramongmsmduringtheanrsipergaytrial AT suzanmontimarie uptakeofprepandcondomandsexualriskbehavioramongmsmduringtheanrsipergaytrial AT demoulinbaptiste uptakeofprepandcondomandsexualriskbehavioramongmsmduringtheanrsipergaytrial AT capitantcatherine uptakeofprepandcondomandsexualriskbehavioramongmsmduringtheanrsipergaytrial AT lorentenicolas uptakeofprepandcondomandsexualriskbehavioramongmsmduringtheanrsipergaytrial AT preaumarie uptakeofprepandcondomandsexualriskbehavioramongmsmduringtheanrsipergaytrial AT moramarion uptakeofprepandcondomandsexualriskbehavioramongmsmduringtheanrsipergaytrial AT rojascastrodaniela uptakeofprepandcondomandsexualriskbehavioramongmsmduringtheanrsipergaytrial AT chidiacchristian uptakeofprepandcondomandsexualriskbehavioramongmsmduringtheanrsipergaytrial AT chasjulie uptakeofprepandcondomandsexualriskbehavioramongmsmduringtheanrsipergaytrial AT meyerlaurence uptakeofprepandcondomandsexualriskbehavioramongmsmduringtheanrsipergaytrial AT molinajeanmichel uptakeofprepandcondomandsexualriskbehavioramongmsmduringtheanrsipergaytrial AT spirebruno uptakeofprepandcondomandsexualriskbehavioramongmsmduringtheanrsipergaytrial AT fortheanrsipergaystudygroup uptakeofprepandcondomandsexualriskbehavioramongmsmduringtheanrsipergaytrial |